Parker: 15 straight seasons of 10+ PPG and counting

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DMC

Thought you were talking about Chris Paul for a second, but I'll have to see if Austin Rivers out played Paul last year. Tony has 4 rings and a Finals MVP. Patty Mills has more playoff success than Chris Paul.

---

http://s5.postimg.org/rcwjg880n/RS_P...ials_worst.png

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MaNu4Tres

We were so fortunate Pop pulled the plug on Avery at the perfect time instead of giving him the new deal he got from Denver.

Imagine if Pop had the heart he has now, Avery would have started from 01'-03' and TP wouldn't have ever played in the 01' series vs. the Sonics when we saw his potential on full display.

---

It was more so about . . .

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MaNu4Tres

As for Parker, Parker had an opportunity because there was no other options. Pop was forced to play Tony out of necessity. Parker received an abundant amount of playing time for long stretches to figure it out, and things didn't exactly click with him from the start. He really started to sprout in the spring and playoffs of his rookie year.

Murrays' road to freedom has been blocked off, for the time being, because of being drafted to a team with a 15 year Hall of Fame Point guard and a well respected proven veteran backing him up. No matter how good Murray was going to be this year, Pop wasn't going to play him over Patty or Parker and he wasn't going to play him over Manu or Anderson/Simmons at the SG spot.

---

Even though they had won a championship and been a good franchise for a decade, the Spurs weren't the Spurs in '01 and Johnson wasn't Parker.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Clipper Nation

http://s5.postimg.org/rcwjg880n/RS_P...ials_worst.png

---

How the hell dod Malone manage to trick voters to vote for him twice MVP in the 90s...Specially since he wasn't even the third best player in the 90s...mind blown.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MaNu4Tres

Meh. We don't know that for sure at all.

That's inconclusive, because Murray hasn't had a real opportunity and every-time he does get a real opportunity ( more than 20 minutes in a game), he has surpassed expectations and performed better than anyone thought. ( 11.4 points, 4 rebounds, 3 assists, 53% from the field and 38% from three -- while not being a liability on the defensive end ( yes he's made some mental mistakes, but teams can't physically exploit him like they do Patty and Tony.

As for Parker, Parker had an opportunity because there was no other options. Pop was forced to play Tony out of necessity. Parker received an abundant amount of playing time for long stretches to figure it out, and things didn't exactly click with him from the start. He really started to sprout in the spring and playoffs of his rookie year.

Murrays' road to freedom has been blocked off, for the time being, because of being drafted to a team with a 15 year Hall of Fame Point guard and a well respected proven veteran backing him up. No matter how good Murray was going to be this year, Pop wasn't going to play him over Patty or Parker and he wasn't going to play him over Manu or Anderson/Simmons at the SG spot.

---

Parker was way more NBA ready than Murray at the same age. Parker's ball handling skills were NBA worthy almost immediately. And he had the quickness to be a weapon early on.
As much as I like Murray and hope for the best, it's not even close imo.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SpursforSix

Parker was way more NBA ready than Murray at the same age. Parker's ball handling skills were NBA worthy almost immediately. And he had the quickness to be a weapon early on.
As much as I like Murray and hope for the best, it's not even close imo.

---

It's inconclusive. If you say one or the other your biased. Fact of the matter is we didn't see enough of Murray to really assess or analyze to really compare the two.

The times we did see Murray play with starters and play enough to get a feel for the game, he played great and showed the quickness and ability to finish inside (like Tony). It's inconclusive though, we didn't get enough evidence to really draw end all conclusions.

If you want, we can spin eachother in circles with the discussion but facts are facts. Not enough evidence and with the true evidence we have.. its close.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dabom

Where the big three played faggot. Not some meaningless fucking series. :lol

---

He says the big three forgetting that Tony is one of those.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Clipper Nation

http://s5.postimg.org/rcwjg880n/RS_P...ials_worst.png

---

Yet there's only one player who has more playoff appearances without ever making the Conference Finals than Chris Paul.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by apalisoc_9

How the hell dod Malone manage to trick voters to vote for him twice MVP in the 90s...Specially since he wasn't even the third best player in the 90s...mind blown.

---

Because MVP is a regular-season award.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MaNu4Tres

It's inconclusive. If you say one or the other your biased. Fact of the matter is we didn't see enough of Murray to really assess or analyze to really compare the two.

The times we did see Murray play with starters and play enough to get a feel for the game, he played great and showed the quickness and ability to finish inside (like Tony). It's inconclusive though, we didn't get enough evidence to really draw end all conclusions.

If you want, we can spin eachother in circles with the discussion but facts are facts. Not enough evidence and with the true evidence we have.. its close.

---

Man...I'm certainly not biased. Murray doesn't have near the handles that TP had. But yeah...Murray definitely impressed with the short spurts he had. And he probably has a better build to play defense. And yeah...Parker had Duncan back there. It's probably closer than I said. But I still think that a parker was was more ready. And maybe that had to do with the volume of games he played before the NBA.

Hopefully Murray will get the chance to prove himself next year if not in the playoffs.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DMC

Yet there's only one player who has more playoff appearances without ever making the Conference Finals than Chris Paul.

---

That's -154 talkin'.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SpursforSix

Man...I'm certainly not biased. Murray doesn't have near the handles that TP had. But yeah...Murray definitely impressed with the short spurts he had. And he probably has a better build to play defense. And yeah...Parker had Duncan back there. It's probably closer than I said. But I still think that a parker was was more ready. And maybe that had to do with the volume of games he played before the NBA.

Hopefully Murray will get the chance to prove himself next year if not in the playoffs.

---

There is nothing to prove actually, Porker is eroding and its a matter of time it could be now or in 5 more years (french faggot) but Murray will have his chance.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Clipper Nation

That's -154 talkin'.

---

^That's "Taylor Swift got a banner in Staples before the Clippers" talkin'

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mikeanaro

There is nothing to prove actually, Porker is eroding and its a matter of time it could be now or in 5 more years (french faggot) but Murray will have his chance.

---

Well, that would be a damn interesting 5 fucking years. I would assume that at some point, he'd get taken out.

10 PPG for the starting PG on a team with Championship aspirations isn't exactly something to celebrate. If you're worried about his number being retired and raised into the rafters, then I guess it's a big deal.

I only care about the current year's Championship chances. 10 PPG, from a score-first PG, isn't enough. Especially when the 3-and-D guy is chronically single-digits, and the starting C can't make shit unless someone hits him for an Ally-Oop dunk.

I understand that a lot of you care about records and legacies. Keep us posted on how those things are going.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Splits

:wow

---

That's almost 3 regular seasons worth of playoff games o_O

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Splits

:wow

---

playoffs, career:

	WS	VORP
lebron	41.6	26.8
manu	20.6	10.6
tony	13.2	3.7

but tony played more games :cry:cry:cry

Page 2 has some pretty good discussion on Murray.. tbh.

Kid has been more than ready.