Murray is the most important short term development, but Walker is the most important long term development because he more closely resembles the rough outline of a go-to offensive player.
I attribute the hype surrounding Murray mostly to the Spurs doing something they rarely do, which is hyping up one of their players and them having had a hand in two all-time player development cases. If he were elsewhere, it's doubtful he'd be viewed any more fondly than comparable types like Dunn and Exum.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Chinook
Gotta anoint someone. Closer to Hill than Kawhi so far. But if he lives up to the hype,
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Chinook
the Spurs are dark horse contenders
If your team doesn't start with a superstar, you're immediately disqualified from even theoretically becoming a championship contender. That's not to be confused with having one automatically equalling contention though.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
MaNu4Tres
Who remembers a year ago when fans said he was 3-4 years away?
When you see talent, sometimes you just know.
I missed the part when he arrived offensively.
Unfortunately, his talent lies in the least important areas for his position/role. Without a foundational offensive skill to build off of, the roadmap to his supposedly becoming a star or borderline one, as Lowe termed it, is unclear.