Could be your reply to anything not about Trump tbh.Quote:
Originally Posted by DarrinS
Printable View
Could be your reply to anything not about Trump tbh.Quote:
Originally Posted by DarrinS
That's not what I said to you and I don't have a conspiracy theory, just a best case "deaths to go" count. I said you were misinterpreting the data to satisfy your conspiracy theory because you hadn't looked at the actual data, just some tweet or something.Quote:
Originally Posted by RandomGuy
That was true, you just proved it
Quote:
Originally Posted by RandomGuy
Sad thing is you are still misinterpreting the data. It's publicly available and analyzing data is supposed to be your strong suit. I'm not going to do it for you no matter how much you beg. Put in more effort.Quote:
Originally Posted by RandomGuy
Moderna?Quote:
Originally Posted by DMC
You want sympathy, tell em one person died. 10,000 deaths is just a statistic.Quote:
Originally Posted by hater
WrongdomGuy has been crying on here for a year. He has said the following.Quote:
Originally Posted by SnakeBoy
1. Kids would die if schools opened, colleges included
2 this would be worse than Spanish flu.
3. The Ozarks would all die from memorial day.
4. Sturgis would all die
5. Every hospital in New York Texas South Dakota Georgia and Florida would be over capacity.
6. Lockdowns and masks work
7. No age level was safe....
He did brag about data, but doesn't even understand how cases or deaths are identified.
He's low. Then he gets belligerent and uses profanity.
LoloooloollQuote:
Originally Posted by RandomGuy
WrongdomGuy thinks that every excess death from last year is covid. When covid only makes up 3 pct of deaths. Lol
Data
I asked you to outline your theory about the excess deaths, and you...Quote:
Originally Posted by SnakeBoy
haven't.
and no, it wasn't a "tweet".
If I am misinterpreting it, you should be able to show how. You are full of shit, so you won't. Don't have to beg, the burden of proof is on you.
Your claim, "RG is misinterpreting the data", your burden.
The core of modern conservatism is dishonesty. Intellectual honesty would demand you support a claim made, if you could.
You make my point for me with every snarky, lying post. You make kmy point for me by the omission here.
I don't have to ask at all. Just let you be you, and I win by default, you dishonest sub-par intellect. :lol
I told you. He doesn't understand data. Then when he realizes what he has said is completely illogical, he cusses. CoronabroQuote:
Originally Posted by RandomGuy
^ gossip
I never proposed a theory, I have no burden of proof. You have admitted you were misinterpreting the dataQuote:
Originally Posted by RandomGuy
Quote:
Originally Posted by RandomGuy
You are still in errorQuote:
Originally Posted by RandomGuy
I'm not doing your work for you no matter how much you beg.Quote:
Originally Posted by RandomGuy
WrongdomGuyQuote:
Originally Posted by tholdren
:lolQuote:
Originally Posted by SnakeBoy
You try, so, so, hard.
Yes or no, is there a difference "misinterpreting" X and recalculating X with new data once it becomes available?
lastly:
Nothing in my post was begging you. Quit flattering yourself.
The fact that you have shrugged off your burden of proof lets me use that as proof that conservatives are generally dishonest. This makes me happy.
To top it off, you are adding the lie that I am begging you to make yourself feel better about your delusions.
To be honest, the only real data I have about you, is that your posts almost exclusively consist of distortions and strawman takes on others, i.e. lies.
I have caught you more than once letting your delusions about reality fuck up your ability to determine what is real and what isn't. I assume you thought "white millenials are fleeing the Democratic party"
This only makes me conclude, that you are probably lying when you say I am in error. Straight up, made up, 100% bullshit.
What I think:
You don't even believe that lie.
Further, your need to own the libs is so great that if you could show up ol' RG, you would. It is what small sub-par intellects like you do.
I am reasonably sure it's all you are capable of. Once in a while you crawl out of your shell to try, but it is never with any real honesty.
Notice none of this is a request that you do jack shit. Just pointing out your dishonesty and inability.
Your claim, your burden of proof. Because you are a dishonest and delusional fuck, you shrug it off. I am content with you never, ever responding.
I win either way.
I was honest enough to recalculate when asked and then evaluate my position based on new evidence.
You... aren't. Suck it.
Unless Biden's team can perform miracles, I bet the herd immunity goal of 200M vaccinated won't happen in 2021, which apparently will see more highly contagious variants running wild.
1M dead Americans by 2022?
A couple 100Ks disabled "long haulers", all age groups?
Guess who the Repugs will blame in the 2022 campaign for the pandemic and its economic disaster for the non-oligarchy?
So he does peddle medical supplies.Quote:
Originally Posted by SnakeBoy
I wonder if he has a date for his 2nd.
others have mentioned it, it's worth stressing again, because soon this will be the dominant strain in the USA.
the B. 1. 1. 7 variant is ~50-75% more contagious than the one we're dealing with now.
be safe!
https://www.technologyreview.com/202...inates-the-us/Quote:
Some scientific leaders say the US should now consider a coordinated national lockdown period. “I think we have to aggressively consider the upsides, and the downsides, of another lockdown to crush the curve,” says Ali Nouri, president of the Federation of American Scientists (FAS). “We are hitting record numbers of cases and deaths, and on top of it we are dealing with a situation where we may be confronted with a highly transmissible variant. It’s going to exacerbate a situation that is already stretching hospitals to the breaking point in some areas. It’s a really bad situation.”
I started moving to a cash position yesterday. My assumption is that we will see another flatten the curve shutdown.Quote:
Originally Posted by Winehole23
One can hope that the trade off of being more transmissable comes with the price of being less likely to hospitalize/kill.Quote:
Originally Posted by Winehole23
... and we have heard NOTHING from Fauci / CDCQuote:
Originally Posted by Winehole23
What?Quote:
Originally Posted by RandomGuy
I have not seen anything that says B117 is less severe than the original
I was merely hoping that it would be. I doubt it has been around long enough to tell if it is or not. My hope, not any knowledge on my part.Quote:
Originally Posted by boutons_deux
Mutations often have more than one effect, and often come with trade-offs.
COVID never takes a day off, but the Trump Administrtion checked out well before the electionQuote:
Originally Posted by boutons_deux
Not sure about that. Cuomo already said he cannot wait for vaccines as NY is facing financial armageddon. He said he will open up instead. Also schools already thinking of opening more as teachers are getting vaccineQuote:
Originally Posted by SnakeBoy
But there is a bigger chance of lockdown w Biden coming in too. Who knows
Europe is already closing its borders to yet another mutation from South America.
If we are gonna have a new strain every week we are in for a rough ride
CDC prediction
"About 38,000 Americans died from COVID-19 in the past two weeks, but the CDC is projecting that a staggering 92,000 more will die in the next three weeks."
-- Boston Globe email