RIP Mini Mike: Audio leaks show Bloombergs racist views

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spurminator

People who were Republicans in the past have been pushed to the Democratic Party because of Trumpism, which is now the definition of Republicanism.

---

Not many, because Trump is the exact kind of leader Limbaugh and Hannity and the rest of ClearChannel + Fox have been priming the Republican base into wanting for 20 years. Kudos to Bannon I guess for recognizing it.

The concern for the Democratic Party is valid in terms of the possibility that Bloomberg-types can create a socially progressive but still oligarchical juggernaut that forever maintains power simply by being the better option to the Theocrat/conservative but also oligarchical party.

I think the eventual result of that is a hybrid populist party pulling from less-socially-conservative former Trump supporters and the far left. For me, a two-party system of a socially progressive Wall Street party vs. a socially progressive socialist/populist party is far preferable to the status quo, even if it takes a few more elections to get there.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Will Hunting

Truth bombs.

They liked Biden because he was Obama’s VP (even though Obama only picked him as a VP to try and appeal to whites) and ignored Biden’s shit track record on crime....now they like Bloomberg because of a superficial super bowl ad that had a black woman in it even though Bloomberg supported stop and frisk policing :lol

To be fair it’s not black millennials, it’s the middle aged and older black voters who go to church every Sunday and listen to their pastor tell them who to vote for after shouting “oh lawdy!!!” for three hours because they can’t think for themselves.

---

Vanessa could announce her candidacy tonight and win 100% of the black vote in the California primary.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spurminator

The concern for the Democratic Party is valid in terms of the possibility that Bloomberg-types can create a socially progressive but still oligarchical juggernaut that forever maintains power simply by being the better option to the Theocrat/conservative but also oligarchical party.

I think the eventual result of that is a hybrid populist party pulling from less-socially-conservative former Trump supporters and the far left. For me, a two-party system of a socially progressive Wall Street party vs. a socially progressive socialist/populist party is far preferable to the status quo, even if it takes a few more elections to get there.

---

Me too but it’s naive to think that’s happening as long as 30% of the country votes for whichever candidate talks about outlawing abortion the most,, and I certainly don’t see how the Democratic Party becoming the party of Michael fucking Bloomberg gets us there.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Splits

Vanessa could announce her candidacy tonight and win 100% of the black vote in the California primary.

---

If Pete Buttplug changed his last name to Clinton he’d probably be beating Biden in South Carolina right now :lol

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Will Hunting

Me too but it’s naive to think that’s happening as long as 30% of the country votes for whichever candidate talks about outlawing abortion the most,, and I certainly don’t see how the Democratic Party becoming the party of Michael fucking Bloomberg gets us there.

---

That's the scenario I described though. A Democratic Party that appeals to everyone from Bloomberg to Sanders is too big to survive forever. Abortion won't last forever as a wedge issue either, but I'm sure something else will be dreamt up. Probably some bullshit about pronouns.

Spurminator random love for Bloomberg is odd. The many Ls he's taking here is well deserved. Who would even think about voting for this guy?


I'd vote for anyone running in the dem side but won't for Bloomberg or Klobuchar.

Buttigieg I'm 50/50 on but I think he'd lose to Trump badly. Probably Trump's easier oponent because he won't have to do much. HE'S A FAG, MY EVANGELICALS, GO SHOW HIM WHAT WE CAN DO!

The end. :lol

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Reck

Spurminator random love for Bloomberg is odd. The many Ls he's taking here is well deserved. Who would even think about voting for this guy?

I'd vote for anyone running in the dem side but won't for Bloomberg or Klobuchar.

---

I'm not participating here for imaginary W/L's on an imaginary internet scoreboard scored by people who pick the thread majority's side and say nothing of substance. I respect BB and WH's opinions but I disagree. I haven't said anything to defend Bloomberg against other Democrat candidates, nor would I. I've only "defended" him against the idea that he's worse than Donald Trump. I'll do the same for Klobuchar if you're capable of that level of discussion.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Reck

Spurminator random love for Bloomberg is odd. The many Ls he's taking here is well deserved. Who would even think about voting for this guy?


I'd vote for anyone running in the dem side but won't for Bloomberg or Klobuchar.

Buttigieg I'm 50/50 on but I think he'd lose to Trump badly. Probably Trump's easier oponent because he won't have to do much. HE'S A FAG, MY EVANGELICALS, GO SHOW HIM WHAT WE CAN DO!

The end. :lol

---

Why Klobuchar? I think she’d be an awful candidate and is another moderate corporatist, but I’d definitely vote for her over Trump.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Will Hunting

Why Klobuchar? I think she’d be an awful candidate and is another moderate corporatist, but I’d definitely vote for her over Trump.

---

Your random love for Klobuchar is odd.

:lol

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Will Hunting

Why Klobuchar? I think she’d be an awful candidate and is another moderate corporatist, but I’d definitely vote for her over Trump.

---

Because she's terrible on a scale even beyond that of Hillary. Mostly annoyed by her talking points she doesn't even bother to tweak.

She can be summarized in one sentence.

I have won everywhere I ran so that's why I'll beat Trump!

The difference between Klobuchar and Pete is that Pete has a limited enthusiasm to him. At least with whites and younger people.

But he's got problems of his own though.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Splits

Black voters are the least informed and most shallow in the entire electorate, they vote on name recognition. Shit, they backed Hilary over Obama even after several primaries were completed solely because of her last name and they were too stupid to figure out Obama was black.

---

:lol what color did they think "Barak Obama" was?

Middle eastern maybe cuz it sounds like Osama?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Reck

Because she's terrible on a scale even beyond that of Hillary. Mostly annoyed by her talking points she doesn't even bother to tweak.

She can be summarized in one sentence.

I have won everywhere I ran so that's why I'll beat Trump!

---

This isn't a defense of voting for Trump over Klobuchar, this is you saying Klobuchar annoys you. Why do you prefer Donald Trump to Klobuchar?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spurminator

This isn't a defense of voting for Trump over Klobuchar, this is you saying Klobuchar annoys you. Why do you prefer Donald Trump to Klobuchar?

---

When ever did I say I'd vote for Trump instead? Maybe you did have too much caffeine.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Reck

When ever did I say I'd vote for Trump instead? Maybe you did have too much caffeine.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Reck

I'd vote for anyone running in the dem side but won't for Bloomberg or Klobuchar.

---

Did I misunderstand this sentence? If I did, then that means you agree with me about Bloomberg. Which is it?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spurminator

Did I misunderstand this sentence? If I did, then that means you agree with me about Bloomberg. Which is it?

---

Obviously you did because nowhere in those posts or anywhere in this entire board will you find where I said I'd vote for Trump over x.

Keyword, in dem side.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Reck

Obviously you did because nowhere in those posts or anywhere in this entire board will you find where I said I'd vote for Trump over x.

Keyword, in dem side.

---

So you posted an entire hype man rant about how I'd be stupid to vote for Bloomberg when you have the same exact position.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spurminator

So you posted an entire hype man rant about how I'd be stupid to vote for Bloomberg when you basically feel exactly the same way.

---

Or you know...I would just stay home and not vote for either if they become the nominee. Which I would do. I wouldn't vote for Bloomberg under any circustances.

Maybe you'll get my point accros now Bloombergnator. :lol

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Reck

Or you know...I would just stay home and not vote for either if they become the nominee. Which I would do. I wouldn't vote for Bloomberg under any circustances.

Maybe you'll get my point accros now Bloombergnator. :lol

---

"I'd vote for anyone running in the dem side but won't for Bloomberg or Klobuchar" is a really weird way to say "I'll stay home if Bloomberg or Klobuchar is the nominee" so you can understand my trouble deciphering it. But fair enough. I'll ask it this way: Why are you equally okay with a Trump re-election vs. a Bloomberg or Klobuchar Presidency?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Reck

Because she's terrible on a scale even beyond that of Hillary. Mostly annoyed by her talking points she doesn't even bother to tweak.

She can be summarized in one sentence.

I have won everywhere I ran so that's why I'll beat Trump!

The difference between Klobuchar and Pete is that Pete has a limited enthusiasm to him. At least with whites and younger people.

But he's got problems of his own though.

---

I think she’s equally as unelectable as a woman with a bitchy personality but at least to me she doesn’t seem like a completely soulless politician the way Hillary did.

Not trying to defend her I just don’t think she’s on the same level as Bloomberg in terms of Democrats abandoning their ideals.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spurminator

"I'd vote for anyone running in the dem side but won't for Bloomberg or Klobuchar" is a really weird way to say "I'll stay home if Bloomberg or Klobuchar is the nominee" so you can understand my trouble deciphering it. But fair enough. I'll ask it this way: Why are you equally okay with a Trump re-election vs. a Bloomberg or Klobuchar Presidency?

---

I'm just 1 vote so How do you figure a Trump re-election? It's a personal choice and people might feel different about them. But most seem to be in agreement that he's just out there buying votes for the sake of buying votes.

I find Bloomberg abhorrent.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Will Hunting

I think she’s equally as unelectable as a woman with a bitchy personality but at least to me she doesn’t seem like a completely soulless politician the way Hillary did.

Not trying to defend her I just don’t think she’s on the same level as Bloomberg in terms of Democrats abandoning their ideals.

---

I do agree on the last part. Like I said, my dislike for Amy is more to do with annoyance rather than pure hatred (I know its a strong word) for bloomberg.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Reck

I'm just 1 vote so How do you figure a Trump re-election? It's a personal choice and people might feel different about them. But most seem to be in agreement that he's just out there buying votes for the sake of buying votes.

I find Bloomberg abhorrent.

---

It's always just one vote. Why vote ever?

But you're right, it's your choice. Just like it's my choice to vote for a jar of feces if it's the Democratic candidate against Donald Trump.

Glad we could find common ground. :tu

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by spurraider21

---

God, stopping Russian troll efforts more important than stopping an oligarch hijacking the party? Fuck off Nancy.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by baseline bum

God, stopping Russian troll efforts more important than stopping an oligarch hijacking the party? Fuck off Nancy.

---

Not a surprise coming from Nancy and the establishment wing.

Black chick on MSNBC saying blacks are pragmatic and won't care about this

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by baseline bum

So yeah, the party is dead to me if they push Bloomberg through to the nomination so burn it to the ground then.

---

Bloomberg is a Republican. He's also racist AF.

Can he buy the Democratic Party nomination?

If so, burn it all down.

It seems to me Bloomberg is the most laser focused on beating DJT of the field, and has virtually unlimited money to play with.

Can he do it?

No idea.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Winehole23

It seems to me Bloomberg is the most laser focused on beating DJT of the field, and has virtually unlimited money to play with.

Can he do it?

No idea.

---

laser focused? the midget? :lmao if by laser focused you mean an oligarch spending his millions to buy and election then mmmmok :lol

PRESENT AF

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SnakeBoy

Black chick on MSNBC saying blacks are pragmatic and won't care about this

---

:lmao Chumpettes are "pragmatic" too. They'll clutch their pearls today and vote for him tomorrow if they have to. :lmao

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SnakeBoy

Black chick on MSNBC saying blacks are pragmatic and won't care about this

---

Sounds about right.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spurtacular

:lmao Chumpettes are "pragmatic" too. They'll clutch their pearls today and vote for him tomorrow if they have to. :lmao

---

thats not clutching pearls

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by spurraider21

thats not clutching pearls

---

Derp is here for attention. He's not really concerned about using the phrases he uses correctly or making any kind of real argument about anything. Every response is, "well this is what's happening" and when people ask him to elaborate he just posts emojis and says they know what he's talking about but are in denial. Remember the whole name the crimes thing?

He knows what he's doing.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by benefactor

Derp is here for attention. He's not really concerned about using the phrases he uses correctly or making any kind of real argument about anything. Every response is, "well this is what's happening" and when people ask him to elaborate he just posts emojis and says they know what he's talking about but are in denial. Remember the whole name the crimes thing?

He knows what he's doing.

---

I remember it. Chump defined himself as a sperm shielder by it. Do your remember that? Or is your memory entirely self serving?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by spurraider21

thats not clutching pearls

---

Pretty much. Maybe there was some hyperbole there; but otherwise when it comes to street crime, Little Mikey was in the ballpark if not on the mark.

Whoever's idea it was to flood my podcasts with his horrible ads should lose their job, it's having the opposite effect of what they intended:lol

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Winehole23

It seems to me Bloomberg is the most laser focused on beating DJT of the field, and has virtually unlimited money to play with.

Can he do it?

No idea.

---

I think Bloomberg will surprise a lot of people on super tuesday.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CosmicCowboy

I think Bloomberg will surprise a lot of people on super tuesday.

---

If it were Trump and Bloomberg atop the ticket, so you vote for Bloomberg or do you leave the top spot empty?

They don't seem to have a problem with their blackface candidates so I don't see why this has to be a problem. Canadian leftists also didn't have a problem with their blackface candidate.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Nathan89

They don't seem to have a problem with their blackface candidates so I don't see why this has to be a problem. Canadian leftists also didn't have a problem with their blackface candidate.

---

How is Bloomberg a "blackface"?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Th'Pusher

If it were Trump and Bloomberg atop the ticket, so you vote for Bloomberg or do you leave the top spot empty?

---

Probably leave it empty.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CosmicCowboy

I think Bloomberg will surprise a lot of people on super tuesday.

---

I won't be surprised at all by Bloomberg doing well on Super Tuesday given the way he is carpet bombing the airwaves in Texas.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CosmicCowboy

Probably leave it empty.

---

Why? With Bloomberg you'd get low taxes on the rich enshrined as agenda item #1 for both parties at only the cost of an assault rifle ban for four years.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by baseline bum

Why? With Bloomberg you'd get low taxes on the rich enshrined as agenda item #1 for both parties at only the cost of an assault rifle ban for four years.

---

It's more his position on registration I have an issue with.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CosmicCowboy

It's more his position on registration I have an issue with.

---

He’d never get his gun agenda through both houses of Congress, and I doubt he’d even try that hard to push it. Gun control is just the pet issue he uses to make people think he’s a Democrat.

I can't believe some ppl treat Mini Mike as serious option :lmao

I guess this country is in more of a shit state than previously thought :wow

Bernie or bust.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Nathan89

They don't seem to have a problem with their blackface candidates so I don't see why this has to be a problem. Canadian leftists also didn't have a problem with their blackface candidate.

---

Nathan

um there is a big difference between wearing a black face in halloween and ordering your police force to invade black hoods and throw kids against the walls

Bloomberg: the end of red-lining caused the 2008 financial panic.

ttps://apnews.com/8cbb1fafbb4faf01e8d9571363979501

ChumpDumper

You ran as far away as you could get on this one. :lmao

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spurtacular

ChumpDumper

You ran as far away as you could get on this one. :lmao

---

?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Reck

?

---

Late night cry for attention, tbh.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by baseline bum

I won't be surprised at all by Bloomberg doing well on Super Tuesday given the way he is carpet bombing the airwaves in Texas.

---

I dont get it. Do ads make a difference anymore?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Reck

?

---

Tough riddle, tranny?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Reck

I dont get it. Do ads make a difference anymore?

---

Nothing else explains how Bloomberg went from <1% to 10-15%.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Winehole23

Nothing else explains how Bloomberg went from <1% to 10-15%.

---

Yea, nothing else. :lol

ChumpDumper still running. :lmao

Comforting himself in the Flynn thread and going on the offensive in The Club to avoid taking a stance. :lmao

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spurtacular

Yea, nothing else. :lol

---

What explains it, in your opinion?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spurtacular

ChumpDumper

You ran as far away as you could get on this one. :lmao

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spurtacular

ChumpDumper still running. :lmao

Comforting himself in the Flynn thread and going on the offensive in The Club to avoid taking a stance. :lmao

---

:lmao crying out for me in the night again.

Pretty much a nothingburger.

And I don't like Bloomberg.

I will allow you to start your narrative now.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ChumpDumper

:lmao crying out for me in the night again.

Pretty much a nothingburger.

And I don't like Bloomberg.

I will allow you to start your narrative now.

---

:lmao You had to be called out twice, and then you came here with both barrels blasting narrative. :lmao

Is Little Mikey fit to be president?

Yes or no.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spurtacular

:lmao You had to be called out twice, and then you came here with both barrels blasting narrative. :lmao

Is Little Mikey fit to be president?

Yes or no.

---

Yes.

Not that I care.

You cried out for me in the night twice in 30 minutes.

You're really thirsty.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ChumpDumper

Yes.

---

So, his comments are not racist?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spurtacular

So, his comments are not racist?

---

Which comments?

Let's be exact here.

Something tells me you don't even know what he said.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ChumpDumper

Which comments?

Let's be exact here.

Something tells me you don't even know what he said.

---

Stop stalling. You know what this thread is about.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Winehole23

Nothing else explains how Bloomberg went from <1% to 10-15%.

---

First impressions, then?

People should already know this guy is a serial flip flopper. Republican, Democrat, Independent, to Republican and then Democrat again when it suited him.

Once people hear him talk on the debates hopefully he can go the fuck away.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spurtacular

Stop stalling. You know what this thread is about.

---

You don't.

Post those quotes. Let's discuss them.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ChumpDumper

You don't.

Post those quotes. Let's discuss them.

---

Bloomberg's speech in the OP. Was it racist?

Yes or no.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spurtacular

Bloomberg's speech in the OP. Was it racist?

Yes or no.

---

Can't play audio where I am.

Post the quotes.

Let's discuss them.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ChumpDumper

Can't play audio where I am.

Post the quotes.

Let's discuss them.

---

Videos don't work on your phone?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spurtacular

Videos don't work on your phone?

---

They work.

I'm not at a place where I can hear audio.

Post the quotes.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ChumpDumper

They work.

I'm not at a place where I can hear audio.

Post the quotes.

---

:lol Acting like you haven't heard it already....

Quote:

---

“They are male, minorities, 16 to 25. That’s true in New York, and that’s true in virtually every city. And that’s where the real crime is.

“You want to spend the money on a lot of cops in the street, put those cops where the crime is, which means in minority neighborhoods.

“One of the unintended consequences is people say, ‘Oh my god, you are arresting kids for marijuana that are all minorities.’ Yes, that’s true. Why? Because we put all the cops in minority neighborhoods . . . why do we do it? Because that’s where all the crime is.

---

Yep. Not racist.

And I don't like Bloomberg.

You may now continue your narrative forming rant.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ChumpDumper

Yep. Not racist.

And I don't like Bloomberg.

You may now continue your narrative forming rant.

---

So profiling not racist now?

LOL Dump

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spurtacular

So profiling not racist now?

LOL Dump

---

Where is the profiling in your quotes?

Explain.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ChumpDumper

Where is the profiling in your quotes?

Explain.

---

He outlined a criminal profile and targeted them accordingly. This isn't hard shit, Chump.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spurtacular

He outlined a criminal profile and targeted them accordingly.

---

You're going to have to show where he actually did that or fold.

I predict you will fold really quickly and cry about it for days.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ChumpDumper

You're going to have to show where he actually did that or fold.

I predict you will fold really quickly and cry about it for days.

---

Quote:

---

Because we put all the cops in minority neighborhoods . . . why do we do it? Because that’s where all the crime is.

---

:lmao Could you be more of a sperm shielder?

^^^

This is your leader, Chumpettes.

:rollin

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spurtacular

:lmao Could you be more of a sperm shielder?

---

That isn't actually profiling, but you are really, really stupid after all.

:lol derp

You may now meltdown over this.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ChumpDumper

That isn't actually profiling, but you are really, really stupid after all.

:lol derp

You may now meltdown over this.

---

He literally had his cops searching out people of a certain profile. You can't be this stupid?

You think he's this stupid, spurraider21?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spurtacular

He literally had his cops searching out people of a certain profile.

---

That isn't what he said in any of your quotes.

Guess you can try again.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ChumpDumper

That isn't what he said in any of your quotes.

Guess you can try again.

---

:cry He was just talking pretend-like :cry

:lmao Psychopath

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spurtacular

:cry He was just talking pretend-like :cry

:lmao Psychopath

---

derp folds.

As predicted.:tu

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ChumpDumper

derp folds.

As predicted.:tu

---

And now you're comforting yourself. Par.

:lol This is why you had run so very far away.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spurtacular

And now you're comforting yourself. Par.

:lol This is why you had run so very far away.

---

:lmao You cried out for me twice in 30 minutes.

I'm right here.

You're folded and you will never unfold.

This is why you will cry and cry and cry and never discuss this again.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ChumpDumper

:lmao You cried out for me twice in 30 minutes.

I'm right here.

You're folded and you will never unfold.

This is why you will cry and cry and cry and never discuss this again.

---

IIRC I called three or four times for you to join this thread before you finally did.

You didn't want any part of this thread b/c you know Little Mikey got caught with his hand in the cookie jar.

But :lol that you have to sperm shield this hard just in case he wins the nomination. :lmao

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spurtacular

IIRC I called three or four times

---

:rollin
:rollin
:rollin
:rollin
:rollin
:rollin
:rollin

^^^

Chump unhinged. Sperm shielding this hard after running so fast and far away is just tough on the little guy. :lmao

hater You got to read that exchange between me and the board psycho. :lmao

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spurtacular

hater You got to read that exchange between me and the board psycho. :lmao

---

Start a thread to vote who the board psycho really is. I dare you.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Blake

Start a thread to vote who the board psycho really is. I dare you.

---

:cry Chump a legion of followers :cry

:lmao Cuckold Blake

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Reck

First impressions, then?

People should already know this guy is a serial flip flopper. Republican, Democrat, Independent, to Republican and then Democrat again when it suited him.

Once people hear him talk on the debates hopefully he can go the fuck away.

---

Does Bloomberg qualify for the debate stage? Serious question.

Even if he did, why would he do it? More bad things than good things can happen to him on a live stage.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Winehole23

Does Bloomberg qualify for the debate stage? Serious question.

Even if he did, why would he do it? More bad things than good things can happen to him on a live stage.

---

While I agree, it's just no fair to Biden that he has to expose himself out there while midget mike doesn't

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Winehole23

Does Bloomberg qualify for the debate stage? Serious question.

Even if he did, why would he do it? More bad things than good things can happen to him on a live stage.

---

The DNC dumped the donor money. There is now no threshold to meet. All you have to do is meet a couple of poll % and you're in.

Conviniently done once Bloomberg got in.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Reck

The DNC dumped the donor money. There is now no threshold to meet. All you have to do is meet a couple of poll % and you're in.

Conviniently done once Bloomberg got in.

---

Thanks, the midstream rules changes by the DNC have been numerous, if you blink you could miss one.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ElNono

While I agree, it's just no fair to Biden that he has to expose himself out there while midget mike doesn't

---

Money can't buy happiness, but maybe it can buy the Dem nomination. Failing that, it might get Bloomberg enough delegates to be a kingmaker at a brokered convention, which maybe was the point all along.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spurtacular

:cry Chump a legion of followers :cry

:lmao Cuckold Blake

---

Mumble Mumble cuck Mumble Mumble /emoticon

You're such a flaming pussy