#freeforbes?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dabom

It's how you finish. Not how you start.

---

You don't get to finish if you start like shit.

Spurs faced only one elimination game that whole run, guess who stepped up with 32 points :downspin:

http://www.basketball-reference.com/...405040SAS.html

Worrying about the first round. :lmao

Comparing the Finals to the first round. :lmao

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dabom

Worrying about the first round. :lmao

---

What happens if the Spurs lose that game?

Now you're really reeeeaching. Game 7s don't matter. :lol

Just admit you were wrong about Parker not contributing to the Spurs successes in the past 10 years, and we can move on.

Spurs were gonna win that series with porkers inefficient shooting or not. If it wasn't for Vince Carter, we finish that series in 5. :lol

The only reason that Mavs series went 7 games is largely because Tony sucked in the first 6 games, tbh... some people need to go back and check out the games instead of boxscore reading... he was getting killed by freaking Calderon...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ElNono

The only reason that Mavs series went 7 games is largely because Tony sucked in the first 6 games, tbh... some people need to go back and check out the games instead of boxscore reading... he was getting killed by freaking Calderon...

---

Dude sucked. Like always. :lmao

(And I'm not defending Patty either on that series, he sucked too).

We don't even get to a game 7 if not for Manu and Tiago carrying us the first 6 games, and DeJuan Blair getting ejected for kicking Tiago.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dabom

Spurs were gonna win that series with porkers inefficient shooting or not. If it wasn't for Vince Carter, we finish that series in 5. :lol

---

"If, would, could."

Who cares? The was a game 7. And Parker killed it.

How was Parker inefficient in that series? I think you got him confused with your boy Patty :lmao

http://oi63.tinypic.com/25rdwjo.jpg

Just admit defeat, bro. It's okay.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dabom

Dude sucked. Like always. :lmao

---

He was injured too, though... remember he couldn't finish the next series against Portland nor the WCF against OKC...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by midnightpulp

I think his performance tonight earned him some more minutes. Like I've said, we're going to need a PG platoon to have a shot against Wardell and Co.

---

Hey I remember this guy named Bonner man!
That dude could ball!
Lets bring back some of the same playoff memories the BonBon provided!

Tony Parker	34:09	11	19	.579	0	1	.000	10	13	.769	0	4	4	4	0	0	3	1	32	+13
Danny Green	32:09	5	7	.714	4	6	.667	2	2	1.000	0	3	3	1	1	1	0	4	16	+21
Tim Duncan	30:58	7	8	.875	0	0		1	2	.500	3	5	8	1	0	2	2	2	15	+23
Kawhi Leonard	29:14	7	14	.500	1	5	.200	0	1	.000	1	5	6	1	0	0	0	2	15	+15
Tiago Splitter	15:15	0	0		0	0		1	2	.500	1	1	2	0	1	1	0	4	1	+15
Reserves	MP	FG	FGA	FG%	3P	3PA	3P%	FT	FTA	FT%	ORB	DRB	TRB	AST	STL	BLK	TOV	PF	PTS	+/-
Boris Diaw	26:35	3	5	.600	0	1	.000	2	2	1.000	1	6	7	5	1	0	1	3	8	+16
Manu Ginobili	23:35	5	7	.714	2	3	.667	8	9	.889	0	3	3	5	6	0	3	2	20	+32
Patty Mills	17:04	2	8	.250	2	6	.333	1	2	.500	0	3	3	2	1	0	0	3	7	+17
Marco Belinelli	9:46	2	4	.500	1	2	.500	0	0		0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	5	-11

:lmao

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ElNono

He was injured too, though... remember he couldn't finish the next series against Portland nor the WCF against OKC...

---

Thank god. :lol

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ElNono

The only reason that Mavs series went 7 games is largely because Tony sucked in the first 6 games, tbh... some people need to go back and check out the games instead of boxscore reading... he was getting killed by freaking Calderon...

---

Tony was 9-16 for 21 points in Game 1 for a +20 box. Jose Calderon was a huge 3-9 for 7 points.

Game 2: Tony, 10 points 5-10, Calderon 5-10, 12 points. Lost the battle.

Game 3: Tony 19 points on 50%, Calderon 16 points on 70%. Adv: Calderon. Let's not forget the Client had 12 points on 4-14 shooting in a one point loss.

Game 4. Parker was definitely subpar. 10 points on 5-15. No debate here.

Game 5. 23 points on 9-23 shooting. Calderon a big 8 points on 3-9 shooting. Tony won the battle. Let's not forget Vince Carter's 28 points on 10-16 shooting off the bench. Guess who woulda been guarding Carter a lot? Client

Game 6. 22 points on 10-23 shooting with 5TOs. No debate Tony was a detriment that game.

Game 7. Clutch as a motherfucker.

So no, he didn't "suck" in the first 6 games. :lol Using selective memory to prop up the Client.

I would say Tony had a typical series for a fringe level all-star player, which he was at that point.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TheGreatYacht

Laprovittola is averaging 4 & 2 and shooting 32% in Europe right now

---

WTF. How does a guy like that even make an NBA roster smh.

Watch the games. Porker was trash. :lmao

Dude always stat pads in blowouts good though. :lol

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dabom

Tony Parker	34:09	11	19	.579	0	1	.000	10	13	.769	0	4	4	4	0	0	3	1	32	+13
Danny Green	32:09	5	7	.714	4	6	.667	2	2	1.000	0	3	3	1	1	1	0	4	16	+21
Tim Duncan	30:58	7	8	.875	0	0		1	2	.500	3	5	8	1	0	2	2	2	15	+23
Kawhi Leonard	29:14	7	14	.500	1	5	.200	0	1	.000	1	5	6	1	0	0	0	2	15	+15
Tiago Splitter	15:15	0	0		0	0		1	2	.500	1	1	2	0	1	1	0	4	1	+15
Reserves	MP	FG	FGA	FG%	3P	3PA	3P%	FT	FTA	FT%	ORB	DRB	TRB	AST	STL	BLK	TOV	PF	PTS	+/-
Boris Diaw	26:35	3	5	.600	0	1	.000	2	2	1.000	1	6	7	5	1	0	1	3	8	+16
Manu Ginobili	23:35	5	7	.714	2	3	.667	8	9	.889	0	3	3	5	6	0	3	2	20	+32
Patty Mills	17:04	2	8	.250	2	6	.333	1	2	.500	0	3	3	2	1	0	0	3	7	+17
Marco Belinelli	9:46	2	4	.500	1	2	.500	0	0		0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	5	-11

:lmao

---

So Patty was better than Kawhi too that game.

Sure thing :lol

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dabom

Watch the games. Porker was trash. :lmao

Dude always stat pads in blowouts good though. :lol

---

Patty was the one who came in up 30 and hit a 3 to go from 1-7 to 2-8 :lol

And :lol at single game +/-.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by midnightpulp

So Patty was better than Kawhi too that game.

Sure thing :lol

---

I'm gonna let you pump the whole forbes thing dude. I'm done. :lol

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dabom

I'm gonna let you pump the whole forbes thing dude. I'm done. :lol

---

Of course you are :lol

Murray and Forbes >> Paying Patty 40-50 mil.

Bye Patty, I wont miss your D. Thanks for the shots thst we probablydidnt need vs the Heat

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MaNu4Tres

Murray and Forbes >> Paying Patty 40-50 mil.

Bye Patty, I wont miss your D. Thanks for the shots thst we probablydidnt need vs the Heat

---

You're turning into a faggot now dude. :lmao

Make yourself look like an even bigger dumbass. It's your rep. :lol

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by midnightpulp

Tony was 9-16 for 21 points in Game 1 for a +20 box. Jose Calderon was a huge 3-9 for 7 points.

Game 2: Tony, 10 points 5-10, Calderon 5-10, 12 points. Lost the battle.

Game 3: Tony 19 points on 50%, Calderon 16 points on 70%. Adv: Calderon. Let's not forget the Client had 12 points on 4-14 shooting in a one point loss.

Game 4. Parker was definitely subpar. 10 points on 5-15. No debate here.

Game 5. 23 points on 9-23 shooting. Calderon a big 8 points on 3-9 shooting. Tony won the battle. Let's not forget Vince Carter's 28 points on 10-16 shooting off the bench. Guess who woulda been guarding Carter a lot? Client

Game 6. 22 points on 10-23 shooting with 5TOs. No debate Tony was a detriment that game.

Game 7. Clutch as a motherfucker.

So no, he didn't "suck" in the first 6 games. :lol Using selective memory to prop up the Client.

I would say Tony had a typical series for a fringe level all-star player, which he was at that point.

---

He was confusing the 2014 playoffs with the 2010 playoffs.

[QUOTE=dabom;8959448]Make yourself look like an even bigger dumbass.

Im glad. ��