Printable View
Clinton and her surrogates have repeatedly described the news media landscape as broadly hostile toward her presidential campaigns, both in 2008 and 2016. Across the Clinton administration, both Bill and Hillary Clinton - as well as their political allies - framed the news media as broadly hostile toward them.
http://www.dailywire.com/news/20583/...mpaign=dwbrand
It will fail, like most liberal echo chambers do.
Conservative echo chambers, on the other hand, will continue to thrive because of their audience.
Too bad those fuckface clintons dont just wash up dead one day soon on some shit shore. Fuck the clintons and bitchass safe spaces!
Out of nowhere triggerring. :lolQuote:
Originally Posted by koriwhat
Hackers attacked a media startup after Hillary Clinton endorsed it on Twitter, according to a report in Recode.
Verrit, which describes itself as a media platform for Clinton supporters that provides verified, shareable facts, stats, and memes along with other "information you can take out to social media when you're having debates on key issues people are discussing," was created by Peter Daou.
Clinton, the former Secretary of State, tweeted an endorsement for the site Sunday night, and the website stopped working soon after.
Incredible irony that OP is from Daily Wire, one of many safe space news sources where stupid Trumpists like ducks get news that won't trigger them.
I just think its funny given your socioeconomic background you are a GOPotard, calf tats.Quote:
Originally Posted by koriwhat
Yea, funny how non-substantive liberal ventures regularly fail.Quote:
Originally Posted by Spurminator
... while non-substantive conservative ventures manage to do well, yes, that's right.Quote:
Originally Posted by Spurtacular
It's really a difference in the audience's, um, expectations.
Sure. But I think you missed the idea that being non-substantive is par for the course for liberals. :lmaoQuote:
Originally Posted by Spurminator
I did miss that part. That's a fantastic point from you (also par for the course).Quote:
Originally Posted by Spurtacular
my socioeconomic background suggests you're a bitchass ****.Quote:
Originally Posted by FuzzyLumpkins
btw, you're a fool if you think i support trump. fuck them all!
Lol calf tats
Pussies
5 figure Republicans are amusing, calf tats. It is what it is.Quote:
Originally Posted by koriwhat
So what exactly is your point again? As well, call me bodysuit you pansy queer.Quote:
Originally Posted by FuzzyLumpkins
Oh wait, you're a liberal? Makes complete sense now.
No wonder you have corrupt incompetent muller as your av. Fuck him, comey, and the rest of your shitlib base!
That you support oligarchs while being anything but. It should have not been a difficult concept.Quote:
Originally Posted by koriwhat
And I am economically liberal. Socially I am all over the place. Foreign policy I am fairly conservative. I loathe the leadership of the democratic party. I identify as a whig.
Sure your name is Reck and not Reek you dickless bastard...?Quote:
Originally Posted by Reck
You're def a liberal because you have no reading comprehension skills... i support none of the above libtard. I didn't vote but i am sure i can guess who you voted for... pant suit **** or 2face bernout.Quote:
Originally Posted by FuzzyLumpkins
Am i wrong?
verrit getting disowned by both sides :lol
:lmaoQuote:
Originally Posted by koriwhat
More triggering.
Not a fan of GoT?Quote:
Originally Posted by Reck
This is good. It shows exactly how the modern media works. Only approved messaging.
FIFYQuote:
Originally Posted by FuzzyLumpkins