Printable View
https://youtu.be/rNvgl38TLvI
Liberal professor estimates that Google sent between 2.6 million and 10.4 million votes to Hillary Clinton in 2016.
But... but... big money donations. Nothing compares to the influence of these tech companies. Also Google's YouTube is now directing traffic from independent news channels to mainstream news outlets on Google.
In 2012, Epstein publicly disputed with Google Search over a security warning placed on links to his website.[10] His website, which features mental health screening tests, was blocked for serving malware that could infect visitors to the site. Epstein emailed "Larry Page, Google's chief executive; David Drummond, Google's legal counsel; Epstein's congressman; and journalists from The New York Times, The Washington Post, Wired, and Newsweek."[10] In it, Epstein threatened legal action if the warning concerning his website was not removed, and denied that any problems with his website existed.[10] Several weeks later, Epstein admitted his website had been hacked, but still criticized Google for tarnishing his name and not helping him find the infection.
...
The Los Angeles Times reported in March 2019 that Epstein's criticism of Google had been "warmly embraced" by conservative sources, a phenomenon that Epstein said "is driving me crazy".[24]
Ben Shapiro: "Congress people being bought and paid for is pretty rare"Quote:
Originally Posted by Nathan89
https://youtu.be/XRxImGwz71s
:lol grinding det axeQuote:
Originally Posted by ElNono
Elaborate.Quote:
Originally Posted by Pavlov
"Ben Shapiro: "Congress people being bought and paid for is pretty rare" "
goddamn, this asshole is fucking 100% bad faith, but it's a great conservative career move
BS is BS, eg some counter-mendacity:
Mitch McConnell's big donors are Wall Street firms — and only 9% of his funds comes from Kentucky
Vast majority of McConnell's campaign funds come from big-dollar, out-of-state donors, many in the financial sector
https://www.salon.com/2019/07/17/mitch-mcconnells-big-donors-are-wall-street-firms-and-only-9-of-his-funds-comes-from-kentucky/
Essentially ALL of the political class is corrupted the oligarchy's BigMoney,
which is why the political class ignores the preferences of voters and enables/enriches/protects the oligarchy,
resulting directly the USA's World Champion Inequality.
BigBanks just posted QUARTERLY profits of $22B, much of it due to them buying the Trump/oligarchy tax cut scam
The biggest threat to the country is NOW, the oligarchy and its blocking all climate legislation, while benefiting from Repugs cutting pollution and oil/gas extraction regulations
That threat is unstoppable, irreversilble
If Trash and Repugs win in 2020, combined with Trash queering the census for insane gerrymandering, then a new US Constitution, paid for by the oligarchy, is probable
Gov't just wants to get their hands on it, get a generous portion of that windfall so they can spend it on shit they want. They just can't figure out how to get their mitts on it. They'll get there though...it's too juicy to pass on.
Like England: they'll keep voting on that Brexit materiel till they get it adjusted properly...once accomplished they'll be no more votes on itPERIOD tee, hee.
Just imagine if we ever discovered Nathan’s twitter account with his 12 followers :lol
:lol well, this thread backfiredQuote:
Originally Posted by ElNono
OP is stuck in the paradigm of Democrats = Evil and Republicans = Jesus. And his side claims to be against identity politics :lolQuote:
Originally Posted by Will Hunting
dumbfucks ranting on youtube for patreon and ad money isn't news.Quote:
Originally Posted by Nathan89
Neither is CNN.Quote:
Originally Posted by Trainwreck2100
Ted Cruz confronts Google with an internal presentation showing how tech companies are leaning toward censorship
https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2019/07/16/...ensorship.html
That article just has internal documents indicating big tech shifting towards censorship.
Like I said big tech is a threat to our country.
These platforms have always been subject to "censorship" by the companies who own them. Do you want child porn on YouTube and murders on Facebook live?Quote:
Originally Posted by Nathan89
I don't. They don't.
Do you?
Yes or no
:lmao Reductio Absurdem from Chump.Quote:
Originally Posted by Pavlov
Do you want child porn on YouTube and murders on Facebook live?Quote:
Originally Posted by Spurtacular
Yes or no.
Dumb.Quote:
Originally Posted by Pavlov
You're not saying no.Quote:
Originally Posted by Spurtacular
Do you want child porn on YouTube and murders on Facebook live?
Yes or no.
X Posts Y Hours Z CompulsionQuote:
Originally Posted by Pavlov
They don't ignore the preferences of voters. They try wall them in with wedge issues so that people vote on those instead of on the issues that actually matter, that the congress and their donors actually care about. It would be more accurate to say they engineer the preferences of the voters, what Chomsky called manufacturing consent.Quote:
Originally Posted by boutons_deux
You want child porn on YouTube and murders on Facebook live.Quote:
Originally Posted by Spurtacular
Psychopav truth. Par.Quote:
Originally Posted by Pavlov
sure they do. Dems voted in Obama for "public option", got ACA, because BigPharma/BigInsurance PREFERRED against public option, as they do now against Medicare-for-all.Quote:
Originally Posted by baseline bum
a majority of Repug voters support DACA, a path to citizenship, same-sex marriage, and are OK with abortion, etc. they get nothing
Repugs scream for immigration reform for 15+ years, they get nothing.
yes, mfr'd consent is real, with BigCorp media helping,
but see the Princeton oligarchy report that claimed voters got about 1% of their preferences, why the oligarchy(BigDonor) got 99%. Even if it's 5/95, the point is valid.
You don't deny it. Par.Quote:
Originally Posted by Spurtacular
How many twitter accounts could there be that have tweets saying both #Bernie2016 and #WhitePower :lolQuote:
Originally Posted by mono
Troglodyte Chump. Par.Quote:
Originally Posted by Pavlov
eg:Quote:
Originally Posted by baseline bum
Southerners Are Scared of the Climate Crisis, and Their Politicians Are Ignoring Them
The states that will be most affected by the climate crisis are the ones with the least political action.
https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/vb9awa/southerners-are-scared-of-the-climate-crisis-and-their-politicians-are-ignoring-them?utm_source=iterable&utm_medium=email&utm_camp aign=campaign_705543
"Twitter has a new feature that automatically suspends anyone who shares certain meme images – including one of which calls for the implementation of voter ID laws."
https://humanevents.com/2019/08/03/t...voter-id-meme/
How are Russian interference and voter ID laws related?Quote:
Originally Posted by Nathan89
Social Media will do just about anything now to keep hold of their cash cow, so that nobody else (Gov't) is allowed to milk said cow. (They) know sooner or later they'll have to share the boodle, the power, but, that's "tomorrow"---today? Every dime & every scrap of power belongs to them. That's something,,,& everyone knows it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Nathan89
Like this:::Quote:
Originally Posted by Pavlov
Trump President.
Not Clinton.
Big tech censorship is the problem I've identified. Seems you've missed that point based on your reply.Quote:
Originally Posted by Pavlov
I'm talking about what caused the ban.Quote:
Originally Posted by Nathan89
On it's face it makes no sense. Were it being propagated by bots, I can definitely see the reasoning for the bans.
What do you think is the motive for banning accounts that post that meme?
If this is all too advanced for you, tell me.
...easy:::to hold onto their boodle with autonomy another week, another day, another hour, another minute,,,"Sure, do it, it won't cost anything & they'll stay outta our hair for another ___days."Quote:
Originally Posted by Pavlov
Didn't read the OP yet... guessing it is along the lines of "BWAAAAH, WE'RE BEING PERSECUTED"
... AND THERE IT IS.Quote:
Originally Posted by Nathan89
I hate big tech as much as the next person, but they are free to censor you all they want. They are free to have left, right, center biases and propagandize those positions all they want. They are fuckin' private companies. I thought conservatives loved the private property concept? Would you rather have big government come down on big tech and dictate to them how they should run their businesses? Aren't conservatives against that sort of thing? Also, don't conservatives believe in the free market? Here's an idea, dig up however many right wing billionaires there are in the world and tell them to start their own googles, facebooks, youtubes, cloudfares where right leaning content is promoted and better disseminated.
Most conservatives are freedom of speech warriors who only believe in freedom of speech on stuff they agree with. They are hacks.Quote:
Originally Posted by midnightpulp
You don't hear the Ben Shapiro's and Steven Crowders defending freedom of speech when Congress tries to pass anti-BDS legislation which is unconstitutional. All them conservatives are silent, crickets, when it comes to anti-BDS bills because they love Israel.
Like the great Noam Chomsky says "if you can't defend freedom of speech agaisnt your enemies then you don't believe in it at all."
Hours after 'denouncing' racism, Trump amplifies views of two other white supremacists
former Google engineer Kevin Cernekee (white supremacist No. 2),
who is making the rounds of fringe media such as Fox News to claim that he has been discriminated against because he's a conservative Trump supporter.
Cernekee told Dobbs that Google executives "want to use all the power and all the resources that they have to control the flow of information to the public and make sure that Trump loses in 2020."
That really stuck with Trump; he went to bed thinking about it and then resumed tweeting about it through the morning.
Cernekee was fired because
he kept sharing white supremacist kinds of things on Google's employee message boards.
Such as how he wanted his co-workers to join him in raising funds
for the "bounty" on the guy who sucker-punched fellow white supremacist Richard Spencer on Trump's inauguration day.
In other internal message board conversations,
Cernekee defended two neo-Nazi groups, the Traditionalist Workers Party and the Golden State Skinheads.
He said the latter group "stood up for free speech and free association" and
suggested that they merely have a branding problem because they call themselves "skinheads."
said in these work discussion boards that they should rebrand as the "Helpful Neighborhood Bald Guys"
they should also "form alliances with other supporters of liberty and civil rights."
The GSS has branding problems beyond its name: It uses Nazi iconography as its identifying symbols.
that's who Trump chose to promote on his Twitter feed Monday night.
It didn't take him any time to get over the deaths of more than 20 people in Texas at the hands of a killer who told the world he was motivated by racist hate and
get right back to his favorite hobby: fomenting that racist hate.
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/201...tail=emaildkre
:lmao asking Dean Cain for help
The "conservative" victimhood
I like how the President can't block people on Twitter but Twitter just shuts down political campaigns. It makes perfect sense.Quote:
Originally Posted by Nathan89
They are a private entity Nathan89. That's what you guys say when NFL owners boycott players for kneeling at the national anthem. Isn't your Republican team supposed to be in favor of privatizing everything? Well there is your lovely privatization.Quote:
Originally Posted by Nathan89
I personally don't think conservatives have never wanted a free press, or even a balanced one. They want all media to be Fox News-style propaganda.Quote:
Originally Posted by TheGreatYacht
Because when you show them truly neutral coverage, or something that shows any different views, they call it liberal bias.
President is a public official.Quote:
Originally Posted by Nathan89
Twitter is a private company.
Not sure why that is difficult for you to understand.
Should a private company not be able to police its content?
:lmao the conservatives didn’t want to touch this post with a 10 ft pole.Quote:
Originally Posted by midnightpulp
Twitter Censors Numerous Accounts In Egypt Amid Protests For "Intent To Manipulate The Conversation"
https://youtu.be/5_QvrPamax8
It's the rightwingnut jobs, the rightwing hate media that bitch the most about being censored,
because they are the ones inciting violence, spreading hate, bullshit, lies, slander, which is ALL they do.
Rupublicans "we need to repeal the fairness doctrine"
Repeal the fairness docrtine
Republicans "these guys aren't being fair"
Incel Shitposts Are Making People Nervous About the Joker Premiere
Concern over the movie grew over a summer of mass shootings.
https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/evj5ep/incel-shitposts-are-making-people-nervous-about-the-joker-premiere?utm_source=Iterable&utm_medium=email&utm_ campaign=campaign_817587
hyperbole by the incels themselves... the left!Quote:
Originally Posted by boutons_deux
US Government Wants Access To Your WhatsApp Messages
https://youtu.be/IBymkRbF3so
“Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.”
-- Benjamin Franklin
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheGreatYacht
Twitter Editor Exposed As Military PsyOps Officer
https://youtu.be/kvCKLLMPVNw
The New Google "Transparency Act" Ignores The Real Problem, As Google Funds Undisclosed Media Groups
https://youtu.be/xwPSwSUkUrM
Both YouTube (Google) and Facebook are dictating what journalists can discuss.
Facebook is in the tank for the left:Quote:
Originally Posted by Nathan89
https://www.businessinsider.com/face...warren-2019-11
1) Facebook says they'll delete posts with the name of the whistleblower.Quote:
Originally Posted by Nathan89
2) Dumbass posts the name of the whistleblower.
3) Facebook deletes dumbass' post.
4) OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOUTRAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAaAGE!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!
If Repugs imagined, in their febrile imaginations, that BigTech was censoring the left, then Repugs would LOVE and protect BigTech.
BigFinance, the oligarchy will destroy, will spend $100Ms and more to block Warren and Bernie, with critical assists from DNC/Clinton faction/corporatist Dems
Wealthy liberals, progressives are totally CONSERVATIVE when their wealth is in play.
Yes, the name has been covered by news outlets. He is providing commentary on the news. It's moronic to not be outrage at a monopoly platform dictating news.Quote:
Originally Posted by ChumpDumper
Facebook silencing the "4th estate".
"I don't have a problem with that."
:lmao
chump is a dipshit leftist cultist... that's why he's for "private businesses" doing whatever they can to suppress the news if it goes against the left's narrative. there's no getting through to idiots like him.Quote:
Originally Posted by Nathan89
as well chump is a fucking retard. facebook's policy is to censor the whistleblower's name if it has not been reported on but it has and has been for weeks now in a few different outlets. facebook is specifically making up new rules after the fact and in doing so they're dictating the direction of people looking for news; the direction would take a hard LEFT!
When I type anything that has to do with politics on the YouTube search I get nothing but CNN, Fox News, MSNBC, etc. JewTube is fucking garbage. I have to dig through a long list of corporate mainstream propaganda to find any old videos. Most of the awakening stuff has been removed. So sad.
YT is a pos these days for sure and have most def been bought by the MSM.Quote:
Originally Posted by TheGreatYacht
If you rely on FB to print the news, you're neither a publisher nor a journalist.Quote:
Originally Posted by Nathan89
WSJ investigation finds bias for big businesses, against subscription model competitors and, yeah, blacklists:
https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2019...r-results.htmlQuote:
Despite maintaining in Congressional testimony that it doesn’t use blacklists, the WSJ account found that Google does. Google tries to wiggle around this apparent contradiction by relying on a narrow interpretation of what constitutes a “political” blacklist:
Google’s first blacklists date to the early 2000s, when the company made a list of spam sites that it removed from its index, one of those people said. This means the sites wouldn’t appear in search results.
Engineers known as “maintainers” are authorized to make and approve changes to blacklists. It takes at least two people to do this; one person makes the change, while a second approves it, according to the person familiar with the matter.
The Journal reviewed a draft policy document from August 2018 that outlines how Google employees should implement an anti-misinformation blacklist aimed at blocking certain publishers from appearing in Google News and other search products. The document says engineers should focus on “a publisher misrepresenting their ownership or web properties” and having “deceptive content”—that is, sites that actively aim to mislead—as opposed to those that have inaccurate content.
“The purpose of the blacklist will be to bar the sites from surfacing in any Search feature or news product sites,” the document states.
Sounds legit
https://www.theverge.com/platform/am...-senate-letterQuote:
To ask for video footage, the company says, police must provide a specific case number, but otherwise doesn’t require any evidence for police to request footage.
In one notable exchange, Amazon explained the scope of videos police can request. In addition to requesting up to 12 hours of video produced in the last 45 days, police can ask for footage within a maximum of 0.5 square miles.
30 yo Nathan, Koriwhut?, Boots, The Great Floating Turd...
We got the extreme nuts covered.
Add hater and Chris to round out the selection.
Amazon Is Opening Grocery Stores & Why Thats Bad
https://youtu.be/7yPHCM4bpwU
“The US is one of the safest countries for trans people,” Ngo posted in the tweet that earned him a suspension. “The murder rate of trans victims is actually lower than that for cis population. Also, who is behind the murders? Mostly black men.”
https://www.dailywire.com/news/journ...r-suspends-him
Twitter banning journalists for posting inconvenient information. These people running these companies are disgusting.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nathan89
Twitter silently American citizens/ journalists because they don't like the information should bother Americans tbh
Is this dude one of them blind patriots? Is he a Zionist? If yes, then he is just as ignorant and blue pilled as those strawman leftists he claims to hate.Quote:
Originally Posted by Nathan89
I remember my first bottle of cough syrup.Quote:
Originally Posted by Nathan89
Maybe less cough syrup and more anger next time. Your approach seems half-throttled.
That's irrelevant.Quote:
Originally Posted by TheGreatYacht
Probably a dumb suspension but lol Andy anyway.
Wrong. When you're not a blind patriot and recognize that the United States and Israel are the real axis of evil then you will finally break away from the left vs right paradigm. Until then, you are just a sheep.Quote:
Originally Posted by Nathan89
Ten days before the Presidential election, McNamee sent an e-mail to Zuckerberg and Sandberg.
“I am disappointed. I am embarrassed. I am ashamed,” he wrote.https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2019/12/02/big-techs-big-defector?utm_campaign=aud-dev&utm_source=nl&utm_brand=tny&utm_mailing=TNY_Ma gazine_Daily_112519&utm_medium=email&bxid=5bd67955 24c17c1048022fcc&cndid=43758549&esrc=&mbid=&utm_te rm=TNY_Daily
Recently, Facebook has done some things that are truly horrible and I can no longer excuse its behavior. . . . Facebook is enabling people to do harm. It has the power to stop the harm. What it currently lacks is an incentive to do so.
dispatched a Facebook executive, Dan Rose, to talk to him.
Rose told McNamee that Facebook was a platform, not a publisher, and couldn’t control all user behavior.
But Rose’s dismissiveness rattled him.
“They were my friends. I wanted to give them a chance to do the right thing. I wasn’t expecting them to go, ‘Oh, my God, stop everything,’ but
I was expecting them to take it seriously,” he said.
“It was obvious they thought it was a P.R. problem, not a business problem, and they thought the P.R. problem was me.”
McNamee hasn’t spoken to Sandberg or Zuckerberg since. (Both declined to comment for this article.)
He now refers to Zuckerberg as an “authoritarian.”
Zuckerberg's wealth gives him enormous power (his control of shares means shareholders and the board can't touch him) but he remains a prick way in over his head. Just listen to his bullshit spewed to Congress.
As long as the ad money $Bs keeps rolling in, FB won't change.
Dr. E Michael Jones Goes On Infowars To Discuss ADL Tech Censorship
https://www.bitchute.com/video/qH2MIG2HnU76/
ducks koriwhat Spurtacular Nathan89 Chris CosmicCowboy DMC DarrinS SnakeBoy Chucho Millennial_Messiah FrostKing
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EKJXUmNU8AANwf6.jpgQuote:
Originally Posted by TheGreatYacht
so you wanted to make a mockery of me a while back when you tried to pin me as an infowars/alex jones fan but here you are peddling his show? wtf?Quote:
Originally Posted by TheGreatYacht
either way, i don't hate AJ because i'm pretty damn open minded but i truly don't know much about the man, his show, etc...
as for the ADL, it's a shit organization just like the SPLC so what's your point? the jews?! ok...
either way, stop mentioning me in all your jewtube shit and bitjew shit... i truly don't care and i literally have no stake in the jewish community. i believe you're losing your damn mind buddy and you might need to find a new hobby outside of the jew cabal.
SBC is just upset because we all know he'd rather suck a dick than play with his wife's kibble and bits. fuck that 2face idiot.Quote:
Originally Posted by TheGreatYacht
Dont @ me, you anti semite piece of shit.Quote:
Originally Posted by TheGreatYacht
Thank me now, thank me later but those same people you like to defend want open borders and want to replace your white race. Diversity is their strength.Quote:
Originally Posted by Chucho
So any criticism of Jews, Zionism or Israel is antisemitic? You mean the Zionist elites should get away with anything while we keep our mouths shut? Is that what you want? Please tell me why.
This Place Is Broken. We Are Fucked
https://youtu.be/2nDDdNPlquQ
Jews, not “zionists”Quote:
Originally Posted by TheGreatYacht
Motherfuckers :flipoff
Banned by PayPal & News | KMN LIVE
https://youtu.be/hBuflFOTr-I
It's about time!:clapQuote:
Originally Posted by TheGreatYacht
This research is way above the IQ of all y'all rightwingnutjob Trash fellators, so you can skip it
Facebook Has Already Decided How You’re Going To Vote
Facebook is wielding significant power over political discourse in the United States,
thanks to an ad delivery system that reinforces political polarization among users,
Facebook delivers political ads to its users based on the content of those ads and the information the media company has on its users—
and not necessarily based on the audience intended by the advertiser.
“We found that Facebook will disproportionately deliver an ad
to the users who [Facebook] believes agree with the ad, based only on the content,”
its ad delivery system is creating information filter bubbles for its users,
citizens are being served ads that reinforce their existing political beliefs, and
being excluded from seeing ads that challenge those beliefs.
“I don’t think most people understand the level of optimization that’s taking place in online advertising,” he says.
“When Facebook is optimizing ads for relevance,
they’re also optimizing for Facebook’s profit margin.”
in an attempt to optimize the success of the ad,
Facebook’s algorithm is delivering it to people it believes are predisposed to like it.
Such optimization isn’t unique to political ads, Mislove says; it’s likely the same system Facebook uses to determine the relevance of every advertisement on its site.
it is a problem for an ad that’s intended to change the mind of a voter who’s not already on board with the message.
the results illustrate
a broader problem in society today—
the sheer amount of influence that unseen and unregulated algorithms have on everything we do.
there’s very little accountability,
and very little transparency,
about how these algorithms determine what that optimization looks like.
https://scienceblog.com/512662/facebook-has-already-decided-how-youre-going-to-vote/
‘Our jaws hit the floor’:
Why a shocking new report on cellphone tracking is absolutely terrifying
an investigation into smartphone tracking based on a data set with over
50 billion location pings from the devices of more than 12 million people in the United States.
The data, from 2016 and 2017, “was provided to Times Opinion by sources who asked to remain anonymous because they were not authorized to share it and could face severe penalties for doing so,” explained reporters Stuart A. Thompson and Charlie Warzel.
“The sources of the information said they had grown alarmed about how it might be abused and urgently wanted to inform the public and lawmakers.”
https://www.rawstory.com/2019/12/our-jaws-hit-the-floor-why-a-shocking-new-report-on-cellphone-tracking-is-absolutely-terrifying/?utm_source=&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=3281
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/12/19/opinion/location-tracking-cell-phone.html
Obviously, Congress, and BigNetwork whore Pai, will get right on the problem. :lol :lol :lol :lol
This spying shit is horrible will get only worse, as BigNetwork buys protection from Congress and regulators.
Saudí Propaganda & Spying Litters Social Media
https://youtu.be/Pgwel9u-hmQ
Twitter Might Kill The Best Thing About It
https://youtu.be/pJRWvFP_soU
Twitter gonna make echo chambers for all the left-wing and right-wing snowflakes and elitists to shut down truth-tellers.