:wow Fed dropping an F bomb in the third set after some calls went against him.
But he managed to win in straight sets to preserve his legs.
Printable View
:wow Fed dropping an F bomb in the third set after some calls went against him.
But he managed to win in straight sets to preserve his legs.
He takes speed.Quote:
Originally Posted by DAF86
Wow, Federer blows a 2-0 lead and the match after looking invincible:wow
He had match point too.Quote:
Originally Posted by HarlemHeat37
Nadal has this shit on lock. He might pretty well surpass Roger in slams when it's all said and done, yet ambchang and midnightpulp will continue saying Sampras was better. :lol
Now 229-2 after leading 2-0:lol
That other loss came against my man, fatty Nalbandian. What a talent that guy had.Quote:
Originally Posted by HarlemHeat37
Nadal is looking shaky against your man Del Potro..won the first set, but 3 straight unforced errors in this one..
These serve-bot tennis players are scary:lol
Nah. Del Potro is the 3rd best player on the tour right now, it was suppossed to be difficult, yet Nadal looks pretty much in command.Quote:
Originally Posted by HarlemHeat37
:cry the joker is top five ever.Quote:
Originally Posted by DAF86
Yes, he is. Do you want to lose that argument too? :lolQuote:
Originally Posted by ambchang
Too?Quote:
Originally Posted by DAF86
Yes, three top fives playing together based on titles won speaks of lack of parity. Just like how warriors are not the greatest team ever nor the 60s Celtics.
Nah, you're right. A 5'7'' guy that doesn't know how to put topspin on a ball is a top 5 player over Djokovic.Quote:
Originally Posted by ambchang
Anderson win paid 100 to 1 when Roger was 2-0 up son. Missed opportunity, tbh.Quote:
Originally Posted by HarlemHeat37
Never would have touched that..Quote:
Originally Posted by DAF86
I have Del Potro +4.5, though, looking great..
I hope you are right but I doubt it. Even if Delpo win this set. Nadal on 5 sets is too much of a beast and Del Potro might have the worst conditioning on tour.Quote:
Originally Posted by HarlemHeat37
If I was a betting man I would throw 10 bucks at shit like that just for the hell of it. :lolQuote:
Originally Posted by HarlemHeat37
End of an era?
They were saying the same thing like 7 years ago.Quote:
Originally Posted by Spurtacular
When he as like 30.Quote:
Originally Posted by DAF86
Exactly.Quote:
Originally Posted by Spurtacular
Doesn't have to win, just has to not lose by 5 points..can't see how he would at this point, tbh..Quote:
Originally Posted by DAF86
Even if Nadal wins this set, looks like it would be 6-4 at best IMO..then he would need to win the 5th set 6-2, very doubtful..
I'm a Fed fan. I think he has a few slams left in him; but at some point the wheels are gonna fall off. Father Time is undefeated.Quote:
Originally Posted by DAF86
What would "5 points" be in Tennis? Games?Quote:
Originally Posted by HarlemHeat37
Sure. I'm just saying that folks were claiming he was done when he was 30 and 7 years later here we are. I'm not counting Federer out untill he retires, tbh.Quote:
Originally Posted by Spurtacular
I guess it would be games, whatever words they use in tennis:lolQuote:
Originally Posted by DAF86