:lol
Printable View
:lol
The whiniest (alleged) billionaire on the planet.
Trash picks a fight with EVERYBODY and his ignorant loser cult mob thinks that makes war-evader Pres Bone Spurs look tough, strong Macho Man
This is the biggest problem with this fraud. Separation of powers is paramount to democracy, and chicanery from the Executive to the Judicial would fall right within lack of decorum.
Chuck
Chuck *ding*ing hard for his fuhrer.Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris
Before he began his attack on a Supreme Court decision not yet a week old, Mr. Obama added a few words that had not been in the prepared text. The new preface — “with all due deference to separation of powers” — seemed to acknowledge that he was aiming unusual rhetorical fire at several Supreme Court justices sitting right in front of him.
https://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/29/u.../29scotus.html
#TheResistance
#DeepState
"Prez rebuked Alito during a State of the Union"
Grassley LIES
Obama bitched about C-U and the corruption it enabled,
then Alito said something like "(that's) not true".
Obama voted against Alito's confirmation.
=================
"With all due deference to separation of powers, last week the Supreme Court reversed a century of law that, I believe, will open the floodgates for special interests, including foreign corporations, to spend without limit in our elections," Obama said.
"I don't think American elections should be bankrolled by America's most powerful interests or, worse, by foreign entities.
They should be decided by the American people.
And I urge Democrats and Republicans to pass a bill that helps correct some of these problems."
Democratic lawmakers and Obama Cabinet members, surrounding the six of nine justices who turned out for the event, stood and applauded.
The justices, in the front and second rows of the House chamber, sat motionless and expressionless. Except for Alito.
"Not true, not true," he appeared to say (other lip readers think he said, "That's not true")
as he shook his head and furrowed his brow. It is unclear what part of Obama's statement he was objecting to, although he started shaking his head after the president said "special interests."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...012802893.html
Iowa proves itself a shithole by electing Grassley, King
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris
What's your conspiracy theory here, Chris?Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris
Educate us.
Obama judges blocking everything Trump has tried to do since his inception.
To be fair, Trump's appointees have taken wet shits on Trump as well.Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris
... other Repug-appointed judges.Quote:
Originally Posted by Pavlov
Blocking Trash is best for America, bad for AmeriKKKa
So have Bush, Clinton and Reagan appointees... but, thanks Obama!Quote:
Originally Posted by Pavlov
:lolQuote:
Originally Posted by Pavlov
Not to mention, it's clearly the activist judges' fault the king can't overrule Congress...
Lol
Always a great move for the pres to politicize the judiciary
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pavlov
:lolQuote:
Originally Posted by ElNono
Just like the Dems politicized the Brett Kavanaugh nomination hee-haw
:lol Chris falling on his own death traps.
/fatality
It would be phenomenal to watch you go into depth defining what the deepstate isQuote:
Originally Posted by Chris
Brett wasn't a SCOTUS justice when the nomination took place.Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris
Bend over, I'll show you phenomenal and in depth.Quote:
Originally Posted by Isitjustme?
I think its anyone who has been govt more than 10 minutes and doesnt suck Trumps cock iircQuote:
Originally Posted by Isitjustme?
“The 9th Circuit is really something we have to take a look at because it’s not fair." - Trump
:cry
BTW, isn't John Roberts a Bush appointee?
Bush family was worse than Obama.
Bush is deepstate too tbh. as a matter of fact his state runs so deep it put her butt to sleep iircQuote:
Originally Posted by ElNono
But Obama judges, broQuote:
Originally Posted by AaronY
I wonder how it is to live with such severe mental illness.Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris
Deepstate=anyone in govt who doesnt think the MAGA movement is the sharpest sets of ideas ever basically
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_RobertsQuote:
Originally Posted by ElNono
Ask a Liberal.Quote:
Originally Posted by resistanze
You're the only one here crying about deep state and calling actual conservative judges liberals appointed by Obama. :lolQuote:
Originally Posted by Chris
Oh my god :lolQuote:
Originally Posted by Chris
Literally "I know you are but what am I"
:lol :lol
:lmao Bill "pincer move" Mitchel has given his shit take. Chris's night is now complete.
Even Shapiro agrees
Ben Shapiro! Total non-partisan observer!Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris
wow, Ben Shapiro agrees... case closed. :lol
Agreed.Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris
Which is why I think it will be even better if Trump keeps up the good fight against this partisan hacky judge. We're behind you 100% Trump. :tu
Shapiro :lol
And Roberts didn't say judges don't have political bias. He said there's no such thing as "Obama judges" or "Trump judges", ie: judges subservient to specific presidents.
Blaming the judges also distracts from the real issue here, which is whether the directives are constitutional or not. There's obviously more steps to go through to determine that, that's why the whining is unwarranted.
Shapiro was anti-Trump before and after the election, but he is coming around.Quote:
Originally Posted by Isitjustme?
this meme of the 9th circuit being bad because a high% of their reviewed cases are overturned is such bs hysteria tbh :lol
http://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content...s_20180629.pdf
plus the rationale there is almost entirely political. of the 14 ninth circuit cases reviewed, alito/thomas/roberts/kennedy voted to overturn 13 of them, whereas ginsberg/breyer/sotomayor voted to overturn only 6 of them. the statistics are function of having a conservative majority on SCOTUS, not because of ineptitude or incompetency of the 9th circuit judges
Levin AND Shapiro agree?
https://media1.tenor.com/images/1f62...itemid=3545908
It really doesn't take much to get all the Trumpies to turn against anyone Trump doesn't like or gets into an argument with. Talk about mindless drones. :lol
brb need to hear hannity's thoughts before making my decision of whether or not trump is right
WTF?Quote:
Originally Posted by ElNono
judges are politicized conservative or progressive, or in between.
Conservative judges are mostly assholes in the service of the oligarchy and Christian supremacy
"Obama judge" or "Bush judge" implies they pick up a phone and call Obama or Bush before making a decision. Unfortunately, even though it should be obvious that's not the case, Roberts had to spell it out.Quote:
Originally Posted by boutons_deux
Shapiro :lol
^ someone didn't read the article
Quote:
Here’s the reality; the same Left that despises President Trump despised George W. Bush long before him. For the most part, the talk about Trump disgracing the office, the talk about Trump’s toxic personality, the talk about Trump’s divisiveness — all of it is just a cover for the fact that those on the cultural left despise those who aren’t on the political left. They see them as idiots and rubes (W.), or as evil manipulators (Cheney). For them, Trump isn’t an outlier — he’s merely the latest iteration of the dastardly conservative movement that launched with Nixon, extended through Reagan, grew to Bush, and now culminates in Trump. At least McKay is honest enough to admit that simple fact. Trump, for the Left, isn’t a departure from conservatism. He’s just another variation on a theme: All conservatives are evil.
COMMENTS
Which is why, of course, Trump is the president right now. Leftist contempt for conservatives seeps through Hollywood and drips off our television and movie screens. And conservatives responded in 2016 to that contempt by nominating a man who wouldn’t take an insult, who wouldn’t respect the office of the presidency enough to forgo a cultural fight. Those on the right elected Trump more to fight those like McKay than to fight those like Nancy Pelosi. That’s why they revel in Trump’s tweets (see Schitt, Adam) and his willingness to slam anyone who knocks him (see Admiral McRaven). Trump doesn’t take, for lack of a better word, schitt. And conservatives have been taking it for far too long.
:lmao didn't need to. I knew it was going to be hot take bullshit.Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris
Trump’s judicial fantasy: What Chief Justice Roberts could have told him but didn’t
As unusual as Roberts’s comments were,
he could have said so much more, like maybe, you’ve got to be kidding, Mr. President, if you think your judicial problems are confined to “Obama” judges in a single circuit.
He could have noted that the number of rulings against his administration’s actions now stands somewhere in the range of about 40 to 50, according to a rough estimate by The Washington Post.
Norman Siegel, writing at Law.com in January,
counted 37 “major” losses,
and that was in January, before numerous other rulings that thwarted Trump administration decisions.
And he could have observed that all of this is a bit of a surprise. All presidents lose cases.
But a losing streak of this magnitude for a president is a new phenomenon.
Despite the endless decades of rhetoric about “judicial activism,”
judges at the district court level are generally a timid lot
when it comes to confronting presidents. Historically, they are inclined to do what former federal judge Nancy Gertner calls “duck, avoid and evade.”
Perhaps ‘judging in a time of Trump’ ” is different, she wrote. “It is one thing to ‘duck, avoid and evade’ when you believe that official actors are acting more or less within constitutional bounds.
It is another to do so when you are concerned about real abuse of power.”
An abuse of power was what Tigar found: “Whatever the scope of the President’s authority,” he wrote, “he may not rewrite the immigration laws to impose a condition that Congress has expressly forbidden.”
Roberts could have noted that those defeats have come at the hands of judges appointed not just by Democratic presidents
but by Republicans dating all the way back to Ronald Reagan.
how could Trump forget that it was his own appointee, Timothy J. Kelly of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, who slapped down the effort to ban CNN’s Jim Acosta from the White House.
rulings thwarting Trump have also come from judges sitting in New York, Maryland, the District of Columbia, Pennsylvania, Illinois, Massachusetts, Virginia, Michigan and beyond.
Republican appointees outside the 9th Circuit have actually seemed more inclined than others to lecture the president about the Constitution.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/natio...nl_most&wpmm=1
Trash has not gone after the 9th, yet, so I bet his 9th comments were dictated to him to signal that the oligarchy is going to be handing Trash some really nasty candidates for the 9th, which has 6 vacancies.
^low information posterQuote:
Originally Posted by Pavlov
Has your mom told you what's going on with the stock market yet, Chris?Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris
Still waiting on something, anything from Spurstalk stock market hawk Pavlov.Quote:
Originally Posted by Pavlov
You're getting laughter from me because you're so completely ignorant, Chris.Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris
lol Chris
Saw this. Yup, if the districts were apolitical then all the immigration cases wouldn't go to the 9th circuit.Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris
Border state districts hear immigration cases.Quote:
Originally Posted by Spurtacular
Wow!
Gene Lamkin
geneLamkin
Obama criticized the Supreme Court's campaign finance decision.
Justice Alito mouths 'not true' at Obama. Roberts said nothing then. (link: https://youtu.be/BYIV4DwKWyg) youtu.be/BYIV4DwKWyg via
YouTube
https://thepoliticalinsider.com/trum...c3OGJDImR4APWQ
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spurtacular
Amazing how people will abandon common sense just because DRUMPF.
He noted that this is not the first time a president clashed with a chief justice, pointing to Abraham Lincoln's "fierce debate" with Roger B. Taney over Dred Scott and habeas corpus.
"So this is a fight that John Roberts, I think, didn't want to pick," Bennett said. "By the way, when he talks about the independence of the judiciary, I wonder if he tapped Ruth Bader Ginsburg on the wrist when she was criticizing candidate Trump and saying he was a fake and a phony, because that's not really above the fray, is it?"
Where was Roberts when former President Barack Obama actually threatened the Supreme Court prior to their ruling on Obamacare? Obama, you may recall, complained that should the Court rule against the individual mandate, it would be an unprecedented display of judicial activism.
Where were Roberts and the media when the late Senator John McCain and Senator Jeff Flake actually proposed legislation to break up the Ninth Circuit because they viewed it as overly liberal?
Not amazing. They don't have a moral compass.Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris
What is your moral compass, derp?Quote:
Originally Posted by Spurtacular
Check this out. They know the 9th is OP and the ultimate fail safe against Trump.Quote:
Originally Posted by Spurtacular
That you're a compulsive sociopath.Quote:
Originally Posted by Pavlov
Your moral compass is completely based on your perception of me.Quote:
Originally Posted by Spurtacular
That's pretty insane of you, derp.
Yup.Quote:
Originally Posted by Pavlov
:lol Let's Make A DealQuote:
Originally Posted by Chris
That's completely insane of you, derp.Quote:
Originally Posted by Spurtacular
Not acknowledging your sociopathy and expecting different results would be insane.Quote:
Originally Posted by Pavlov
:lol you don't even know what you're saying anymore.Quote:
Originally Posted by Spurtacular
:lol Compulsive sociopath spouting nothing replies....Quote:
Originally Posted by Pavlov
lol :tuQuote:
Originally Posted by Spurtacular
:lmao still posting about meQuote:
Originally Posted by koriwhat
:lolYou said your moral compass is dependent upon your perception of me. You don't even realize how insane that is.Quote:
Originally Posted by Spurtacular
you's a fag, FAG! you's a fag, FAG!Quote:
Originally Posted by Pavlov
btw, i haven't wished death on you yet today pavTheFag. die bitch, die!
Quote:
Originally Posted by koriwhat
What drugs have you taken today?Quote:
Originally Posted by koriwhat
Common sense would be including facts, not excluding them.Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris
Shapiro's garbage is just that, one man's trash opinion that do not measure up.
The actual words coming out of Shapiro's mouth are wildly retarded, he just has a good reputation because he says the words politely.Quote:
Originally Posted by Reck
what drugs do you think i took today?Quote:
Originally Posted by Pavlov
Someday you guys are going to notice that every mature adult in the country, even on the conservative side, thinks your leader is an idiot.
Maybe you'll figure out a way to stay true to your conservative ideology without shilling for an authoritarian narcissist.
who the fuck are you even talking about? btw, got your binkie, blankey, and warm milk?Quote:
Originally Posted by Spurminator
I'm talking about John Roberts, the subject of this thread.Quote:
Originally Posted by koriwhat
Keep working on the insults, Mensa.
Don't know.Quote:
Originally Posted by koriwhat
That's why I asked.
What drugs have you taken today?
:lmaoQuote:
Originally Posted by Spurminator
what a stupid ass reply. you posted right after me which i have to assume your response was towards me. with that said, whose leader is trump exactly? yall fucking sour bitches are all the same; weak losers!Quote:
Originally Posted by Spurminator
what drugs do you think i took today? you brought it up so answer it you fucking fag.Quote:
Originally Posted by Pavlov
Don't know. I think you either took too much or not enough since you're more unhinged than usual.Quote:
Originally Posted by koriwhat
Sorry to trigger you again.
:lol just imagine this guy IRL yelling "fucking fag!" and "I hope you die!" at everyone he disagrees with
http://i45.tinypic.com/14vmbz7.jpg