DOJ OIG report to find Comey deviated from FBI procedure, no political bias

Devastating for TSA and Chris. No jail for Comey :tu

:lmao TSA
:lmao Nothingburger

This afternoon will be interesting. Check out what Seth's tweet string is putting out:

FBI helped David Dennison steal the WH? SMDH

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by LkrFan

This afternoon will be interesting. Check out what Seth's tweet string is putting out:

FBI helped David Dennison steal the WH? SMDH

---

:lol no. That is not what happened. Jason chaffetz leaking classified information happened. Comey had no choice.

TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA

:lol

I clearly remember that "it was said" in 2016 that Comey went public with the non-indictment of Hillary in June 16 because he knew the NY FBI office HATED Hillary and was going to get her, so Comey had to pre-empt them by breaking FBI protocol ( as in "if no indictment then no FBI comment ) and going on national TV to trash Hillary

Seth Abramson‏Verified account @SethAbramson 25m25 minutes ago More

5/ Media is ignoring the most important type of evidence an IG report can reveal: intentional misconduct.

We know rogue FBI agents in the NYC field office illegally leaked to help Donald Trump win, but the media won't cover it.

If Horowitz ignores it, his report is without value.

TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by boutons_deux

I clearly remember that "it was said" in 2016 that Comey went public with the non-indictment of Hillary in June 16 because he knew the NY FBI office HATED Hillary and was going to get her, so Comey had to pre-empt them by breaking FBI protocol and going on national TV to Trash Hillary

Seth Abramson‏Verified account @SethAbramson 25m25 minutes agoMore

5/ Media is ignoring the most important type of evidence an IG report can reveal: intentional misconduct.

We know rogue FBI agents in the NYC field office illegally leaked to help Donald Trump win, but the media won't cover it.

If Horowitz ignores it, his report is without value.

---

Yes. Also remember this tweet from Chaffetz first. That was supposed to be classified.

BTW. Giuliani was involved with that NY field office.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by djohn2oo8

BTW. Giuliani was involved with that NY field office.

---

yep, transvestite Julie Annie had/has all kinds of contacts with FBI and even hinted, a few days before, at Comey's national trashing of Hillary.

Damn. TSA in hiding

He's hiding in the Q thread and turning on Rosenstein just like I said he would be told to do.

He's so predictable it's barely entertaining anymore.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pavlov

He's hiding in the Q thread and turning on Rosenstein just like I said he would be told to do.

He's so predictable it's barely entertaining anymore.

---

:lol

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by djohn2oo8

Devastating for TSA and Chris. No jail for Comey :tu

---

How soon you forget that this was simply the first phase of the report being released. There is much more to come, including the investigation by the OIG into FISA abuse.

http://allnewspipeline.com/images/DOJOIGREVIEWJan17.jpg

You are blowing your wad early djohn. I thought you would have learned after you laughed at McCabe's "lack of candor" only to see a criminal referral recommended by the OIG days later.

TSA kicks the can down the road again.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pavlov

TSA kicks the can down the road again.

---

:lmao

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pavlov

TSA kicks the can down the road again.

---

You think this is the final report from the OIG?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TSA

You think this is the final report from the OIG?

---

No. You kicked the can down the road again because this report isn't what you wanted it to be -- just like I told you.

What charges are you hoping for from the next report?

Here is how today will go. The MSM will try and downplay the OIG's initial report. A few days will go by and the 500 page report will be reviewed line by line and the MSM will be forced to report on how damning it is.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pavlov

No. You kicked the can down the road again because this report isn't what you wanted it to be -- just like I told you.

What charges are you hoping for from the next report?

---

I haven't even read the report, and neither have you. What the fuck are you talking about? :lol

No political bias. Lordy!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TSA

I haven't even read the report, and neither have you. What the fuck are you talking about? :lol

---

I asked what you are hoping for.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TSA

Here is how today will go. The MSM will try and downplay the OIG's initial report. A few days will go by and the 500 page report will be reviewed line by line and the MSM will be forced to report on how damning it is.

---

How damning is it, TSA?

What is damning in it?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pavlov

I asked what you are hoping for.

---

I'm hoping anyone who broke the law faces the appropriate punishment. Now explain to me how you know a report you haven't read is not what I wanted it to be.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TSA

I'm hoping anyone who broke the law faces the appropriate punishment. Now explain to me how you know a report you haven't read is not what I wanted it to be.

---

Because you went all in on Q and kicked the can down the road.

What laws are you saying were broken?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pavlov

Because you went all in on Q and kicked the can down the road.

What laws are you saying we're broken?

---

I haven't read the report.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TSA

I haven't read the report.

---

So how can you say it will be damning? :rollin

djohn laugh and laugh

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pavlov

How damning is it, TSA?

What is damning in it?

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TSA

I haven't read the report.

---

:lmao

:lmao

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by djohn2oo8

So how can you say it will be damning? :rollin

djohn laugh and laugh

---

Would a text message from the FBI's chief counterintelligence officer saying he will stop Trump from becoming President damning?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TSA

---

Wait, now you know what's in the report?

You're flailing, dude.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TSA

Would a text message from the FBI's chief counterintelligence officer saying he will stop Trump from becoming President damning?

---

There is a problem with your theory. The FBI didn't announce Trump was under investigation until after he was already in office.

:lmao TSA

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pavlov

Wait, now you know what's in the report?

You're flailing, dude.

---

Was that damning or not damning?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by djohn2oo8

:lmao

---

Jun 13 2018 23:50:25
Q !CbboFOtcZs
1739449
POTUS in possession of (and reviewing):
1. Original IG unredacted report
2. Modified IG unredacted report [RR version]
3. Modified IG redacted report [RR version]
4. IG summary notes re: obstruction(s) to obtain select info (classified)
[#3 released tomorrow]
[SEC: FBI/DOJ handling of HRC email investigation]
[[RR]]
Who has the sole ability to DECLAS it all?
Did you witness the stage being set today?
Nunes/Grassley/Freedom C. push for docs.
[[RR]] central figure within docs (personally involved).
KNOWN CONFLICT.
Immediate impeachment / resignation / termination / recusal IF EVER BROUGHT TO LIGHT.
Be loud.
Be heard.
Fight for TRUTH.
Q

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TSA

Would a text message from the FBI's chief counterintelligence officer saying he will stop Trump from becoming President damning?

---

Depends on if he suspected Russia's influence on the election at that time.

Did he suspect Russia's influence at that time, TSA?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TSA

Jun 13 2018 23:50:25
Q !CbboFOtcZs
1739449
POTUS in possession of (and reviewing):
1. Original IG unredacted report
2. Modified IG unredacted report [RR version]
3. Modified IG redacted report [RR version]
4. IG summary notes re: obstruction(s) to obtain select info (classified)
[#3 released tomorrow]
[SEC: FBI/DOJ handling of HRC email investigation]
[[RR]]
Who has the sole ability to DECLAS it all?
Did you witness the stage being set today?
Nunes/Grassley/Freedom C. push for docs.
[[RR]] central figure within docs (personally involved).
KNOWN CONFLICT.
Immediate impeachment / resignation / termination / recusal IF EVER BROUGHT TO LIGHT.
Be loud.
Be heard.
Fight for TRUTH.
Q

---

So you're all in on Q now, TSA?

Yes or no.

Mr. Pizzagate urges a cautious approach to speculation.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spurminator

Mr. Pizzagate urges a cautious approach to speculation.

---

BUT HE WAS CHILLING WITH THE SECRET SERVICE OUTSIDE AF1

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pavlov

BUT HE WAS CHILLING WITH THE SECRET SERVICE OUTSIDE AF1

---

:lol

https://i.redd.it/a7210fe028d01.jpg

DOES NOT CHALLENGE decision not to prosecute Clinton. :lmao :lmao :lmao TSA

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by djohn2oo8

DOES NOT CHALLENGE decision not to prosecute Clinton. :lmao :lmao :lmao TSA

---

YOU JUST WAIT UNTIL THE NEXT REPORT. ALSO FIRE THE JEW.

Yeah...all the nothing that everyone knew was going to come from this came from this.

Time to roll out all the nothingness that will come from the Mueller investigation so we can try and cope and facilitate these next two years and move on from this chapter in stupid American history.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Chucho

Yeah...all the nothing that everyone knew was going to come from this came from this.

Time to roll out all the nothingness that will come from the Mueller investigation so we can try and cope and facilitate these next two years and move on from this chapter in stupid American history.

---

The report hasn’t even been released yet :lol

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TSA

---

TSA DOWN! TSA DOWN!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by djohn2oo8

TSA DOWN! TSA DOWN!

---

:lmao TSA

https://thumbs.gfycat.com/WavyFemale...restricted.gif

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TSA

---

That's not changing the nothingness that is coming from this. You went "all-in" on a Hail Mary and it was batted down and will be batted down once it's "officially" released. Either way, it was/is a futile, ineffective and generally useless production.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by djohn2oo8

---

DAMNING!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pavlov

DAMNING!

---

:rollin TSA

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Chucho

Yeah...all the nothing that everyone knew was going to come from this came from this.

Time to roll out all the nothingness that will come from the Mueller investigation so we can try and cope and facilitate these next two years and move on from this chapter in stupid American history.

---

Russians and US citizens have, and will continue to be snagged for interfering in our elections.

This is far from nothing.
Keep this going as long as possible as well as shoring up our entire process. You will have Boots on your back every time an R wins an election. You want people still thinking Trump is an illegitimate winner then you go right ahead and hope it ends. We KNOW the Russians played our elections. That’s enough.

Cant see how people brush this idly aside.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by djohn2oo8

DOES NOT CHALLENGE decision not to prosecute Clinton. :lmao :lmao :lmao TSA

---

:lol

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by pgardn

Russians and US citizens have, and will continue to be snagged for interfering in our elections.

This is far from nothing.
Keep this going as long as possible as well as shoring up our entire process. You will have Boots on your back every time an R wins an election. You want people still thinking Trump is an illegitimate winner then you go right ahead and hope it ends. We KNOW the Russians played our elections. That’s enough.

Cant see how people brush this idly aside.

---

We don't know how much they played in it. Until we get beyond some circumstantial evidence and some friggin ineffectual, and completely laughable, "indictments" that will never be answered from some Russian troll farmers, I don't invest too much stock into it. If it was as massive as predicted with someone as stupid as Trump and the political neophytes he surrounded himself with, there'd be more to it. There's more evidence of DNC collusion than Russian collusion.

I brush it by as much as Lefties brushed Hillary's incredibly shady past and issues (email servers and smashed cell phones) and the Bernie collusion by. I brush it off as easily as PizzaGate, Obama's birth certificate and so on. Not enough smoke for me to worry about the "fire".

Absolutely unreal! :lmao

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Chucho

That's not changing the nothingness that is coming from this. You went "all-in" on a Hail Mary and it was batted down and will be batted down once it's "officially" released. Either way, it was/is a futile, ineffective and generally useless production.

---

:lol batted down

You don’t understand how these reports work. There will not be criminal recommendations made in the report. Those come separately. Splits learned that one the hard way. Give it a few days after the report is actually released and reviewed and then you can say I was batted down.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Splits

Absolutely unreal! :lmao

---

:lmao the timing

:lmao you didn’t learn from the last time

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TSA

:lol batted down

You don’t understand how these reports work. There will not be criminal recommendations made in the report. Those come separately. Splits learned that one the hard way. Give it a few days after the report is actually released and reviewed and then you can say I was batted down.

---

Texts no relevance to Russia probe! Lordy!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TSA

:lol batted down

You don’t understand how these reports work. There will not be criminal recommendations made in the report. Those come separately. Splits learned that one the hard way. Give it a few days after the report is actually released and reviewed and then you can say I was batted down.

---

What criminal recommendations are you hoping for?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by djohn2oo8

Texts no relevance to Russia probe! Lordy!

---

That explains why the FBI hid them from Congress :lol

OIG reports continue to deliver delicious nothingburgers. But wait, WAIT until the next one! :lmao

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pavlov

What criminal recommendations are you hoping for?

---

Already answered you just didn’t like it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Chucho

We don't know how much they played in it. Until we get beyond some circumstantial evidence and some friggin ineffectual, and completely laughable, "indictments" that will never be answered from some Russian troll farmers, I don't invest too much stock into it. If it was as massive as predicted with someone as stupid as Trump and the political neophytes he surrounded himself with, there'd be more to it. There's more evidence of DNC collusion than Russian collusion.

I brush it by as much as Lefties brushed Hillary's incredibly shady past and issues (email servers and smashed cell phones) and the Bernie collusion by. I brush it off as easily as PizzaGate, Obama's birth certificate and so on. Not enough smoke for me to worry about the "fire".

---

Its not about Trump and collusion imo.

Its about punishing people who interefered. Those Troll farmers get money and guidance. We have already hit some of the guys in Putin’s top group of buddies. This needs to continue as well as a comprehensive look into all States keeping a secure system in place. This was played through numerous angles besides trolls. We have learned some but we need to keep scratching.

Rs like you make the mistake of thinking this is all about bringing down Trump because of Boots and Djohnlike attitudes. It’s not. I don’t believe Trump colluded but I firmly believe a good look is absolutely necessary. Once elections in a country are questioned, democracy gets in trouble. Trump still looking for 3 million illegal votes... I guess you want Mueller on this...

For gods sake Trump knows we got played by Russia, he’s just worried about family and friends.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TSA

:lmao the timing

:lmao you didn’t learn from the last time

---

lol "learn"

I learned it was a nothingburger when it was released and a nothingburger today

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Splits

OIG reports continue to deliver delicious nothingburgers. But wait, WAIT until the next one! :lmao

---

You, nor any reporter, has even read the first one. :lol

You going to disappear again like the last time McCabe got a criminal referral?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by pgardn

Russians and US citizens have, and will continue to be snagged for interfering in our elections.

---

which US citizens have been snagged for election interference?

honest question, not sure who you're talking about.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Splits

lol "learn"

I learned it was a nothingburger when it was released and a nothingburger today

---

Link to the report since it’s been released. K thx.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by pgardn

Its not about Trump and collusion imo.

Its about punishing people who interefered. Those Troll farmers get money and guidance. We have already hit some of the guys in Putin’s top group of buddies. This needs to continue as well as a comprehensive look into all States keeping a secure system in place. This was played through numerous angles besides trolls. We have learned some but we need to keep scratching.

Rs like you make the mistake of thinking this is all about bringing down Trump because of Boots and Djohnlike attitudes. It’s not. I don’t believe Trump colluded but I firmly believe a good look is absolutely necessary. Once elections in a country are questioned, democracy gets in trouble. Trump still looking for 3 million illegal votes... I guess you want Mueller on this...

For gods sake Trump knows we got played by Russia, he’s just worried about family and friends.

---

Great post! +3

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TSA

That explains why the FBI hid them from Congress :lol

---

DOJ concluded this son. You lose. Again. Your boy Horwitz.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Winehole23

which US citizens have been snagged for election interference?

honest question, not sure who you're talking about.

---

Its in Mueller 13 indictments of the Russians. He indicted an american too.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Winehole23

which US citizens have been snagged for election interference?

honest question, not sure who you're talking about.

---

Good question. None. But lying about even talking to Russians. We may never know the extent since some of them have pleaded out. As far as innocent intereference, apparently a number of Trump campaign organizers.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by djohn2oo8

Its in Mueller 13 indictments of the Russians. He indicted an american too.

---

What was the American indicted for, I can’t recall exactly?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by djohn2oo8

Its in Mueller 13 indictments of the Russians. He indicted an american too.

---

Who?

:lmao Rudy

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TSA

Already answered you just didn’t like it.

---

Actually, you didn't answer it at all.

I asked you what criminal recommendations you are hoping for. Reading the entire OIG report -- which you will not do -- is not needed to hope for any criminal recommendations.

You have made claim after claim about this OIG report without reading it and continue to do so today -- but you clam up when merely asked what you hope about it.

What criminal recommendations are you hoping for?

It was an unprofessional text but not surprising nor evidence of tampering/malpractice.

It's telling that this is all TSA can cling to.

the new tack seems to be that everything damning can already be found in the OIG report -- but that nobody is willing to pay attention to it.

QAnon's tip about POTUS comparing different versions is similar.

DJT supporters going lit crit, always an entertaining gambit.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by djohn2oo8

---

Wasn't Strzok also the guy that helped Comey draft the letter to re-open the Clinton investigation right before the election? Not sure how that was supposed to help Clinton beat Trump :lol

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by djohn2oo8

---

In assessing the decision to prioritize the Russia investigation over following up on the Midyear-related investigative lead discovered on the Weiner laptop, we were particularly concerned about text messages sent by Strzok and Page that potentially indicated or created the appearance that investigative decisions they made were impacted by bias or improper considerations.
Most of the text messages raising such questions pertained to the Russia investigation, and the implication in some of these text messages, particularly Strzok’s August 8 text message (“we’ll stop” candidate Trump from being elected), was that Strzok might be willing to take official action to impact a presidential candidate’s electoral prospects. Under these circumstances, we did not have confidence that Strzok’s decision to prioritize the Russia investigation over following up on the Midyear-related investigative lead discovered on the Weiner laptop was free from bias.

https://www.justice.gov/file/1071991/download

TSA on cue

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Winehole23

the new tack seems to be that everything damning can already be found in the OIG report -- but that nobody is willing to pay attention to it.

QAnon's tip about POTUS comparing different versions is similar.

DJT supporters going lit crit, always an entertaining gambit.

---

ALL THE GOOD STUFF HAD BEEN REDACTED BY THE JOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Winehole23

TSA on cue

---

on cue reading the actual report :bobo

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TSA

In assessing the decision to prioritize the Russia investigation over following up on the Midyear-related investigative lead discovered on the Weiner laptop, we were particularly concerned about text messages sent by Strzok and Page that potentially indicated or created the appearance that investigative decisions they made were impacted by bias or improper considerations.

Most of the text messages raising such questions pertained to the Russia investigation, and the implication in some of these text messages, particularly Strzok’s August 8 text message (“we’ll stop” candidate Trump from being elected), was that Strzok might be willing to take official action to impact a presidential candidate’s electoral prospects. Under these circumstances, we did not have confidence that Strzok’s decision to prioritize the Russia investigation over following up on the Midyear-related investigative lead discovered on the Weiner laptop was free from bias.

https://www.justice.gov/file/1071991/download

---

You've pushed your chips in on a 10 / 5 non-suited.

Quote:

---

There were clearly tensions and disagreements in a number of important areas between Midyear agents and prosecutors. However, we did not find documentary or testimonial evidence that improper considerations, including political bias, directly affected the specific investigative decisions we reviewed in Chapter Five, or that the justifications offered for these decisions were pretextual.

Nonetheless, these messages cast a cloud over the FBI’s handling of the Midyear investigation and the investigation’s credibility. But our review did not find evidence to connect the political views expressed in these messages to the specific investigative decisions that we reviewed; rather, consistent with the analytic approach described above, we found that these specific decisions were the result of discretionary judgments made during the course of an investigation by the Midyear agents and prosecutors and that these judgment calls were not unreasonable.

---

So ultimately, Strzokgate boils down to bad optics.

This can't be what 4chan sleuths were hoping for.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spurminator

You've pushed your chips in on a 10 / 5 non-suited.

---

I’m only on Page 12...flop hasn’t even been dealt.


“We were deeply troubled by text messages exchanged between Strzok and Page that potentially indicated or created the appearance that investigative decisions were impacted by bias or improper considerations. Most of the text messages raising such questions pertained to the Russia investigation, which was not a part of this review. Nonetheless, when one senior FBI official, Strzok, who was helping to lead the Russia investigation at the time, conveys in a text message to another senior FBI official, Page, “No. No he won’t. We’ll stop it” in response to her question “[Trump’s] not ever going to become president, right? Right?!”, it is not only indicative of a biased state of mind but, even more seriously, implies a willingness to take official action to impact the presidential candidate’s electoral prospects. This is antithetical to the core values of the FBI and the Department of Justice.“

https://www.justice.gov/file/1071991/download

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TSA

I’m only on Page 12...flop hasn’t even been dealt.


“We were deeply troubled by text messages exchanged between Strzok and Page that potentially indicated or created the appearance that investigative decisions were impacted by bias or improper considerations. Most of the text messages raising such questions pertained to the Russia investigation, which was not a part of this review. Nonetheless, when one senior FBI official, Strzok, who was helping to lead the Russia investigation at the time, conveys in a text message to another senior FBI official, Page, “No. No he won’t. We’ll stop it” in response to her question “[Trump’s] not ever going to become president, right? Right?!”, it is not only indicative of a biased state of mind but, even more seriously, implies a willingness to take official action to impact the presidential candidate’s electoral prospects. This is antithetical to the core values of the FBI and the Department of Justice.“

https://www.justice.gov/file/1071991/download

---

Our report makes nine recommendations to the Department and the FBI to assist them in addressing the issues that we identified in this review:

• We recommend that the Department and the FBI consider developing guidance that identifies the risks associated with and alternatives to permitting a witness to attend a voluntary interview of another witness (including in the witness’s capacity as counsel).

• We recommend that the Department consider making explicit that, except in situations where the law requires or permits disclosure, an investigating agency cannot publicly announce its recommended charging decision prior to consulting with the Attorney General, Deputy Attorney General, U.S. Attorney, or his or her designee, and cannot proceed without the approval of one of these officials.

• We recommend that the Department and the FBI consider adopting a policy addressing the appropriateness of Department employees discussing the conduct of uncharged individuals in public statements.

• We recommend that the Department consider providing guidance to agents and prosecutors concerning the taking of overt investigative steps, indictments, public announcements, or other actions that could impact an election.

• We recommend that the Office of the Deputy Attorney General take steps to improve the retention and monitoring of text messages Department-wide.

• We recommend that the FBI add a warning banner to all of the FBI’s mobile phones and devices in order to further notify users that they have no reasonable expectation of privacy.

• We recommend that the FBI consider (a) assessing whether it has provided adequate training to employees about the proper use of text messages and instant messages, including any related discovery obligations, and (b)providing additional guidance about the allowable uses of FBI devices for any nongovernmental purpose, including guidance about the use of FBI devices for political conversations.

• We recommend that the FBI consider whether(a) it is appropriately educating employees about both its media contact policy and the Department’s ethics rules pertaining to the acceptance of gifts, and (b) its disciplinary provisions and penalties are sufficient to deter such improper conduct.

• We recommend that Department ethics officials include the review of campaign donations for possible conflict issues when Department employees or their spouses run for public office.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TSA

I’m only on Page 12...flop hasn’t even been dealt.

“We were deeply troubled by text messages exchanged between Strzok and Page that potentially indicated or created the appearance that investigative decisions were impacted by bias or improper considerations. Most of the text messages raising such questions pertained to the Russia investigation, which was not a part of this review. Nonetheless, when one senior FBI official, Strzok, who was helping to lead the Russia investigation at the time, conveys in a text message to another senior FBI official, Page, “No. No he won’t. We’ll stop it” in response to her question “[Trump’s] not ever going to become president, right? Right?!”, it is not only indicative of a biased state of mind but, even more seriously, implies a willingness to take official action to impact the presidential candidate’s electoral prospects. This is antithetical to the core values of the FBI and the Department of Justice.“

https://www.justice.gov/file/1071991/download

---

The flop has been dealt, you just haven't read the cards. Even the part you posted is still only about optics. That's the report in a nutshell.

https://i.imgur.com/TEV1ZXT.jpg

LOL. Nothing Burger with no meat whatsoever.

Another massive dud and another epic failed prediction by TSA

:lol McCabe is fucked
:lol Comey is fucked
:lol Hillary is fucked
:lol Strok and Paige are fucked

:lmao None of them are even facing charges let alone going to jail for it. And what's worst of all is that this makes Hillary look like the victim.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Reck

Another massive dud and another epic failed prediction by TSA

:lol McCabe is fucked
:lol Comey is fucked
:lol Hillary is fucked
:lol Strok and Paige are fucked

:lmao None of them are even facing charges let alone going to jail for it. And what's worst of all is that this makes Hillary look like the victim.

---

:lmao He is still reading

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by djohn2oo8

:lmao He is still reading

---

Of course I’m reading it. You continue to rely on a pair of Kyles to read it for you.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TSA

Of course I’m reading it. You continue to rely on a pair of Kyles to read it for you.

---

Let me condense it for you: No one gets charged.

At least you can add this to the list of failures you got going.