:lol at landminesQuote:
Originally Posted by koriwhat
Printable View
:lol at landminesQuote:
Originally Posted by koriwhat
We now now that Trump paid the Enquirer to spike the McDougal story, one wonders if he arranged the mean stories the Enquirer ran about Rubio and Cruz during the campaign.Quote:
Originally Posted by djohn2oo8
Sounds like the no-nonsense types on Fox News like Shep and Chris Wallace are trying to prepare Trump University enrollees for what's coming. When you start losing the Fox News judges giving their take in fire and brimstone you know bad times are coming :lol The bootlickers like Sean Hannity will continue to ignore the bad news as much as they can and do damage control with conspiracy theories and fluff pieces.Quote:
Originally Posted by LkrFan
Fox good now
Shep and Wallace were always good. Judge Nap has been pretty pragmatic about the president's legal woes.
Shep is a retarded faggot, but I respect the judge.Quote:
Originally Posted by Pavlov
And what are your specific reasons for calling him retarded, Darrin?Quote:
Originally Posted by DarrinS
We already know you're a homophobe.
Nope. I hope they have ties to NRA, Trump etc. Michael Cohen knows. And since he ONLY got 3 years, I'm sure Mueller knows too. Tick tock MFer. Your boy going down. It's only a matter of time. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by DarrinS
Fox is complicit along with the Rs. I'm sure they are in bed with the NRA and Pootin. I hope Mueller burns it all down tbh.Quote:
Originally Posted by hitmanyr2k
FIFY :lolQuote:
Originally Posted by Pavlov
^ Maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaad AF! :lol
it's called sarcasm and glad you got a chuckle out of it.Quote:
Originally Posted by LkrFan
Fox News’ Judge Napolitano just told his viewers the last thing they want to hear about TrumpQuote:
Originally Posted by Pavlov
“We’ve learned that federal prosecutors here in New York City, not Bob Mueller and his team in Washington, D.C.,
career prosecutors here in New York City,
have evidence that the president of the United States committed a felony by ordering and paying Michael Cohen to break the law,” Napolitano said.
“How do we know that? They told that to a federal judge.”
“Under the rules, they can’t tell that to a federal judge unless they actually have that hardcore evidence,” he continued.
“Under the rules, they can’t tell that to a federal judge unless they intend to do something with that evidence.”
Judge Napolitano characterized the non-prosecution agreement between federal prosecutors in the Southern District of New York and The Enquirer‘s corporate parent as the evidence that “ties a bow on all of this,” saying that
the information in the agreement
“connects the dots between the payments to the two women who claim they had intimate relationships with the president, and
the line running through all of that is the president himself.”
“Prosecutors have told us through these filings that
they have evidence that the president committed a felony?” Smith asked Napolitano.
“The felony is paying Michael Cohen to commit a felony,” Napolitano replied.
“It’s pretty basic.”
https://washingtonpress.com/2018/12/...ce26o5sEgviq68
If your lawyer went to jail for work he did in the course of your representation, how would you feel Joey?Quote:
Originally Posted by koriwhat
he called him a low level worker in the same interview :lol
lawyers are scumbags so who cares... i'd assume my lawyer done some shady shit that might not pertain to me.Quote:
Originally Posted by vy65
what's with these stupid hypotheticals as well as using my name like you're pulling one over on me? yall fucks are stupid.
You didn’t answer the question and it’s not a stupid hypothetical. Answer the question: if your lawyer received a three year prison sentence for things he did in the course and scope of representing you, how would you feel Joey?Quote:
Originally Posted by koriwhat
i literally just answered your question corky.Quote:
Originally Posted by vy65
No you didn’t. And I think it’s safe to assume you lack the capacity to answer. Prove me wrong?
"i'd assume my lawyer done some shady shit that might not pertain to me."Quote:
Originally Posted by vy65
looks like a fucking answer to me. might not be the answer you seek and idgaf if it isn't.
btw, i lack the capacity? yall really think i'm some toothless backwoods retard redneck huh? funny how someone who can teach himself many things in many different areas is somehow seen as dense; i'm not claiming to be some prodigy however i'm definitely not who you try to make me out to be either.
Your assumption isn’t what the question asked. That’s what words like “your lawyer” and “course and scope” and “representation” mean. Kinda like what happened with Cohen and Trump here.Quote:
Originally Posted by koriwhat
So no, not an answer. You’ve really jumped the shark on this one Joey.
:lmaoQuote:
Originally Posted by vy65
most definitely an answer. what exactly did you want me to type so you could read exactly what you wanted?Quote:
Originally Posted by vy65
I’m not going to argue with you about what clearly isn’t an answer to a very direct and simple question.Quote:
Originally Posted by koriwhat
What I wanted you to do was answer a question you clearly couldn’t. My mistake for thinking you had that capability.