It would be phenomenal to watch you go into depth defining what the deepstate isQuote:
Originally Posted by Chris
Printable View
It would be phenomenal to watch you go into depth defining what the deepstate isQuote:
Originally Posted by Chris
Brett wasn't a SCOTUS justice when the nomination took place.Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris
Bend over, I'll show you phenomenal and in depth.Quote:
Originally Posted by Isitjustme?
I think its anyone who has been govt more than 10 minutes and doesnt suck Trumps cock iircQuote:
Originally Posted by Isitjustme?
“The 9th Circuit is really something we have to take a look at because it’s not fair." - Trump
:cry
BTW, isn't John Roberts a Bush appointee?
Bush family was worse than Obama.
Bush is deepstate too tbh. as a matter of fact his state runs so deep it put her butt to sleep iircQuote:
Originally Posted by ElNono
But Obama judges, broQuote:
Originally Posted by AaronY
I wonder how it is to live with such severe mental illness.Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris
Deepstate=anyone in govt who doesnt think the MAGA movement is the sharpest sets of ideas ever basically
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_RobertsQuote:
Originally Posted by ElNono
Ask a Liberal.Quote:
Originally Posted by resistanze
You're the only one here crying about deep state and calling actual conservative judges liberals appointed by Obama. :lolQuote:
Originally Posted by Chris
Oh my god :lolQuote:
Originally Posted by Chris
Literally "I know you are but what am I"
:lol :lol
:lmao Bill "pincer move" Mitchel has given his shit take. Chris's night is now complete.
Even Shapiro agrees
Ben Shapiro! Total non-partisan observer!Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris
wow, Ben Shapiro agrees... case closed. :lol
Agreed.Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris
Which is why I think it will be even better if Trump keeps up the good fight against this partisan hacky judge. We're behind you 100% Trump. :tu
Shapiro :lol
And Roberts didn't say judges don't have political bias. He said there's no such thing as "Obama judges" or "Trump judges", ie: judges subservient to specific presidents.
Blaming the judges also distracts from the real issue here, which is whether the directives are constitutional or not. There's obviously more steps to go through to determine that, that's why the whining is unwarranted.
Shapiro was anti-Trump before and after the election, but he is coming around.Quote:
Originally Posted by Isitjustme?
this meme of the 9th circuit being bad because a high% of their reviewed cases are overturned is such bs hysteria tbh :lol
http://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content...s_20180629.pdf
plus the rationale there is almost entirely political. of the 14 ninth circuit cases reviewed, alito/thomas/roberts/kennedy voted to overturn 13 of them, whereas ginsberg/breyer/sotomayor voted to overturn only 6 of them. the statistics are function of having a conservative majority on SCOTUS, not because of ineptitude or incompetency of the 9th circuit judges