Re: trump impeachment watch thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
hater
keyword “joined him”
this is politics. no politician loves another. that is dysneyworld thinking
do you think democrats love pelosi, shumer? do you think democratic congress ppl love Hillary? :lol
wake up nobody loves anyone in politics. they just join the winner or whoever will benefit them the most qnd in republicans case its the trump train
its one thing to have private thoughts but leading republicans were publicly calling him out as an asshole and idiot before he became the nominee :lol... its not in the same realm as what you're talking about
not remotely the same
lindsey graham called trump a jackass, a race baiting, xenophobic, religious bigot, compared his election to getting shot in the head, etc.
ted cruz called trump a "sniveling coward" on camera after trump mocked his wife
romney called trump a phony and a fraud in front of an audience
even cocaine mitch called him out as needing an experienced VP because its obvious he wasnt knowledgable about the issues
Re: trump impeachment watch thread
yes that was 4 years ago.
:rolleyes
now its a different world and its Trumps world. Republidumbs have been either tamed by donald or obliterated.
its called the Stockholm Syndrome. look it up :lol
Re: trump impeachment watch thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
hater
its called the Stockholm Syndrome. look it up :lol
:lol exactly
Re: trump impeachment watch thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
baseline bum
smooth-talking New York City conman
:lol
ain't nuthin smooth
Trash can only manage early grade school vocab and syntax, not to go over the low-ed heads of the cult mob.
That wasn't his purposeful strategy, that language level is all that fucked-up brain can manage now.
Just coincidence that his simplistic language matched the simple-mindedness of his cult mob.
Re: trump impeachment watch thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
spurraider21
:lol exactly
:tu
Re: trump impeachment watch thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Spurs Homer
Anyone see that oval ofc pic with lavrov standing behind trump?
if i was the secret svc agent responsible for that
id fucking retire
any president who invites a russian into the oval office and then is comfortable enough to sit down and calmly pose for a pic with our biggest enemy standing behind him
is either plain fucking stupid
or does NOT consider russia worth being aware of - and on top of his game
either way
its fucking disgraceful
if i really wanted to give trump the benefit of the doubt
id say - fire the head of secret service assigned on that detail
but i think it is no accident that the russian achieved the exact pic he wanted sent to russia
let that sink in
yup - called it
(unlike HATER - when I call it - it happens)
Disgraceful traitor - even russia openly promotes it!
https://www.thedailybeast.com/russia...mp-their-agent
Re: trump impeachment watch thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
boutons_deux
:lol
ain't nuthin smooth
Trash can only manage early grade school vocab and syntax, not to go over the low-ed heads of the cult mob.
That wasn't his purposeful strategy, that language level is all that fucked-up brain can manage now.
Just coincidence that his simplistic language matched the simple-mindedness of his cult mob.
Emotional angry outbursts are smooth talk to ears trained for years by Hannity, Limbaugh, Ingraham, Pirro, etc.
Re: trump impeachment watch thread
Re: trump impeachment watch thread
Lindsay Graham with the Aryan Master Race hair coloring
https://www.rawstory.com/wp-content/...sey-Graham.jpg
Re: trump impeachment watch thread
Re: trump impeachment watch thread
boom! ^
:cry:cry " gotta find SOMETHING - to protect dear leaders narrative!"
:rollin:rollin
Re: trump impeachment watch thread
Looking forward to this whole thing dying in the senate.
Dems would have been better off going after Donnie for violating the emoluments clause. Accepting money from the Saudis thru his hotels is much more provable then the whole Russia-gate bs.
oh well, enjoy the ratings boost rebubs. 4 more years of the Donald
Re: trump impeachment watch thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Spurs Homer
boom! ^
:cry:cry " gotta find SOMETHING - to protect dear leaders narrative!"
:rollin:rollin
Pretty much. It is all backfill at this point.
Re: trump impeachment watch thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TSA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Brevan
Trump May Win Elusive Latino Support for the GOP
:lol
Catholics are viewed as serving Satan by the evangelicals in the fascist party.
Good luck with that.
:lol information bubble
Re: trump impeachment watch thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
RandomGuy
:lol
Catholics are viewed as serving Satan by the evangelicals in the fascist party.
Good luck with that.
:lol information bubble
Brevan didn’t write that article dipshit :lol
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/ar...op_141963.html
Trump May Win Elusive Latino Support for the GOP
By Steve Cortes
My network, CNN, released a poll last week of California voters. The survey revealed a remarkable level of support for the president from minority voters in the deeply Democratic state. In a head-to-head matchup with present front-runner Joe Biden, Donald Trump earns 32% support from non-white Californians. His support vs. Elizabeth Warren, Pete Buttigieg, and Bernie Sanders also registers percentages in the low 30s.
If Trump can garner a third of the minority vote in a state that provided the entirety of Hillary Clinton’s popular vote surplus in 2016, then on a national basis the Democratic Party faces a daunting, and perhaps even impossible, uphill climb to unseat the president. In fact, national polling displays pronounced support for this president among Hispanics. For example, The Hill published a poll in September showing his Hispanic approval at 37%. Then a November Emerson poll found similar 38% Latino approval. In a related surprise, that same Emerson survey rocked the political world with a 34% approval rating for the president among black voters.
Re: trump impeachment watch thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
hater
do you really think this would go any different in senate with some other republican besides Mitch??
really?
Might or might not. Ie: replace Mitch with Romney and I think we may be having a different convo. Same if McCain would still be around.
But it doesn’t matter, Mitch ensures this is not going anywhere.
Re: trump impeachment watch thread
not "both sides-ism" with Mitch vs anybody else.
He has been singularly aggressive in fucking up Obama, fucking up Federal judgeships, blocking 100s of bills passed by the House, and now approving Trash's crimes as OK with Repugs. And of course, all the Repugs agree as the Repug party is now fully degraded and exposed by Trash.
Scorched-earth obstruction by Mitch is the Repug strategy protecting the oligarchy.
If the Repugs can't move their destruction of America and govt forward, then obstruct any and all solutions, progress by the Dems.
The oligarchy's rigged status quo is protected by Repug obstructionism.
Bitch is more dangerous, more destructive than Trash.
Re: trump impeachment watch thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
RandomGuy
:lol information bubble
Re: trump impeachment watch thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ElNono
Might or might not. Ie: replace Mitch with Romney and I think we may be having a different convo. Same if McCain would still be around.
But it doesn’t matter, Mitch ensures this is not going anywhere.
So replace Mitch with a dead guy and we might have a different scenario? really?
Re: trump impeachment watch thread
Giuliani drops stunning confession — and undermines Trump’s defense against impeachment again
Giuliani admitted that he got former American ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch fired
so that he could more easily pursue his efforts to dig up dirt on former Vice President Joe Biden.
“I believed that I needed Yovanovitch out of the way,” he said.
“She was going to make the investigations difficult for everybody.”
Giuliani also admitted that
he recruited former Hill columnist John Solomon
to help him spread negative information about Yovanovitch.
““I said, ‘John, let’s make this as prominent as possible,’ ” Giuliani said.
“ ‘I’ll go on TV. You go on TV. You do columns.’ ”
https://www.rawstory.com/2019/12/giuliani-drops-stunning-confession-and-undermines-trumps-defense-against-impeachment-again/?utm_source=&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=3248&re cip_id=298460&list_id=1
so, Ukraine corruption as a Trash defense is dead.
Withholding $400M to extort Z was all about slandering the Bidens to enhance Trash's re-election chances.
Re: trump impeachment watch thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
boutons_deux
Giuliani drops stunning confession — and undermines Trump’s defense against impeachment again
Giuliani admitted that he got former American ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch fired
so that he could more easily pursue his efforts to dig up dirt on former Vice President Joe Biden.
“I believed that I needed Yovanovitch out of the way,” he said.
“She was going to make the investigations difficult for everybody.”
Giuliani also admitted that
he recruited former Hill columnist John Solomon
to help him spread negative information about Yovanovitch.
““I said, ‘John, let’s make this as prominent as possible,’ ” Giuliani said.
“ ‘I’ll go on TV. You go on TV. You do columns.’ ”
https://www.rawstory.com/2019/12/giuliani-drops-stunning-confession-and-undermines-trumps-defense-against-impeachment-again/?utm_source=&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=3248&re cip_id=298460&list_id=1
so, Ukraine corruption as a Trash defense is dead.
Withholding $400M to extort Z was all about slandering the Bidens to enhance Trash's re-election chances.
It’d be wise if you read the full story that shit rag raw story pulled it from.
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2...ps-impeachment
Re: trump impeachment watch thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TSA
It would be wise if you would STFU with your trivial, deflecting bullshit and conspiracy crap
Re: trump impeachment watch thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TSA
Ah. Twitterati name dropping.
Much more credible. :lol
smh
Re: trump impeachment watch thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TSA
It’d be wise if you read the full story
:rollin
Read the Mueller report yet?
Re: trump impeachment watch thread
Imagine judging the merits of impeachment based on public support, and then imagine using impeachment support numbers that are higher than Nixon's and Clinton's to bolster your case.
You can tell who's learning history in real time on Twitter.