-
Can we agree on this 3.0?
Kyle Anderson is garbage, redundant and unnecessary in this team, with Gay (the much superior player) and Kawhi coming back.
His stock might be high now that he had 2 or 3 fluke good games (thinks Simmons last season, tbh), we might be able to swing him and Joff for somebody like Kyle O'Quinn...
(Note for Kyle fluffers: I don't care.)
-
Re: Can we agree on this 3.0?
Hard to see if everyone agrees or not without a poll, tbh.
-
Re: Can we agree on this 3.0?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
lefty20
Hard to see if everyone agrees or not without a poll, tbh.
10/10 lol
-
Re: Can we agree on this 3.0?
:lmao
I'm tired of fathead-breathers in this forums. I want them out. :td
-
Re: Can we agree on this 3.0?
so Nono is just a Troll now?
-
Re: Can we agree on this 3.0?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
vander
so Nono is just a Troll now?
Still porky fluffing? :lol
-
Re: Can we agree on this 3.0?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
vander
so Nono is just a Troll now?
Now?
-
Re: Can we agree on this 3.0?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
vander
so Nono is just a Troll now?
I'm just bidding my time until the Spurs are contenders again, IMO...
Funny you mention trolling for criticizing tho, you were a not so subtle Lakers fan when the Spurs still had Timmy D...
-
Re: Can we agree on this 3.0?
I still remember all the porker fluffers like the back of my hand.
-
Re: Can we agree on this 3.0?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ElNono
I'm just bidding my time until the Spurs are contenders again, IMO
Kyle will be back soon
-
Re: Can we agree on this 3.0?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
vander
Kyle will be back soon
Funny you mention trolling for criticizing tho, you were a not so subtle Lakers fan when the Spurs still had Timmy D...
-
Re: Can we agree on this 3.0?
Plus, I always hated Bonner this much too... not sure what's the big deal...
-
Re: Can we agree on this 3.0?
-
Re: Can we agree on this 3.0?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ElNono
Funny you mention trolling for criticizing tho, you were a not so subtle Lakers fan when the Spurs still had Timmy D...
you must be confusing me with someone else.
-
Re: Can we agree on this 3.0?
Spurs couldn't give away Laughvergne unless you chain him to Kyle Anderson's head. He's a career scrub and there were people in the off-season calling this dude the most underrated signing and others that wanted props for suggesting this trash of a player. He's not worthy enough to carry David Lee's bags to the airport let alone replace him. It's one thing to be cheap but, It's another to be cheap and brainless.
-
Re: Can we agree on this 3.0?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ElNono
Plus, I always hated Bonner this much too... not sure what's the big deal...
For what? Tricking Poop into thinking he's Horry 2.0? It was pretty clear to everyone, besides Poop, that Bon-Bon should only be used sparingly against very specific match-ups. Forcing him as a key cog in our rotation was ALL Poop's mistake, tbh.
-
Re: Can we agree on this 3.0?
Kyle is really valuable on this team, especially whn othr teams go small!
-
Re: Can we agree on this 3.0?
Kyle has become a solid player this year. He's a great play maker and will be useful when other teams go to small ball.
-
Re: Can we agree on this 3.0?
Pop doesn't care about Nono either.
Kyle's coming back soon. :tu
:flag:
-
Re: Can we agree on this 3.0?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
vander
so Nono is just a Troll now?
Nono is just bored and has picked this shtick since Bonner retired.
Like
Can we agree on this 4.0? ElNono is just a bad, unfunny troll now.
-
Re: Can we agree on this 3.0?
Kyle fluffers triggered, per par, etc
-
Re: Can we agree on this 3.0?
Of course SAguy came in here and got upset :lol
-
Re: Can we agree on this 3.0?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ElNono
Kyle fluffers triggered, per par, etc
Very mild trigger.
Truth be told if he's not going to be re-upped, they could look at trading him, but b4 he injured his knee he was 2nd or slightly 3rd in minutes played behind LMA and Danny and the team had a great record. You can't be sure Rudy will come back bc he's very underpaid and accepted this deal bc he was coming back from an injury and tired of the Kings. He can get double what he's getting paid right now
You should be worried Pop wants to re-sign Kyle.
But honestly, I am not sure he comes back myself and have said so in many threads.
-
Re: Can we agree on this 3.0?
When Fathead passes up an open 3 and his go-to signature slomo crossover fails
https://ibme.info/wp-content/uploads...onkey-mind.gif
-
Re: Can we agree on this 3.0?
Trade Kyle Anderson for Porzingis tbh.
-
Re: Can we agree on this 3.0?
thread is backed hard.
With Kawhi back and Gay on the roster there is really no need for Kyle. Gay does everything Kyle can do 1000xs better. He also is an actual play maker, unlike this weird narrative spun around Kyle.
-
Re: Can we agree on this 3.0?
stupid thread
Kawhi can barely wipe his ass at this point and looks like a slower slightly more retarded Kyle Anderson
:lmao if you really squint your eyes and rewatch Kawhi vs Mavs you'd think it Kyle :lol
-
Re: Can we agree on this 3.0?
Aw i actually liked KA this year. Sneaky defense and passing.
-
Re: Can we agree on this 3.0?
^ of course, but Nono is just a troll these days.
-
Re: Can we agree on this 3.0?
Kyle has been effective this year. He wasn't bad last year. I see him as a fairly solid role play in rotation at both forward positions. Provided he comes back fully from injury he's a decent minutes eater at both spots. I don't think he can be a star but a quality player sure. He needs a bit more confidence in his shooting, and otherwise he's fine. He does a good job of being in the right place, and provides good effort. I want to see him get a little bit stronger as the heft he has added hasn't made him any slower and he isn't out quicking anyone anyway. What the Spurs seem to have realized and many other teams haven't is that if you have a couple of stars and a good core of little known journeyman players who work well as a team you are competitive with anyone. The other teams seem to always want to chase potential stars instead of letting a team gel.
-
Re: Can we agree on this 3.0?
-
Re: Can we agree on this 3.0?
he's a good players, and good players are always valuable. He can be switched around, making it less risky to play our main guys heavy minutes in the play offs.