I wonder what would happen if he were to threaten to run independent like Trump threatened to doQuote:
Originally Posted by Winehole23
Printable View
I wonder what would happen if he were to threaten to run independent like Trump threatened to doQuote:
Originally Posted by Winehole23
Trump would win a plurality, like Clinton in 1992. Maybe the Republican billionaire Bloomberg wants Trump to win. We know that Bloomberg spent upwards of 10 mil to keep the US Senate red in 2016.Quote:
Originally Posted by Blake
See, I might think Mike might take a lot of the Republican votes away from Trump vs him taking votes away from say Bernie.Quote:
Originally Posted by Winehole23
Dem centrists were never too keen on Bernie, in fact seem keen on anyone but. A Dem split obviously favors Trump.Quote:
Originally Posted by Blake
Big Cuck On CampusQuote:
Originally Posted by Blake
:lol
...it may as it draws down come to that.Quote:
Originally Posted by Blake
Trump never threatened that.Quote:
Originally Posted by Blake
Ankle biter modeQuote:
Originally Posted by Spurtacular
Don't make your false cuck claims, blake.Quote:
Originally Posted by Blake
Why is it false?Quote:
Originally Posted by Spurtacular
Because it's not true. Tough stuff, tranny.Quote:
Originally Posted by Reck
It is true. It's a ridiculously easy Google search.Quote:
Originally Posted by Spurtacular
But you're a retarded low iq ankle biter tho.
OTOH, of Bloomberg wins in Nov., the Trump/Bloomberg succession would prove that wealth in and of itself is a threat to our system of government. If people are rich enough to simply buy the highest power in the land for themselves, democracy is broken.Quote:
Originally Posted by Winehole23
You too?Quote:
Originally Posted by Winehole23
I can see why so many people keep saying they'd vote for Trump over Bloomberg when this oversimplified narrative keeps getting spread.
https://www.politico.com/story/2016/...k-donor-230861
It's already broken.Quote:
Originally Posted by Winehole23
Oversimplified how?Quote:
Originally Posted by Spurminator
It's a straight fact that Bloomberg was a lifelong Republican until 2019 and that he helped keep the Senate red three years ago.
I said that a Trump/Bloomberg succession would prove it's broken, not that it isn't already, but yeah, I agree.Quote:
Originally Posted by Spurminator
Any Chumpettes claiming Bloomberg wasn't touting profiling?
Or maybe it's because he's an opportunist that would back whoever is favorable to win? Bloomberg boosted Republican majority in the senate last cycle so fuck him and his shithead supporters.Quote:
Originally Posted by Spurminator
No one in this thread, that I've seen.Quote:
Originally Posted by Spurtacular
What's your take on racial profiling, Spurtacular?
:lol you still on this?Quote:
Originally Posted by Spurtacular
Go ahead and show us the threat, or stop lying.Quote:
Originally Posted by Blake
Translation: :cry Leave Chump alone :cryQuote:
Originally Posted by Reck
:lmao
If you want to keep talking about a non issue 2 days in a row, go for it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Spurtacular
Without it we stop and frisk little ole grannies at airports.Quote:
Originally Posted by Winehole23
If that were true, it'd be happening already.Quote:
Originally Posted by Spurtacular
The very issue of the OP is a non issue.Quote:
Originally Posted by Reck
:lmao Dumbass tranny
NoQuote:
Originally Posted by Spurtacular
Blakehole in his own reality.Quote:
Originally Posted by Winehole23
Cos you can't, cuck.Quote:
Originally Posted by Blake
Blake and Reck having a stupid-off right now.
:rollin
Blake did a number on you. Everyone is Blake and Blake is everyone to you. Mind fuckedQuote:
Originally Posted by Spurtacular
Bloomberg is the spoiler Tulsi couldn't be.
Let's wager on it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Spurtacular
:lol Bragging about a cuckQuote:
Originally Posted by Reck
:lol Yoked with Blake.
Okay. If you win, you're a cuckold. If you lose, you're a cuckold.Quote:
Originally Posted by Blake
My money is on you're a cuckold.
You're a pussy. You're always gonna be a pussy.Quote:
Originally Posted by Spurtacular
And a fucking idiot.
All those tears cos you were called out on lying about Trump. :lmaoQuote:
Originally Posted by Blake
You called, I raised. Do you understand poker?Quote:
Originally Posted by Spurtacular
I called you out on your lie, and you folded. Do you understand that?Quote:
Originally Posted by Blake
:lol you bet I was wrong, I raised and now you're squirming.Quote:
Originally Posted by Spurtacular
Here's the raise: I show proof, you leave the political forum for good. If I can't do it, I'll leave the forum for good.
Now everyone watch as derp squirms some more, calls me names, and says how I'm somehow the one folding.
You know I don't do bets with you ST. This is the same as a tapout for you.Quote:
Originally Posted by Blake
:lol "squirms"
:lol Cuckold wants so bad to impress Chump.
Yeah, we're done here. Your skirt is up, your pussy is fully exposed.Quote:
Originally Posted by Spurtacular
We're done cos you tapped out and lashed out.Quote:
Originally Posted by Blake
The bet is on the table, pussy. It's as clear and simple as it gets.Quote:
Originally Posted by Spurtacular
But you're just a pussy.
Your tapout is done.Quote:
Originally Posted by Blake
Looks like another apology incoming
You begin to understand why he said he doesn’t need to be on the debates. :lolQuote:
Originally Posted by SnakeBoy
He would get exposed nationally in two seconds.
Yeah he would do well to stay away and just run a social media campaign.Quote:
Originally Posted by Reck
Really he should just never speak. I heard a clip of him attempting to connect with voters by telling a childhood story. It was about how the housekeeper always let his mother win at scrabble :lol
hes basically Mr Charles Montgomery Burns in real life :lmao
lolQuote:
Originally Posted by hater
And Trump was a lifelong Democrat before a black man was elected POTUS. It's not surprising now that the GOP has moved further to the extreme right that some former Republicans have either become, or begun supporting, Democrats.Quote:
Originally Posted by Winehole23
The narrative is oversimplified because Bloomberg spent far more money supporting Democrat candidates (and causes like Planned Parenthood) in 2016. The idea that all of that spending was just a cover for his real objective to keep the Senate red in 2016 is just silly.
I don't like that any billionaire can sway public opinion with corporation-level advertising budgets, but that's the state of our elections at the moment and I don't really understand what's fundamentally different about the Kochs, Adelsons, Soroses, NRA, and Waltons funding their preferred candidates vs. someone funding himself. The latter seems preferable to me, even if both options suck.Quote:
I said that a Trump/Bloomberg succession would prove it's broken, not that it isn't already, but yeah, I agree.
And you still have to win voters. It's a little patronizing to suggest that people are such lemmings swayed by advertising that appealing to them though advertising is "buying an election." The real crisis of Bloomberg's rise is that he hasn't had to participate in debates and answer any tough questions yet from the public.
tee, hee.Quote:
Originally Posted by Spurminator
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spurminator
:lol
https://abruptearthchanges.files.wor...-extremism.jpg
I don't think I implied that, but that's a good point. Realignment is messy.Quote:
Originally Posted by Spurminator
That's a problem for sure, but I think that the real crisis is that the Democratic party may prefer the kinder gentler fascism that Bloomberg represents to the left wing of their own party.Quote:
Originally Posted by Spurminator
That said, I'll vote for any sentient adult against DJT.
This is at best a non-sequiter, at worst a chart that proves my point by showing Republican values shifting to the left even while the party trends rightward. The only issue that Republican leadership moved left on since 1994 is gay marriage.Quote:
Originally Posted by DarrinS
But I welcome an argument that Donald Trump is more liberal than Ronald Reagan and GHWB, or Mitch McConnell more liberal than Newt Gingrich, if you want to try to make it.
this is basically Bloombergs campaign :lmaoQuote:
Originally Posted by Trill Clinton
(Drudge) is reporting that Bloomberg ran the numbers & is going to tap Hillary as his running mate.
I don’t see it unless there’s a backroom agreement for Hillary to either take over at some point or to be a Dick Cheney style VP. Not a chance she’d even want a true VP role if it was offered to her.Quote:
Originally Posted by Thread
I wouldn’t cast a vote for president if my choices are trump/pence and Bloomberg/clintonQuote:
Originally Posted by Thread
Drudge isn't reporting it. He's linking a report from the Daily Mail.Quote:
Originally Posted by Thread
Mike Bloomberg for years has battled women’s allegations of profane, sexist comments
from legal complaint:
". On April 11, 1995 at approximately 11:20 a.m., Bloomberg was having a photograph taken with two female Company salespeople and a group of N.Y.U. Business School students, in the company snack area.
When Bloomberg noticed Garrison standing nearby, he asked, “Why didn’t they ask you to be in the picture? I guess they saw your face.”
Continuing his penchant for ridiculing recently married women in his employ, Bloomberg asked plaintiff, “How’s married life? You married?”
Plaintiff responded that her marriage was great and was going to get better in a few months: that she was pregnant, and the baby was due the following September.
He responded to her “Kill it!”
Now, as Bloomberg is increasingly viewed as a viable Democratic candidate for president and the #MeToo era has raised the profile of workplace harassment,
he is finding that his efforts to prevent disclosure are clashing against demands
that he release former employees and complainants from their nondisclosure agreements.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/graph...wpisrc=nl_most
So I was a bit with the melo & the dramatic,,,don't nitpick, Dumps.Quote:
Originally Posted by ChumpDumper
Thank God, I feel a bit better now. I about lost my second cup of coffee at first blanch.Quote:
Originally Posted by spurraider21
De Blasio endorsed Bernie. He hates Bloomberg tbh :lol
That's probably precisely the plan, Will. He'll take the first couple years, then give it over to her for the next 6.Quote:
Originally Posted by Will Hunting
I didn't read the article, I just ran like the dickens back over here to be first at lodging it.
It’ll never happen but during the next debate one of the other candidates should put Bloomberg on the spot and ask him to promise he’s not picking Clinton as his VP and then eviscerate him if he doesn’t.
Has there ever been a time in modern American history where the candidate who lost 4 years earlier gets picked as the veep by the next candidate? I can’t think of one in recent memory where it was ever remotely considered, and that’s for good reason. No one up until now has been retarded enough to even contemplate it.
The establishment/moderate Dems have lost their fucking minds in terms of having a winning strategy.
Makes sense to me, Will. She came within 70k votes up in the belt of winning last time after she'd quit a fortnight before Election Day. He's got the cash, she's got the organization loaded in the catapult launcher.Quote:
Originally Posted by Will Hunting
He just wants the old man out & he wants to provide the foot in the that generous ass + wants to match him as President, but, he'd be fine with passing the baton almost immediately.
+ we'd get to see Weiner's wife (what's her name?) with that blood red lipstick again. She had me snortin' like a wild man.
CNN still ain't joined in on it. They hate when they ain't the bearer of such a juicy story. Get their back up, their stubborn on.
The demographic makeup of this country is such that any Dem candidate could have “made it close” against Trump. The Democrats don’t need either of the country’s two biggest swing states (Ohio and Florida) to win anymore - four states that were solid red in 2004 (New Mexico, Colorado, Nevada and Virginia) are now either lean blue or solid blue states. You’re giving her too much credit for “almost” winning an election that was hers to lose.Quote:
Originally Posted by Thread
Theres no group of voters she wins with that Bloomberg doesn’t already win with. We saw how well it went for her when she nominated a redundant bland centrist as her VP rather than someone who could turn out the base.
+ During Stop-and-Frisk’s peak in 2011,
nearly 90 percent of those stopped were black and Latino, and
nearly 90 percent were innocent, according to date from the ACLU of New York.
+ Stop and Frisk stats over the course of Mike Bloomberg’s 12 years as NYC mayor:https://www.counterpunch.org/2020/02/14/roaming-charges-leader-of-the-pack/
2002: 97,296
2003: 160,851
2004: 313,523
2005: 352,348
2006: 506,491
2007: 472,096
2008: 540,302
2009: 581,168
2010: 601,285
2011: 685,724
2012: 532,911
2013: 191,851
Gabbard would have made sense at some point but i think she’s torpedoed herself pretty hardQuote:
Originally Posted by ChumpDumper
I would.Quote:
Originally Posted by spurraider21
You would if you were living in a swing state.Quote:
Originally Posted by spurraider21
:lol Lite
Iirc he lives in Virginia which I think would absolutely be a swing state with a Bloomberg/Clinton ticket.Quote:
Originally Posted by Spurtacular
Trumps never going to win the black vote, but you can bet that if he were to run against Bloomberg he’d convince a good enough chunk of black voters to stay at home with repeated attacks on stop and frisk.
Yes, hurt us to lose those 4 states like that. They just drifted away in broad daylight. We were aghast. Our recognition of the loss was tardy & our insistence to stubbornly try & recapture them is foolish. Just walk-a-way. They're gonePERIODQuote:
Originally Posted by Will Hunting
She'll capture & goose to the voting booth that [[[hard ass woman vote]]] in solid numbers...they've been waiting her surfacing & now Bloomberg may provide that push.
I'm sick over this fresh prospect that's declared this morning, but, it's a strategy without a downside in my opinion. Choosing some upstart jackass youngster with a big mouth would prove inert. Rodham will bring something to the ticket on-contact.
Just hope it goes away.
If he doesn't win reelection I'm gonna be lower than skunk shit.
Yes, Will. & unlike the other R's Trump won't try & win the entire black vote,,,just earn (he has) a swath, peel off a swath (your "stay at home") & perhaps glean a small bonus swath.Quote:
Originally Posted by Will Hunting
He'll hammer that stop & frisk thing,,,but, I heard (a momentary aside on a CNN show last week) that Trump supported that stop & frisk in the circa. Do you have confirmation of that, Will? If so, then the old man can't utilize it worth a damn.
ADDENDUM:::& I'm confidant that once Bloom is stationary in the final choosing he'll set up a national clearinghouse with a billion or 3 in escrow to pay out to anybody (on their honor) who was affected by his (((stop & frisk.))) The blacks want a (check)...something tangible to show (us) that he just didn't apologized, but, made monetary amends.
That's coming just as sure as the turnin' of the earth.
Then I fully expect his TDS to get the best of him when the time comes, if it comes.Quote:
Originally Posted by Will Hunting
Whether or not he did support it Trump can still utilize it imo (ie there was the Howard Stern interview where Trump supported the Iraq war but didn’t stop him from using it).Quote:
Originally Posted by Thread
Like we both agreed, he just has to convince black voters both candidates are shitty in order to peel off a swath of them. If Trump attacked Bloomberg for stop and frisk and the best Bloomberg could come up with was “:cry well you supported it too :cry” that’s absolutely a win for Trump and a big fat L for Bloomberg.
The old Willster with good materiel!Quote:
Originally Posted by Will Hunting
CNN isn't a gossip ragQuote:
Originally Posted by Thread
amenQuote:
Originally Posted by spurraider21
you called it ma niga :tuQuote:
Originally Posted by Thread
They play it straight!Quote:
Originally Posted by Blake
:lol Cuck
Chumpettes: :cry She doesn't matter; move on! :cryQuote:
Originally Posted by Thread
Non Faggots: She wants to win at all costs.
:lmao
Dream ticket tbh.Quote:
Originally Posted by Thread
I'm all for it!
What about your girl Amy :lolQuote:
Originally Posted by SnakeBoy
Yeah, sure, they're always citing their "sources" as gospel. Must be nice not to have to prove your work, Blake.Quote:
Originally Posted by Blake
& you're gonna be sittin' there, dick in your hand cryin' your eyes out.Quote:
Originally Posted by SnakeBoy
& the old man on the knoll taking pot shots. "Donald, let's go home, honey." - MelQuote:
Originally Posted by hater
"No."
Life Insurance.Quote:
Originally Posted by Thread
lol, let me guess, that 'news' came from a conservative outlet...
definitely a topic of study, the obsession of trumpistas with clinton, tbh...
Yep, Bloom doesn't want to be President other than to match Trump & simultaneously boot him off the spot.Quote:
Originally Posted by Spurtacular
I don't even think Trump wanted to be President till he got in there & they decided to cheat & steal him out of it. THEN he wanted to be President. THEN you couldn't talk him out of it. It's the effervescent child in him that is prone to eruption at the drop of a straight pin. "Huh, what?"
Yeah, I'm admittedly obsessed with her, El. She remains dangerous, lethal to the old man. Go back thru that Election evening. (We) can laugh about it now, it's okay, but, I've went thru those YouTube videos a few times & it was not a sure thing till the end. 70k votes across the belt is not a rumor, El.Quote:
Originally Posted by ElNono
I want nary part of her. Bundled with Bloom is a living nightmare in my estimation.
tbh, it's not exclusive to you, it has surfaced here over and over during the last 2+ years, which is a strange phenomenon, IMO.Quote:
Originally Posted by Thread
If I had to guess, I actually think it's the other way around, tbh, a known foe you defeated once is a measurable target, it gives you a certain degree of certainty. For example, you already know she's heavily unliked, even from factions within the Dem party.
Anyways, not sold bloomberg is going to win the nomination, but in the event he does, I fully expect him to pick somebody that claims to be trending to the left side (ie: Steyer, even Warren, etc). He's the center-right candidate already, he probably want to pry some votes from the more obstinate BernieBros, etc.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ElNono
Desperate narrative.Quote:
Originally Posted by ElNono
^ exhibit A
^Desperate fingerpointing
Nobody even made a thread on this. Someone just regarded a hot plausible story that's out there; and now you're bent out of shape.