You think we're gonna lose to the r:lolckets?Quote:
Originally Posted by hater
4-2 Spurs
Printable View
You think we're gonna lose to the r:lolckets?Quote:
Originally Posted by hater
4-2 Spurs
He is not wrong.
Did he say we are unbeatable or beautiful to watch?
How do some of you manage to get offended so damn easily? :lol This isn't some shot at SA; it's praise for Kawhi.
Oooh they mad
Hes 100% right
Not offended. Just relaying Kerr's message. I don't think he's wrong frankly.Quote:
Originally Posted by SpursFan86
We need Kawhi just like Kerr needs Steph/Klay/Durant/Green. He loses one of them and things get bad.
That's not what "relies on him too much" means in that context. It's a compliment to KL, nothing to do with Spurs. The opposite would be Kerr saying KL can take a night off because the team doesn't rely on him too much, meaning he's a low end role player.Quote:
Originally Posted by Spurtacular
The quality of troll has really diminished since it was left to the Pinoy contingent.
Kerr need to share what he said about Kawhi that with Durant, ya know, since Kawhi is just a system player.Quote:
Originally Posted by DMC
KD has revised his take on Kawhi, did it some time ago. Time to move on.Quote:
Originally Posted by UZER
https://youtu.be/LYfND45juV4Quote:
Originally Posted by DMC
Half the jokes on here are based on half truths. Get over yourself.Quote:
Originally Posted by DMC
You really think the term "relies on him too much" couldn't, nay wouldn't have been worded differently if that's the message Kerr wanted to send?Quote:
Originally Posted by DMC
No I don't.Quote:
Originally Posted by Spurtacular
Person A: Can you sell me that watch?
Person B: no, I need it too much to sell it
Is person A overly dependent on the watch?
I am half over myselfQuote:
Originally Posted by UZER
Pretty much every team in the league who doesn't have four fucking All-Stars is overly dependent on one guy.
If Kawhi went down, the Spurs would be fucked.
If Lebron went down, the Cavs would be fucked.
If Harden went down, Houston would be super fucked.
It's easy for Kerr to say that when he can lose or rest one of his stars, and still have more talent on the floor than 95% of teams.
Agree, Cavs are nothing without him but it doesn't change the fact that they have three All Stars.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dex
But after that we are deep and, is Love really a deserving all-star?Quote:
Originally Posted by YGWHI
Well, it's the weak East.Quote:
Originally Posted by skulls138
Watching some games I'd say we're the deepest team behind Warriors...In other nights I think we're just Kawhi. And LMA, in an assertive, good shooting game.
But most nights I'm sure the Spurs are an unbalanced team, the best players are all frontcourt players and the rest of guys are a liability on offense...or defense...or both ends.
Same happened to Tim for like 15 years. Itīs the way it is most of the time, as teams usually donīt have 4 all-stars.
I hope Kerr gave that scout a bonus for that insightful information about Kawhi and the Spurs.
That's not a fitting analogy, tbh. And yes, Kerr would've worded it differently if he had a different meaning.Quote:
Originally Posted by DMC
Who has 4 all stars?Quote:
Originally Posted by kaji157
Sure it is. You just don't have a firm grasp on context in the English language where dialect is concerned.Quote:
Originally Posted by Spurtacular