Re: Russia probe pile-on: No fewer than 9 teams investigating collusion, meddling
Re: Russia probe pile-on: No fewer than 9 teams investigating collusion, meddling
Re: Russia probe pile-on: No fewer than 9 teams investigating collusion, meddling
Quote:
Originally Posted by
spurraider21
Faded pigment.
The horror...
Re: Russia probe pile-on: No fewer than 9 teams investigating collusion, meddling
Quote:
Originally Posted by
spurraider21
Trump president, not Clinton.
He mopped the floor.
Guess that's working.
Re: Russia probe pile-on: No fewer than 9 teams investigating collusion, meddling
Quote:
Originally Posted by
rmt
RG, imho, ducks' Obamacare blurb is correct. 100% of 10.3 million is 10.3 million. 23 million - 10.3 million = 12.7 million. 12.7 million > 10.3 million. ACA's estimate was off by more than 100% (of what eventually happened) - this last bit in parentheses is what should be assumed/understood.
um, it isn't a matter of opinion. It is a matter of basic math.
If I tell you I am going to give you $100 dollars, but only give you $50, what percentage did you get out of what was promised?
0%? or some other number?
Re: Russia probe pile-on: No fewer than 9 teams investigating collusion, meddling
100%-100% = 0
100% - More than 100% = (negative number)
Re: Russia probe pile-on: No fewer than 9 teams investigating collusion, meddling
Quote:
Originally Posted by
rmt
RG, imho, ducks' Obamacare blurb is correct. 100% of 10.3 million is 10.3 million. 23 million - 10.3 million = 12.7 million. 12.7 million > 10.3 million. ACA's estimate was off by more than 100% (of what eventually happened) - this last bit in parentheses is what should be assumed/understood.
Alternately:
If I promise to give you $100, and someone says what you actually got was less by 100% of this figure, how much money do you have?
