Flynn in major trouble for speaking to Russia about sanctions

They wouldn't have had votes to impeach anyway even if they had something. Was a gigantic pipe dream and waste of time all around

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by AaronY

Not in my fucking posts.

---

Wasn't aimed at you. I'm well aware of your position.

There was plenty of dissenting posts from Republicans anyway but not many democrats which is a shame but even worse now is that djohn and RandomGuy have to deal with getting rightfully dunked on by the likes of Chris and hater.

sad fate bros..sad fate. I'd probably rather be dead tbh

Don't forget Kyle Griffith.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DMC

Don't forget Kyle Griffith.

---

lmao. forgot about him. Not a good day for his career for sure

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by AaronY

There was plenty of dissenting posts from Republicans anyway but not many democrats which is a shame but even worse now is that djohn and RandomGuy have to deal with getting rightfully dunked on by the likes of Chris and hater.

sad fate bros..sad fate. I'd probably rather be dead tbh

---

Damn. That was savage AF, but I still laughed. :lol

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by AaronY

lmao. forgot about him. Not a good day for his career for sure

---

https://twitter.com/kylegriffin1

He's melting down.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DMC

https://twitter.com/kylegriffin1

He's melting down.

---

I can't look at that garbage, tbh.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DarrinS

I can't look at that garbage, tbh.

---

Doesn't matter, darkJohn will post it all as soon as he feels there's a victory lap ahead and he comes out of the cellar.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DMC

It's funny how heavy the bandwagon is getting.

---

There sure were a lot of people spiking the football yesterday.

Don't see much of a bandwagon for my consistently held opinion that the Mueller investigation wouldn't end in indictments, and would be a political blind alley for the Dems. Then, now or at any time.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Winehole23

There sure were a lot of people spiking the football yesterday.

Don't see much of a bandwagon for my consistently held opinion that the Mueller investigation wouldn't end in indictments, and would be a political blind alley for the Dems. Then, now or at any time.

---

The simple datasharing that allowed the Russians to target their media efforts really wasn't illegal. That is part of the problem.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RandomGuy

The simple datasharing that allowed the Russians to target their media efforts really wasn't illegal. That is part of the problem.

---

Part of the problem was a constant drumbeat of news hype that created the impression that DJT had a deal with the Russians to help him and that it was the difference in the election.

Neither of those propositions was ever going to be easy to prove.

At this point you pretty much have to concede that, having been properly investigated, neither of these things is provable to a legal certainty.

I don't hear many people expressing their relief; it should be relieving.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Winehole23

Part of the problem was a constant drumbeat of news hype that created the impression that DJT had a deal with the Russians to help him and that it was the difference in the election.

Neither of those propositions was ever going to be easy to prove.

At this point you pretty much have to concede that, having been properly investigated, neither of these things is provable to a legal certainty.

I don't hear many people expressing their relief; it should be relieving.

---

I pointed this out the other day and it still stands. Instead of being relieved the President was not colluding with Russia to cheat the election Dems just want to investigate more.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Winehole23

Part of the problem was a constant drumbeat of news hype that created the impression that DJT had a deal with the Russians to help him and that it was the difference in the election.

Neither of those propositions was ever going to be easy to prove.

At this point you pretty much have to concede that, having been properly investigated, neither of these things is provable to a legal certainty.

I don't hear many people expressing their relief; it should be relieving.

---

It's good to know.

There are plenty of other things to investigate now.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RandomGuy

The simple datasharing that allowed the Russians to target their media efforts really wasn't illegal. That is part of the problem.

---

yeah, thats what went wrong here

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pavlov

It's good to know.

There are plenty of other things to investigate now.

---

Some of them are being investigated in NY.

What else do you have in mind?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TSA

I pointed this out the other day and it still stands. Instead of being relieved the President was not colluding with Russia to cheat the election Dems just want to investigate more.

---

DJT was a historically unpopular candidate, he has been a historically unpopular president so far.

For the most part, he's earned it.

The most obviously crooked POTUS since Clinton, one of the most corrupt ever, tbh.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Winehole23

Part of the problem was a constant drumbeat of news hype that created the impression that DJT had a deal with the Russians to help him and that it was the difference in the election.

Neither of those propositions was ever going to be easy to prove.

At this point you pretty much have to concede that, having been properly investigated, neither of these things is provable to a legal certainty.

I don't hear many people expressing their relief; it should be relieving.

---

One example out of thousands. The media worked in concert with anti-Trump intelligence officials to push a narrative they knew to be false.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by AaronY

yeah, thats what went wrong here

---

Obviously the problems are the electoral college and data sharing.

The result? Dems lost. Whatever gets dems elected is the morally right thing to do.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Winehole23

DJT was a historically unpopular candidate, he hasbeen a historically unpopular president so far.

For the most part, he's earned it.

---

And how much of his unpopularity could be attributed to 3 years of the MSM telling people he colluded with Russia, committed treason, and was a traitor?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TSA

One example out of thousands. The media worked in concert with anti-Trump intelligence officials to push a narrative they knew to be false.

---

What high officials and former high officials say is newsworthy, just look at Fox working in concert with Trump to advance his narratives.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TSA

And how much of his unpopularity could be attributed to 3 years of the MSM telling people he colluded with Russia, committed treason, and was a traitor?

---

If you look at the polling, he's been around 40-45 percent approval the whole way

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DMC

Obviously the problems are the electoral college and data sharing.

The result? Dems lost. Whatever gets dems elected is the morally right thing to do.

---

The GOP and all the fake libertarian, independent voters ITT backing Trump no matter what couldn't be a better demonstration of this principle.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Winehole23

If you look at the polling, he's been around 40-45 percent approval the whole way

---

And he's been under the cloud of collusion since before he took office. What do you think his approval rating would be if the fake cloud of Russian collusion never existed?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TSA

And he's been under the cloud of collusion since before he took office. What do you think his approval rating would be if the fake cloud of Russian collusion never existed?

---

About the same.

He's a very unpleasant man who has done very little good for ordinary Americans and has taken no pains to be conciliatory toward anyone who didn't vote for him or who merely disagrees.