I didn't lie. There is no way any of that uranium goes to Russia.Quote:
Originally Posted by Spurtacular
lol derp lied
Printable View
I didn't lie. There is no way any of that uranium goes to Russia.Quote:
Originally Posted by Spurtacular
lol derp lied
Womp womp
lol Darrin still in this thread
Did I interrupt "happy time"?Quote:
Originally Posted by Pavlov
lol Darrin pretending not to careQuote:
Originally Posted by DarrinS
pretending not to support Trump on every single issue
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bonnerific
Here's the whole thing, dummy
:lmao
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C-oWctIwj0s
You weren't qualifying it as an opinion, sociopath. You lied, PERIOD.Quote:
Originally Posted by Pavlov
Pretty much the same nothing burger conversation for two plus years now.Quote:
Originally Posted by DarrinS
:lmao MSM
:lmao Deep state
No, Chump needs a distraction. He just got caught lying about the uranium that Hillary gave (that was sold) to the Russians.Quote:
Originally Posted by DarrinS
The dude stated quite clearly that there will be nothing showing there was Russian collusion or even Trump campaign knowledge about Russian "meddling." You need to stop crying and move on with your life.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bonnerific
Sure,Quote:
Originally Posted by Spurtacular
Mueller has leaked ZERO times -
but suddenly - when the stories that trump might be working for Russia are released....
Suddenly Mueller is leaky?
:lol:lol:lol
How convenient that someone was sent out to spin away the truth....shocking it wasn't Julie-Yanni this time!
Poor gullible cult member :lol:lol
If Mueller wanted a deal with Trump or his kids he’d have called his kids in for an interview. Wrapped up in a investigation of this magnitude, let’s see who hasn’t been called in. Jr, Ivanka, Eric, and even Pence. Kushner may or may not have.Quote:
Originally Posted by Spurs Homer
You don’t want to be that person because if you have not been called in it means they think you have nothing to offer towards a deal and they are clearly targets.
Quote:
Originally Posted by djohn2oo8
Don't forget Barron. That kid is shady AF. :lol
Darrin appearing to care yet again. It bothers you and I like it.
penny for your thoughts Darrin?
I agree with - the criminal trump spawn not being called in - and I would bet that indictments for the criminal traitor family are sealed -Quote:
Originally Posted by djohn2oo8
but they would not be offering deals to the traitor kids - (and don't forget Jared Cuckner)
they would wait until they have trump over a barrel and then show him how bad it looks for the entire traitor family.
It won't really be a "deal" either - it will be more like a "choice"
GTFO out of town and take your criminal spawn with you -
or
The hammer drops on all you disgusting traitors.
Quote:
Originally Posted by djohn2oo8
Looking forward to the Mueller report. :tu
EVERY USA CITIZEN -Quote:
Originally Posted by Bonnerific
SHOULD BE REQUIRED TO READ THIS TIMELINE!
Disgraceful that knowing all this (PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE - PUBLIC FACTS - NOT THEORY/NOT FAKE NEWS/NOT CONJECTURE)
That the cult would still defend the traitor - they must be working for Russia also.
(you know who you are)
Not sure you are because it’s not going to turn out as you hope.Quote:
Originally Posted by DarrinS
:rollinQuote:
Originally Posted by Spurs Homer
:lol GreenwaldQuote:
Originally Posted by TSA
dulpicate :lol Greenwald
Greenwald has really gone over to the Dark Side
Why is investigating the President when the smoke around him and his mafiya (100 contacts with Russians) is extremely thick and hot?
"serious danger" G F Y, GG
How is an investigation "itself a serious danger"?Quote:
Originally Posted by TSA
What's the danger exactly?
Really, the question is why WOULDN'T the FBI start an investigation on him just to see if he's being blackmailed if nothing else?
Why is Trump hiding his conversations with Putin?Quote:
Originally Posted by TSA
Deep state concerns - you know how much Repukes respect the rule of law!Quote:
Originally Posted by Pavlov
TSA wasn’t calling the FBI dangerous when they were investigating Hillary...
The Inspector General Should Review the FBI Counterintelligence Probe into Trump
https://www.lawfareblog.com/inspecto...ce-probe-trump
This guy seems to call out Comey's friend, Benjamin Wittes, who is Editor in Chief of lawfareblog
:wow
Quote:
My concern is that we’re not taking that risk seriously because so many former officials and commentators believe that President Trump deserves all this and more. Some of them still hope that the election of 2016 can be undone, or at least discredited. This leads to a perseverating focus on leaks and scraps from the investigation and a determined lack of concern about the investigation’s sometimes tawdry origins. (Yes, I’m talking to you, #BabyCannon!)
Quote:
Originally Posted by DarrinS
Uh, that was a good thing, Stewie.Quote:
Mark Felt’s effort to succeed [Hoover] included leaks that destroyed Richard Nixon.
:lol muh Nixon
If muh Horowitz investigates this too, it will turn out just like all the other muh Horowitz investigations.
I'm completely fine with investigating all of it, including Trump.
horowitz has amazing job security tbh :lolQuote:
Originally Posted by DarrinS
lol djohnQuote:
Originally Posted by djohn2oo8
Then they'll be happy to tell the relevant House committees, won't they?Quote:
Originally Posted by TSA
Quote:
Originally Posted by TSA
You fuckin' idiot!
Bolton doesn't even know what was said.
Those idiots might have been told by Trump -
what they spoke about - but being told by Trump and actually being there to hear it with your own ears -
are two different things.
In trump CULT - land - though
that is probably enough for you! :lol:lol
Dan Coats literally said no one knows what happened in that meeting. Dipshit :lolQuote:
Originally Posted by TSA
Darrin says FBI bad now but will be the first to call FBI when he sees a black man with a college degree cross his lawn
"This guy denies it, so you're wrong LOL" is a common TSA rebuttal.
???Quote:
Originally Posted by djohn2oo8
I hear you, don't give up your Gay pride.Quote:
Originally Posted by Pavlov
:lol you're the one constantly posting your homosexual fantasies about men here. Take your gay pride in that.Quote:
Originally Posted by DMC
Quote:
Originally Posted by djohn2oo8
lol The Federalist
Susan Rice indictment incoming
Q
Pizza
Mueller's people are unsavory characters. But that's beside the point. I was just recapping what the reporter / pundit said for which boner was in denial about.Quote:
Originally Posted by Spurs Homer
lol mollie hemingway opinion piece published with the federalist
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YEBUNMVP_8k
Yeah, lifelong public servants who have forsaken cushy high paying positions - to serve their country and the rule of law are unsavory -Quote:
Originally Posted by Spurtacular
and
a lifelong liar, tax fraud, traitor, money launderer, draft dodging, cheater - is the GOLD STANDARD OF MORALITY!
In you and Ducks world - ok.
:lol Trump and his people are totally savory!
:lmao Mueller and his minions are altruistsQuote:
Originally Posted by Spurs Homer
Lol, Agent Orange
Lol, the Orangurian Candidate
Nah, I think at worst he's a blackmail victim and covering up.Quote:
Originally Posted by DarrinS
At best he's the worst president in US history.
He doesn’t know what the word means.Quote:
Originally Posted by Pavlov
You can’t deny he lied. Now the question is why...Quote:
Originally Posted by DarrinS
Quote:
Originally Posted by DarrinS
But Trump-hating friends of Comey acting in bad faith? That's just next level tinfoil nuttery.
Comey and his friends are Republican. Darrin. Explain your theory.Quote:
Originally Posted by DarrinS
Ill be waiting
So are Bill Kristol, Joe Scarborough, and Max BootQuote:
Originally Posted by djohn2oo8
:lol
You didn’t explain your theory.Quote:
Originally Posted by DarrinS
Not my theory.Quote:
Originally Posted by djohn2oo8
You should stock up on antidepressants for the Mueller report, btw. :lmao
You said Trump haters. So what’s your theory.Quote:
Originally Posted by DarrinS
Yes, actually.Quote:
Originally Posted by DarrinS
Why start a counterintel investigation when you know nothing will come of it?
Explain your conspiracy theory, Darrin.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pavlov
I would hope an investigation would be launched by good intel and not shady oppo research. It's embarrassing. We're supposed to have the best tech, spycraft, statecraft, etc., but we're relying on the dossier? Wtf
We're not, Derwood. You really haven't been paying attention to anything, have you?Quote:
Originally Posted by DarrinS
You aren't even talking about this investigation.
Why start a counterintel investigation after Comey's firing when you know nothing will come of it?
Explain your conspiracy theory, Darrin.
Trump ‘is a clear and present danger’ to national security’: Ex-DOJ counterintelligence head
https://www.rawstory.com/wp-content/...id-Laufman.jpg
David Laufman served as a federal prosecutor and ran the D.O.J.’s counterintelligence division at the time the FBI, ... began a counterintelligence investigation into President Trump.
“It was a tipping point, among the data points we’re familiar with through the public actions of the special counsel, other investigative reporting,” he explained.
“I spent 25 years in public service, mostly in the national security space and I feel I have a moral obligation to speak up when I see action taken by the president or the members of the administration that in my judgment undermine the national security of the United States.”
“The notion that the president of the united states would be trying to conceal details of conversations with a leader of our principle foreign adversary was positively chilling,”
“I think there’s a culmination of things we can point to in the public record now,
the unbelievable acquiescence to Vladimir Putin in Helsinki,
that was positively shocking to those of us who worked in the national security,
all of the charging documents,
people associated with the president,
all of those point to a reasonable inference —
and it’s a painful anguishing thing to acknowledge — that
the president of the United States is a clear and present danger to the national security of the United States,”
https://www.rawstory.com/2019/01/tru...e+Raw+Story%29
Oh shit, not Maddow!
It's all over, folks. :lmao
None of those quotes is from Maddow.Quote:
Originally Posted by DarrinS
:lolQuote:
Originally Posted by Spurminator
Trump reportedly keeps threatening to pull the U.S. out of NATO. Coincidentally, that's Putin's No. 1 goal.
President Trump told aides numerous times last year that he wants to pull the U.S. out of NATO, essentially destroying the 70-year-old military alliance between the U.S., Canada, and Europe,
Weakening or neutering NATO is perhaps
the top geopolitical goal of Russian President Vladimir Putin,
and Trump's "repeatedly stated desire to withdraw from NATO is raising new worries among national security officials
Mr. Trump's skepticism of NATO appears to be a core belief,
administration officials said,
akin to his desire to expropriate Iraq's oil.
While officials have explained multiple times why the United States cannot take Iraq's oil, Mr. Trump returns to the issue every few months.
Similarly, just when officials think the issue of NATO membership has been settled, Mr. Trump again brings up his desire to leave the alliance.
"Even discussing the idea of leaving NATO — let alone actually doing so — would be the gift of the century for Putin."
"the wildest success that Vladimir Putin could dream of."
https://theweek.com/speedreads/81768...history-lesson
NATO scrapped 70-year anniversary planned for DC —
because of Donald Trump
https://www.rawstory.com/2019/01/nat...e+Raw+Story%29
What are one-on-one pull asides?
probably the worst possible thing imaginableQuote:
Originally Posted by DarrinS
It's a Muslim thing of course.Quote:
Originally Posted by DarrinS
Here Darrin, let this article hold your hand.Quote:
Originally Posted by DarrinS
https://www.politico.eu/article/donl...s-a-big-no-no/
David French argues authority for the FBI CI investigation of Donald Trump comes from an executive order (EO 12333) and was properly predicated based on the following FBI definition of counter-intelligence, which place the focus on the efforts of foreign powers:
The FBI's responsibilities therein are described thus:Quote:
Counterintelligence means information gathered and activities conducted to identify, deceive, exploit, disrupt, or protect against espionage, other intelligence activities, sabotage, or assassinations conducted for or on behalf of foreign powers, organizations, or persons, or their agents, or international terrorist organizations or activities.
https://www.nationalreview.com/2019/...nt-and-proper/Quote:
(g) INTELLIGENCE ELEMENTS OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION. Under the supervision of the Attorney General and pursuant to such regulations as the Attorney General may establish, the intelligence elements of the Federal Bureau of Investigation shall:
(1) Collect (including through clandestine means), analyze, produce, and disseminate foreign intelligence and counterintelligence to support national and departmental missions, in accordance with procedural guidelines approved by the Attorney General, after consultation with the Director;
(2) Conduct counterintelligence activities; and
(3) Conduct foreign intelligence and counterintelligence liaison relationships with intelligence, security, and law enforcement services of foreign governments or international organizations in accordance with sections 1.3(b)(4) and 1.7(a)(6) of this order.
Quote:
for now, this executive edict exists, and it specifically orders the FBI to carry out its part of the American counterintelligence mission.
Why emphasize this order? Because it helps us understand why the FBI would believe it had the authority and responsibility to allegedly open a counterintelligence investigation of the president.
Quote:
If Russia has engaged in “espionage” or “other intelligence activities” to induce the president (knowingly or unknowingly) to act on its behalf, then those actions (and their effects) are within the scope of the FBI’s mission. It’s black-letter law under a currently operative presidential order.
Mueller Draft Report Says Trump 'Helped Putin Destabilize the United States', Watergate Journalist S [View all]
Source: Newsweek
Read more: https://www.newsweek.com/mueller-rep...nalist-1289541Quote:
Mueller Draft Report Says Trump 'Helped Putin Destabilize the United States', Watergate Journalist Says
Legendary journalist Carl Bernstein has said that he’s been told that special counsel Robert Mueller’s report will show how President Donald Trump helped Russia “destabilize the United States.”
Bernstein, who is renowned for his coverage of the Watergate scandal that led to the resignation of former President Richard Nixon, appeared on CNN’s Reliable Sources on Sunday to discuss two bombshell reports released this weekend, one from The New York Times and one from The Washington Post, which revealed new details about whether or not Trump and his aides have colluded with Russia.
The Post reported that Trump has gone to “extraordinary lengths” to conceal direct conversations he has had with Russian President Vladimir Putin. The Times article revealed that the FBI opened a counterintelligence investigation into Trump after he fired former bureau director James Comey in 2017, suspecting the president could be working on behalf of Russia. Trump has angrily denied allegations that he worked with Russia and has regularly attacked the media for reporting on the investigation. But Bernstein slammed Trump’s dismissal of the probe.
“This is about the most serious counterintelligence people we have in the U.S. government saying, ‘Oh, my God, the president’s words and actions lead us to conclude that somehow he has become a witting, unwitting, or half-witting pawn, certainly in some regards, to Vladimir Putin,'” Bernstein explained during his appearance on Reliable Sources .
When the words "I am submitting a report at the end of my investigation"Quote:
Originally Posted by Nbadan
come directly out of Mueller's mouth -
then I will believe this - about a "report"
Otherwise - the law is the law and if there are crimes - there will be indictments - or
there will be an official "no charges filed" if Trump is innocent.
Mueller has never stated that his investigation will result in merely some report.
You're really depending on Mueller to indict the orange menace, aren't you?
Have you considered what your next rhetorical tack might be if he doesn't, Spurs Homer?
dp
Depending?Quote:
Originally Posted by Winehole23
No one is above the law in this country.
Have you considered how many other ways you will sell out the country?
:lol
I've not sold out the USA because I'm not dead certain --- like you -- about an investigatory outcome.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Winehole23
What is causing you to disregard all the public knowledge that confirms that Trump has committed crimes?
SDNY - Co - conspirator in felonies. (statute of limitations run past 2020 - there will be an indictment waiting until trump is out of office)
Tax fraud for decades including not reporting the 400 plus million from daddy.
Mueller investigation -
Fired Comey, Harassed Sessions, Defended the country that attacked the USA (OPEN COLLUSION/OBSTRUCTION), wrote a bogus letter lying about a mtg in trump tower - (OPEN/PUBLIC CONSPIRACY & OBSTRUCTION), Helsinki open betrayal of the usa and a defense of the country that attacked the usa
on and on and on ...
All these are punishable crimes - committed out in the open.
Why are you UNcertain?
Because legal process isn't common sense.
Knowing in your bones you're right doesn't guarantee the outcome you think just.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Winehole23
I agree.
People with agendas could subvert justice. It would be a travesty. It would not have happened if this was the black president who broke laws IN PUBLIC VIEW -
So, yes I agree, the outcome is not certain. Sue me if I stand up for the country and the rule of law and I don't work tirelessly 24/7 to excuse this criminal like his supporters do.
If he gets away with it - it does not bode well for this country and it is baffling why you and his supporters are ok with that.
I'm not a Trump supporter, I just disagree with you sometimes.
Comey was incompetent and a complete buffoon. Trump fired him rightfullyQuote:
Originally Posted by Spurs Homer
LMAOQuote:
Harassed Sessions,
Noone attacked the USA clownQuote:
Defended the country that attacked the USA (OPEN COLLUSION/OBSTRUCTION),
Have any details on this?Quote:
wrote a bogus letter lying about a mtg in trump tower - (OPEN/PUBLIC CONSPIRACY & OBSTRUCTION),
:lmao presidents talking to each other is not betrayal :lmaoQuote:
Helsinki open betrayal of the usa and a defense of the country that attacked the usa
So nothing else?Quote:
on and on and on ...
:lmao none of them are even crimes :lmaoQuote:
All these are punishable crimes - committed out in the open.
:tuQuote:
Originally Posted by Winehole23
:lol if you have enough money, you can be aboveQuote:
Originally Posted by Spurs Homer
just as badQuote:
Originally Posted by Winehole23
you are pootin's stooge
:lol David Laufman working overtime for the resistanceQuote:
Originally Posted by boutons_deux
Involved in over seeing both the Clinton email and Russia investigation. Sat on the interview of Clinton with Strzok. Laufman's name comes up in Strzok/Page texts and he suddenly retires for "personal" reasons. Not done resisting he became the lawyer for Blasey-Ford's FBI friend Monica McClean who was accused of pressuring Leland Keyser to change her statement to the FBI that she had no recollection of any assault by Kavanaugh on Ford.
Just like your dear russian asset -you are full of shit and short on facts.Quote:
Originally Posted by hater
Not worth correcting all your fuckery.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TSA
Yet - everything he said was factual.
TSA continually shitting the bed - per par.
You mean “I dont have any facts or logical stqtements to even start refuting your comments”Quote:
Originally Posted by Spurs Homer
:lmao thanks for playing
Quote:
Originally Posted by hater
Wrong.
The facts are already public.
Comey - head of the russia investigation - fired. Trump bragged to the RUSSIANS - no less - that he fired Comey to "ease the pressure."
Easiest case on the planet to prove - since the idiot did it -
yes -
IN PUBLIC!!!! :lol
It was UNANIMOUS - from the USA intel that Russia cyber-attacked our elections to help Trump - THIS IS A PUBLIC FACT -
unless of course - you are a RUSSIAN who uses the term "fake news"
"presidents talking to each other not betrayal - my ass"
You piece of shit -
when Trump met Putin - all he had to say for the sake of the country - (this country you pos - not russia)
was this:
"I know what you did and there will be consequences - and if you continue - there will be really painful consequences for Russia"
that is it.
Not grovel before him. Not ask him - IF he did it.
Instead the pos traitor - gets in front of the world and basically says;
1) I don't believe or support the USA intel
2) The STUPIDITY of the USA - CAUSED - our bad relationship with russia
3) Putin STRONGLY denied it
4) Fellates the russian in front of the planet
5) Traitors like you - defend this pos - making YOU a piece of shit
Fuck you.
I'm done with you.