:lolQuote:
Originally Posted by sasaint
Printable View
:lolQuote:
Originally Posted by sasaint
The two arguments are completely non-sequitur.Quote:
Originally Posted by TheGreatYacht
This topic is about the Grizzlies losing their best perimeter defender, potentially for the whole series, which unarguably helps the Spurs.
Instead, you seem to think that it makes for a good opportunity to dog Danny Green's shooting percentages for no apparent reason.
It's like you're dreamin' about Gorgonzola cheese when it's clearly Brie time, baby.
Doesn't mean muchQuote:
Originally Posted by Hoops Czar
You can do better then this.Quote:
Originally Posted by Darius Bieber
Threadwothy.Quote:
Originally Posted by marinoman
Muchos Gracias!
would you bet your life on Green actually hitting wide open jumpers in the playoffs? A simple "yes" or "no" will doQuote:
Originally Posted by Dex
Tony Allen sucks now and in the playoffs SA can hide TP on him defensively. I actually think this makes MEM better.
:lolQuote:
Originally Posted by DPG21920
True his offense is horrendous, but they let that dude play crazy physical in the playoffs. Good for KawhiQuote:
Originally Posted by DPG21920
Allen doesn't move the needle in this series. Spurs in 4 or 5 regardless.
Spurs in 3
I'm being serious. Like it doesn't change my opinion that SA will whoop up on MEM but I think TA is a negative player in modern playoffs.Quote:
Originally Posted by dabom
The refs always let that guy get away with a ton of shit all the time. He is a positive player for the Grizz. Also has nothing to do with modern era playoffs. :lolQuote:
Originally Posted by DPG21920
Yes it does. You cannot win playoff series with guys like Allen. He was basically the reason they got swept by SA. They were undermanned obviously but you can't win in modern NBA playoffs with a guy like him. Especially when teams now have time to game plan for him.Quote:
Originally Posted by dabom
Omg :lol. I just looked at his playoff metrics last year and he was definitely a net negative :lol
Kinda hard to have a raw positive plus minus when he was playing the fucking spurs with a depleted team. :lolQuote:
Originally Posted by DPG21920
That would mean his advance numbers would also be negative. :lol
My man - his offense is so bad it clearly off sets his defense. Especially when game planned for. Being able to cheat off him and hide your worst defender on him is anti-gravity. He's very detrimental IMO in the new age.Quote:
Originally Posted by dabom
We're right back where we've started. :lolQuote:
Originally Posted by DPG21920
And please stop spouting dumb shit. :lol
What's dumb about it? I can literally prove, with actual statistics, that what I'm saying is true. You may not agree because you are an eyeball test guy, but you cannot say it's dumb.Quote:
Originally Posted by dabom
I'm saying throwing shit out to see if anything sticks. I'm pretty sure you can do better than "uhh he had negative impact dur dur dur". :lolQuote:
Originally Posted by DPG21920
And no, I aint an eye-test guy. I actually use many metrics to evaluate value to a team.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dabom
Quote:
Originally Posted by dabom
:lol
Let me explain to ya dumbasses. I ain't an eye test guy. I'm an eye test, total production, per minute, impact, role and many other things. I hope that explains things for ya. :lmao
And don't try to get at me. :lol
It never works out well for the other guy. :lol
What?Quote:
Originally Posted by dabom