Mass shooting Sutherland Springs church

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TSA

Never said the answer is more guns and your are avoiding addressing my point.

If military assault style rifles didn't even exist could the Texas shooter have pulled off the exact same attack killing the exact same number of people yes or no?

---

Assuming that "military assault style" means the scary black guns they use in the movies, then yes, he could have pulled off the same thing.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TSA

Never said the answer is more guns and your are avoiding addressing my point.

If military assault style rifles didn't even exist could the Texas shooter have pulled off the exact same attack killing the exact same number of people yes or no?

---

I don't know. I'm sure your claim is he could have. Any continued conversation would get bogged down in technicalities and your scoffing at people who don't know the exact terms and jargon. You get mightily defensive about the term assault style rifle because you own and love them. I get it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Blake

That taught me

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Blake

If you would have responded any other way than ":cry but muh 2nd amendment :cry" I'd have been stunned

---

Okay, then. We'll play it, straight; I should give a fuck why?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by spurraider21

That's you when gun legislation is brought up. Thanks for the share.

---

Nope. It's literally one of your fellow crybabies about Trump. If you don't like it, maybe you should switch your shit.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pavlov

Why would you buy a bump fire stick for self defense? Give the scenario in which you would use that strictly for defense.

---

Would you rather go against bump fire stock or mere rifles? You're a fucking moron.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spurtacular

Would you rather go against bump fire stock or mere rifles? You're a fucking moron.

---

You didn't answer the question.

Why would you buy a bump fire stick for self defense? Give the scenario in which you would use that strictly for defense.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pavlov

I don't know. I'm sure your claim is he could have. Any continued conversation would get bogged down in technicalities and your scoffing at people who don't know the exact terms and jargon. You get mightily defensive about the term assault rifle because you own and love them. I get it.

---

He could have, it's not up for debate. The rifle I posted ITT is no less lethal than an AR15 style rifle. AR15 style rifles aren't the issue.

And I don't own a single assault rifle so that narrative you're trying to steer towards is DOA.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TSA

He could have, it's not up for debate. The rifle I posted ITT is no less lethal than an AR15 style rifle. AR15 style rifles aren't the issue.

---

How many bullets does that rifle pictured hold?

Quote:

---

And I don't own a single assault rifle so that narrative you're trying to steer towards is DOA.

---

See? I already edited because I knew you were going to jump on the technicality.

This has gone exactly as I predicted. Thank you for going into defensebot mode.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TSA

https://image.sportsmansguide.com/ad.../637956_ts.jpg

So you are good with these not being banned correct?

---

It wouldn't offend me if they were banned. It's you gun freaks that go ape shit when the talk comes up about the proper term for assault rifles.

The question it always comes down to is what is the proper cutoff?

You freaks say "but he could have used a truck, let's ban trucks" but then run away when we start talking about muh 2nd amendment right to bear nuclear arms.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DMC

It's no so much the fear of a ban on guns, maybe some of that is true but by and large it's the fact that, in order to regulate firearms at that mental health level retroactively, a highly invasive vetting process would need to occur that requires everyone register the weapons they own. That's only a law, not a physical barrier, so only law abiding people would register.

Let's assume for sake of arguendo that the shooter obtained the firearm illegally. Would it have changed the outcome?

---

Lets make people with untreated mental illness have to navigate a black market. Good luck with that.

Trump is in South Korea. They dont have this problem. Like, at all. You are 125 times more likely to be shot in the U.S. than in South Korea.

The numbers are even "worse" comparing to Japan.

The stupid talking points used by DMC fall flat because he never says what he really thinks: He likes his guns and doesnt want to give them up. He doesnt care how many mass shootings there are. He's done the same schtick after Virginia tech, Eagle colorado, tucsocn etc.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pavlov

How many bullets does that rifle pictured hold?

See? I already edited because I knew you were going to jump on the technicality.

This has gone exactly as I predicted. Thank you for going into defensebot mode.

---

Holds the exact same amount of bullets as the rifle used by the Texas shooter and has the same rate of fire.

shooter was a 2012 escapee from a mental health facility in NM.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TSA

Holds the exact same amount of bullets as the rifle used by the Texas shooter and has the same rate of fire.

---

EDIT

To get really precise -- what is the maximum number of bullets that could be in that gun as it is pictured above?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pavlov

EDIT

To get really precise -- what is the maximum number of bullets that could be in that gun as it is pictured above?

---

100 rounds

They're for hunting Megadeer, a 20 foot colossus requiring at least 65 hits to take down.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TSA

https://image.sportsmansguide.com/ad.../637956_ts.jpg

So you are good with these not being banned correct?

---

You're telling me there could be 100 bullets in this gun in this picture?

Where are they fitting in the gun in this picture?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pavlov

You're telling me there could be 100 bullets in this gun in this picture?

Where are they fitting in the gun in this picture?

---

the magazine is invisible.

Jesus Christ

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pavlov

You're telling me there could be 100 bullets in this gun in this picture?

Where are they fitting in the gun in this picture?

---

There could be one bullet in that gun pictured.

The same amount as this one

https://www.impactguns.com/data/defa...tr5025-m4f.jpg

Do you have a point?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Quadzilla99

Jesus Christ

---

The military is as good at documenting military crime data as it is at accounting for $100Bs it loses every year.

Fuck the corporate-welfare/imperial-self-enriching MIC. It's just one of the many scams why most Americans and America suffer.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TSA

There could be one bullet in that gun pictured.

---

Dodge #1.

You're telling me there could be 100 bullets in this gun in this picture?

Where are they fitting in the gun in this picture?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pavlov

Dodge #1.

You're telling me there could be 100 bullets in this gun in this picture?

Where are they fitting in the gun in this picture?

---

I just said one bullet in the gun pictured. You quoted me saying it.