RIP Mini Mike: Audio leaks show Bloombergs racist views

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by hater

RIP this little niga :lmao

:lmao he will keep spending money but the audio wont go away hes done

:lmao demorats now down to 3 Klobitchard, Pocahondas and PeteGuaido :lmao

---

See Chris - this is what I'm talking about. SMH

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spurtacular

^Desperate fingerpointing

Nobody even made a thread on this. Someone just regarded a hot plausible story that's out there; and now you're bent out of shape.

---

Actually, you've been running with the "Clinton is going to run" conspiracy for a long ass time. Be happy to post the actual quotes once search is working again, but both you and I know we had this conversation before.

Not to mention that, yes, it was a conservative outlet advancing this.

IIRC, we even had other posters like Will Hunting or spurraider21 mocking the fact that some of you have a hard on for Shillary running again in any shape or form.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ElNono

Actually, you've been running with the "Clinton is going to run" conspiracy for a long ass time. Be happy to post the actual quotes once search is working again, but both you and I know we had this conversation before.

Not to mention that, yes, it was a conservative outlet advancing this.

---

We've regarded the possibility that has always been there. It's still there, and now you're crying.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ElNono

IIRC, we even had other posters like Will Hunting or spurraider21 mocking the fact that some of you have a hard on for Shillary running again in any shape or form.

---

They cried, too.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spurtacular

We've regarded the possibility that has always been there. It's still there, and now you're crying.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spurtacular

They cried, too.

---

That's exactly what I said. The conservative obsession with Shillary running is a strange phenomenon... Notice how the news almost always come from the conservative side.

Nobody is crying, the fact is that Shillary is not running (not yet anyways), and the only ones asking for her to do so is people like you.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ElNono

That's exactly what I said. The conservative obsession with Shillary running is a strange phenomenon... Notice how the news almost always come from the conservative side.

Nobody is crying, the fact is that Shillary is not running (not yet anyways), and the only ones asking for her to do so is people like you.

---

Cos the Chumpette strategy is to pretend it's not reality until it happens. They like to pretend that everyone else is just crazy; :lol you're no different.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ElNono

IIRC, we even had other posters like Will Hunting or spurraider21 mocking the fact that some of you have a hard on for Shillary running again in any shape or form.

---

:lol all of the cuckservative predictions about her running again have been hilariously qualified/hedged.

”I think she’s going to run again but I wouldn’t be surprised if she doesn’t either!”

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spurtacular

Cos the Chumpette strategy is to pretend it's not reality until it happens. They like to pretend that everyone else is just crazy; :lol you're no different.

---

Pretty sure something not becoming reality until it happens is actually a quintessential part of what makes something reality :lol

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Will Hunting

Pretty sure something not becoming reality until it happens is actually a quintessential part of what makes something reality :lol

---

Pretty sure you're being deliberately obtuse.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spurtacular

Cos the Chumpette strategy is to pretend it's not reality until it happens. They like to pretend that everyone else is just crazy; :lol you're no different.

---

:lol That's literally the exact definition of reality. Something that actually happened. Otherwise it's daydreaming/wishcasting, normally driven by some kind of obsession/conspiracy.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Will Hunting

Pretty sure something not becoming reality until it happens is actually a quintessential part of what makes something reality :lol

---

:lol

:lol Will beat me to it

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spurtacular

Pretty sure you're being deliberately obtuse.

---

I’m being obtuse by saying something that hasn’t happened yet and might very well never happen isn’t part of reality :lmao

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Will Hunting

I’m being obtuse by saying something that hasn’t happened yet and might very well never happen isn’t part of reality :lmao

---

The reality is Hillary desperately wants to run and will explore her options and make whatever moves to that end. If you want to pretend the issue is that I or whomever is saying it's a sure thing, then enjoy.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ElNono

:lol Will beat me to it

---

Don't worry; you're no less desperate for it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spurtacular

The reality is Hillary desperately wants to run and will explore her options and make whatever moves to that end. If you want to pretend the issue is that I or whomever is saying it's a sure thing, then enjoy.

---

So you’re predicting that Hillary might run and she also might not run. Great job, Nostradamus. Really going out on a limb.

Which one has a greater than 50% chance of happening, her running or not running?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Will Hunting

So you’re predicting that Hillary might run and she also might not run. Great job, Nostradamus. Really going out on a limb.

Which one has a greater than 50% chance of happening, her running or not running?

---

Bro, we've hashed this out already. You shouldn't let your desperation get the best of you.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spurtacular

Bro, we've hashed this out already. You shouldn't let your desperation get the best of you.

---

You avoided making any non-hedged predictions then and looks like you’ll continue avoiding making non-hedged predictions now.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spurtacular

They play it straight!

:lol Cuck

---

Derp plays it gay

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spurtacular

Don't worry; you're no less desperate for it.

---

What am I desperate for? Pointing out you're obsessed with Shillary? Is that even debatable? :lol

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spurtacular

Cos the Chumpette strategy is to pretend it's not reality until it happens. They like to pretend that everyone else is just crazy; :lol you're no different.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Will Hunting

Pretty sure something not becoming reality until it happens is actually a quintessential part of what makes something reality :lol

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ElNono

:lol That's literally the exact definition of reality. Something that actually happened. Otherwise it's daydreaming/wishcasting, normally driven by some kind of obsession/conspiracy.

---

:lol derrp

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ElNono

tbh, it's not exclusive to you, it has surfaced here over and over during the last 2+ years, which is a strange phenomenon, IMO.

If I had to guess, I actually think it's the other way around, tbh, a known foe you defeated once is a measurable target, it gives you a certain degree of certainty. For example, you already know she's heavily unliked, even from factions within the Dem party.

Anyways, not sold bloomberg is going to win the nomination, but in the event he does, I fully expect him to pick somebody that claims to be trending to the left side (ie: Steyer, even Warren, etc). He's the center-right candidate already, he probably want to pry some votes from the more obstinate BernieBros, etc.

---

IF she'd a went all in...traveled thru the Belt, not sat down the last week of the race then yes, I'd feel different, confident that she wasn't a further problem. & maybe that's why she held, because even she wasn't sure she had it in her to actually finish it. When you're that close to it, been forsaken time & again the mind plays tricks no matter the human disposition to the stakes on the table. I just think she came up temporally short. She was done & wanted to put the question in the hopper, but, there was still time on the clock & He used it thru the Belt. Her worst nightmare came true.

Now, she can see clearly. NOW. & she hasn't burned thru her physical & mental reserves as she had the last several times. She's fresh & can do the heavy lifting, know precisely how it has to be done, permitting Bloom to stay above the mundane, the drudgery of a Presidential campaign.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Will Hunting

So you’re predicting that Hillary might run and she also might not run. Great job, Nostradamus. Really going out on a limb.

---

:lol

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Will Hunting

You avoided making any non-hedged predictions then and looks like you’ll continue avoiding making non-hedged predictions now.

---

I haven't avoided anything. I've told you her endgame. If she jumps in, it'll be when she thinks has her best chance. Thus far, her attempts to reduce Bernie have played out; but she has to wait and see how the chips fall. Weak as she is, she'll flame out like Biden if she lacks precision.

How's that ankle taste, Blake? :lol

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Thread

Yeah, sure, they're always citing their "sources" as gospel. Must be nice not to have to prove your work, Blake.

---

You're calling CNN out for not putting out a story about Clinton/Bloomberg that hasn't been proven yet.

pick a lane, boomer

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Thread

IF she'd a went all in...traveled thru the Belt, not sat down the last week of the race then yes, I'd feel different, confident that she wasn't a further problem. & maybe that's why she held, because even she wasn't sure she had it in her to actually finish it. When you're that close to it, been forsaken time & again the mind plays tricks no matter the human disposition to the stakes on the table. I just think she came up temporally short. She was done & wanted to put the question in the hopper, but, there was still time on the clock & He used it thru the Belt. Her worst nightmare came true.

---

You start off strong enough; but your conclusion is wrong. I guarantee Hillary was thinking 2020 from the moment she lost. She may have had her doubts; but she didn't just stop becoming a single-minded psychopath.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spurtacular

How's that ankle taste, Blake? :lol

---

You don't know what ankle biting means, dipshit. :lol

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Thread

IF she'd a went all in...traveled thru the Belt, not sat down the last week of the race then yes, I'd feel different, confident that she wasn't a further problem. & maybe that's why she held, because even she wasn't sure she had it in her to actually finish it. When you're that close to it, been forsaken time & again the mind plays tricks no matter the human disposition to the stakes on the table. I just think she came up temporally short. She was done & wanted to put the question in the hopper, but, there was still time on the clock & He used it thru the Belt. Her worst nightmare came true.

Now, she can see clearly. NOW. & she hasn't burned thru her physical & mental reserves as she had the last several times. She's fresh & can do the heavy lifting, know precisely how it has to be done, permitting Bloom to stay above the mundane, the drudgery of a Presidential campaign.

---

She's extremely unlikeable, Cul... she easily cost them Florida, at the very least, and she really had trouble getting out the vote where it mattered, a sure sign of a non-inspirational candidate. But you might be right that she might've learned some lessons in retrospect.

IMVHO, the odds of a Trump re-election greatly increase if she's part of any ticket.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spurtacular

I haven't avoided anything. I've told you her endgame. If she jumps in, it'll be when she thinks has her best chance. Thus far, her attempts to reduce Bernie have played out; but she has to wait and see how the chips fall. Weak as she is, she'll flame out like Biden if she lacks precision.

---

So is she going to jump in or not?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ElNono

IMVHO, the odds of a Trump re-election greatly increase if she's part of any ticket.

---

She would ensure that that "history" voters don't walk away from the white male billionaire vs. white billionaire male melee.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by LkrFan

See Chris - this is what I'm talking about. SMH

---

Democrats started the KKK, are you really surprised when you hear about these old timers being racist fucks and wearing black face etc...?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Blake

You're calling CNN out for not putting out a story about Clinton/Bloomberg that hasn't been proven yet.

pick a lane, boomer

---

I ain't calling CNN out for that, Blake. You misunderstood my point...I'm saying since they got scooped they were reticent to echo the story. That's all I'm saying.
---------
My point about CNN sourcing is separate, Blake.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spurtacular

She would ensure that that "history" voters don't walk away from the white male billionaire vs. white billionaire male melee.

---

BTW, you clearly know this, ElNono; that willfully ignorant thing is all. :lol

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Chris

Democrats started the KKK, are you really surprised when you hear about these old timers being racist fucks and wearing black face etc...?

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Thread

I ain't calling CNN out for that, Blake. You misunderstood my point...I'm saying since they got scooped they were reticent to echo the story. That's all I'm saying.
---------
My point about CNN sourcing is separate, Blake.

---

Oh so you it's just your own narrative that you can't prove.

Got it

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spurtacular

You start off strong enough; but your conclusion is wrong. I guarantee Hillary was thinking 2020 from the moment she lost. She may have had her doubts; but she didn't just stop becoming a single-minded psychopath.

---

Yep. She didn't shit the bed, take a fit & lose her mind. Obama told her to call the old man & soldier & soldier-she-did. Would He have shit the bed, took a fit and lost his mind?

Mel woulda told him to call Her. "Shut up---make me turkey pot pie." & that call would still not been made.

Me, Spurts? I wish she'd just go away & leave me alone.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Blake

Oh so you it's just your own narrative that you can't prove.

Got it

---

They're the ones that can't prove.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ElNono

lol, let me guess, that 'news' came from a conservative outlet...

definitely a topic of study, the obsession of trumpistas with clinton, tbh...

---

Incredible that so many liberals are buying it

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Thread

They're the ones that can't prove.

---

So now you're back to calling them out.

Really, pick a lane already.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Thread

Me, Spurts? I wish she'd just go away & leave me alone.

---

You're the one giving her free rent

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Blake

So now you're back to calling them out.

Really, pick a lane already.

---

You're being obtuse, so, take the victory, Blake. I shoulda known better.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Blake

You're the one giving her free rent

---

Yeah, I don't hide my renters.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Thread

You're being obtuse, so, take the victory, Blake. I shoulda known better.

---

No, you just want it both ways.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spurtacular

I haven't avoided anything. I've told you her endgame. If she jumps in, it'll be when she thinks has her best chance. Thus far, her attempts to reduce Bernie have played out; but she has to wait and see how the chips fall. Weak as she is, she'll flame out like Biden if she lacks precision.

---

You’ve told me her endgame is either running or not running.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Will Hunting

You’ve told me her endgame is either running or not running.

---

:lmao

It's February 2020, you fucking idiots. If you still think Hillary is considering a run for President, you're delusional.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Will Hunting

You’ve told me her endgame is either running or not running.

---

Her endgame is to run if and when she thinks she has a considerable chance. There is no guarantee that such a chance will come to fruition.

Desperately needing a pigeonhole like Chump isn't going to get you the W you want.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spurminator

It's February 2020, you fucking idiots. If you still think Hillary is considering a run for President, you're delusional.

---

That window is closing fast. Too bad we're really talking about the under card at the moment; going through the backdoor. Try to keep up, Lambert; stop lashing out.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spurtacular

Her endgame is to run if and when she thinks she has a chance. There is no guarantee that a chance will come to fruition.

---

So either running or not running.

You could say that about literally millions of people. If I thought I had a good chance at getting elected, I’d enter the primary as a candidate. The premise that “person X will enter the race if person X thinks he/she has a chance” isn’t unique to Hillary.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Will Hunting

So either running or not running.

You could say that about literally millions of people. If I thought I had a good chance at getting elected, I’d enter the primary as a candidate. The premise that “person X will enter the race if person X thinks he/she has a chance” isn’t unique to Hillary.

---

YOU'RE BEING PURPOSELY OBTUSE

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spurtacular

That window is closing fast. Too bad we're really talking about the under card at the moment; going through the backdoor. Try to keep up, Lambert; stop lashing out.

---

The window closed in 2016 when she was one of the least popular Democratic candidates in history and lost in an upset to one of the least popular Republican candidates in history. It only lives on in the fantasies of politically illiterate dupes like yourself.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Will Hunting

So either running or not running.

You could say that about literally millions of people. If I thought I had a good chance at getting elected, I’d enter the primary as a candidate. The premise that “person X will enter the race if person X thinks he/she has a chance” isn’t unique to Hillary.

---

Still being obtuse. Come on, man. You're better than this. Do you need a W that badly? It's not like people are sh**ing on you like Chump and some of his closer allies.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Blake

YOU'RE BEING PURPOSELY OBTUSE

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spurtacular

Still being obtuse. .

---

Easy call

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spurminator

The window closed in 2016 when she was one of the least popular Democratic candidates in history and lost in an upset to one of the least popular Republican candidates in history. It only lives on in the fantasies of politically illiterate dupes like yourself.

---

Yea, you Chumpettes love to cry about how unpopuplar she is while also crying about how popular she is (see popular vote). Stop lashing out, Lambert.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Blake

Easy call

---

:lmao

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spurtacular

Yea, you Chumpettes love to cry about how unpopuplar she is while also crying about how popular she is (see popular vote). Stop lashing out, Lambert.

---

Not sure if I’m a Chumpette or if this is also directed at me but I’ve never once cried about how popular she is...a fucking retarded golden retriever could have won the popular vote in 2016 running as the Democrat against Trump. My opinion all along has consistently been she’s an unpopular hag who most people are sick of hearing from.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Will Hunting

Not sure if I’m a Chumpette or if this is also directed at me but I’ve never once cried about how popular she is...a fucking retarded golden retriever could have won the popular vote in 2016 running as the Democrat against Trump. My opinion all along has consistently been she’s an unpopular hag who most people are sick of hearing from.

---

Loosely, maybe. Certainly not full fledged or dyed in the wool. But you're clearly having a tough day. So readily accepting props from Blake should be your first clue of that, tbh. :lol

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spurtacular

Yea, you Chumpettes love to cry about how unpopuplar she is while also crying about how popular she is (see popular vote). Stop lashing out, Lambert.

---

She did win the majority of national votes, which we call the "popular vote." The popular vote is not subjective. Saying she won it is stating a fact, not crying.

That doesn't mean she was "popular" as measured by her approval and popularity ratings, which were historically bad.

Are you following this yet? Or are you going to continue to stubbornly contradict easy concepts just to have some human interaction on a Saturday as usual?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spurtacular

Still being obtuse. Come on, man. You're better than this. Do you need a W that badly? It's not like people are sh**ing on you like Chump and some of his closer allies.

---

Let’s say you had a considerable chance at winning the primary, would you run? I certainly would.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spurminator

She did win the majority of national votes, which we call the "popular vote." The popular vote is not subjective. Saying she won it is stating a fact, not crying.

That doesn't mean she was "popular" as measured by her approval and popularity ratings, which were historically bad.

Are you following this yet? Or are you going to continue to stubbornly contradict easy concepts just to have some human interaction on a Saturday as usual?

---

Well, clearly she's popular if she's winning the "popular vote".

:lmao This isn't hard stuff, Lambert.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Will Hunting

Let’s say you had a considerable chance at winning the primary, would you run? I certainly would.

---

Sure. But are her chances that considerable as long as Commie Cuck is riding high? She knows that's not a favorable contrast for her.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spurminator

Are you following this yet? Or are you going to continue to stubbornly contradict easy concepts just to have some human interaction on a Saturday as usual?

---

Derp seems to be having an extra rough Saturday today.

But I'm guessing Valentine's day can be rough for even the most die hard of incels

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spurtacular

Well, clearly she's popular if she's winning the "popular vote".

:lmao This isn't hard stuff, Lambert.

---

So now derp is saying she's actually popular.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Blake

So now derp is saying she's actually popular.

---

Blake gonna keep biting ankles while running from the blake and reck thread. :lmao

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spurtacular

Blake gonna keep biting ankles while running from the blake and reck thread. :lmao

---

I'm directly referencing your post, simple derp. I don't give a shit about your cry-about-Blake meltdown thread.

You must REALLY be having a rough day if you bumped it. :lol

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Blake

So now derp is saying she's actually popular.

---

When all you do on 60+ degree Saturday afternoons is sit behind a computer picking dumb arguments you're bound to contradict yourself from time to time.

Have a great Saturday, derp!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spurtacular

Sure. But are her chances that considerable as long as Commie Cuck is riding high? She knows that's not a favorable contrast for her.

---

This is where we agree. If Bernie and Biden weren’t in the race and it was a bunch of no names, I think she’d definitely be in it. Since they are in the race though and there’s no way they’re both bowing out prior to Super Tuesday, I’m not sure what we’re talking about.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Blake

I'm directly referencing your post, simple derp. I don't give a shit about your cry-about-Blake meltdown thread.

You must REALLY be having a rough day if you bumped it. :lol

---

It's not a safe space for you. You need to bite ankles for your "friends" is all. :lmao

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spurminator

When all you do on 60+ degree Saturday afternoons is sit behind a computer picking dumb arguments you're bound to contradict yourself from time to time.

Have a great Saturday, derp!

---

Hey asshole fuck you it’s in the 30s where I am :lol

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Will Hunting

This is where we agree. If Bernie and Biden weren’t in the race and it was a bunch of no names, I think she’d definitely be in it. Since they are in the race though and there’s no way they’re both bowing out prior to Super Tuesday, I’m not sure what we’re talking about.

---

What I'm talking about is she's leaving that window as open as possible at all times. She'll come in after Super Tuesday if she wants and thinks she can win a brokered convention. But again, as long as the contrast is her vs. a strong Bernie before then, then she's gonna keep her distance.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spurtacular

What I'm talking about is she's leaving that window as open as possible at all times. She'll come in after Super Tuesday if she wants and thinks she can win a brokered convention. But again, as long as the contrast is her vs. a strong Bernie before then, then she's gonna keep her distance.

---

:lol the Hedge

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spurtacular

What I'm talking about is she's leaving that window as open as possible at all times. She'll come in after Super Tuesday if she wants and thinks she can win a brokered convention. But again, as long as the contrast is her vs. a strong Bernie before then, then she's gonna keep her distance.

---

Yeah that’s where I think you’re dreaming. There’s no scenario where she’d come in after Super Tuesday. If there were a brokered convention where Hillary won after not even being in the race prior to Super Tuesday it’d be the biggest political clusterfuck in modern American history and the Democratic Party would kill itself with infighting. There’s not a chance she views that as a real opportunity.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Will Hunting

Yeah that’s where I think you’re dreaming. There’s no scenario where she’d come in after Super Tuesday. If there were a brokered convention where Hillary won after not even being in the race prior to Super Tuesday it’d be the biggest political clusterfuck in modern American history and the Democratic Party would kill itself with infighting. There’s not a chance she views that as a real opportunity.

---

That's cute. You think the Dems are that tethered to some sort of a moral code.

:wow

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spurtacular

That's cute. You think the Dems are that tethered to some sort of a moral code.

---

Where did he mention a "moral code"?

:lol

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spurtacular

That's cute. You think the Dems are that tethered to some sort of a moral code.

---

Definitely not, I think they’re teathered to maintaining a more modest level of corruption that flies under the radar. A brokered convention awarded to Hillary would be a much more flagrant and overt act of corruption that potentially leads to the complete downfall of the DNC.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Nathan89

:wow

---

Disgusting.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Will Hunting

Definitely not, I think they’re teathered to maintaining a more modest level of corruption that flies under the radar. A brokered convention awarded to Hillary would be a much more flagrant and overt act of corruption that potentially leads to the complete downfall of the DNC.

---

They don't have to sell sh** to anyone other than influencers with political capital. The narrative that none of the other losers are up to par would be an easy sell.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Will Hunting

Disgusting.

---

That's the state of the Dems. Come to terms.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spurtacular

Her endgame is to run if and when she thinks she has a considerable chance. There is no guarantee that such a chance will come to fruition.

Desperately needing a pigeonhole like Chump isn't going to get you the W you want.

---

And clearly, the longer you wait into the voting process, the better. :tu

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Reck

And clearly, the longer you wait into the voting process, the better. :tu

---

In this case, yes. At the moment, Bernie would throttle her. You gonna keep lashing out now that you've been told, tranny?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Will Hunting

Yeah that’s where I think you’re dreaming. There’s no scenario where she’d come in after Super Tuesday. If there were a brokered convention where Hillary won after not even being in the race prior to Super Tuesday it’d be the biggest political clusterfuck in modern American history and the Democratic Party would kill itself with infighting. There’s not a chance she views that as a real opportunity.

---

Either way, the convention will be a clusterfuck. I dont think Bernie nor candidate B will get the necessary delegates to pass the threshold needed. This is where Bernie might get screwed over.

As much as I dont like the GOP their side makes more sense. It should be winner take all. It is ridiculous that for the past two primaries, the top two basically go home with the same amount of delegates. How are you supposed to distinguish yourself? You're not gonna win by 60% every time so yeah this second and third place also get a participation trophy is a bit ridiculous to me.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Reck

As much as I dont like the GOP their side makes more sense. It should be winner take all. It is ridiculous that for the past two primaries, the top two basically go home with the same amount of delegates. How are you supposed to distinguish yourself? You're not gonna win by 60% every time so yeah this second and third place also get a participation trophy is a bit ridiculous to me.

---

It's that way for a reason. Narrow it and then let the media take it's marching orders from DNC brass / corporate overlords. It would make less sense for the GOP to cheat that way; they have other ways.

Also, :lol at you overcompensating for your closet Republicanism on that lead-up.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Reck

Either way, the convention will be a clusterfuck. I dont think Bernie nor candidate B will get the necessary delegates to pass the threshold needed. This is where Bernie might get screwed over.

As much as I dont like the GOP their side makes more sense. It should be winner take all. It is ridiculous that for the past two primaries, the top two basically go home with the same amount of delegates. How are you supposed to distinguish yourself? You're not gonna win by 60% every time so yeah this second and third place also get a participation trophy is a bit ridiculous to me.

---

If Bernie heads into the convention with the delegate lead and gets fucked by super delegates or a brokered process so someone like Pete Buttplug and his really creepy smile win you can hand Trump 4 more years. The Bernie Bros will revolt in a much bigger way than they did in 2016.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Reck

Either way, the convention will be a clusterfuck. I dont think Bernie nor candidate B will get the necessary delegates to pass the threshold needed. This is where Bernie might get screwed over.

As much as I dont like the GOP their side makes more sense. It should be winner take all. It is ridiculous that for the past two primaries, the top two basically go home with the same amount of delegates. How are you supposed to distinguish yourself? You're not gonna win by 60% every time so yeah this second and third place also get a participation trophy is a bit ridiculous to me.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spurtacular

It's that way for a reason. Narrow it and then let the media take it's marching orders from DNC brass / corporate overlords. It would make less sense for the GOP to cheat that way; they have other ways.

Also, :lol at you overcompensating for your closet Republicanism on that lead-up.

---

Recky & Spurts with the respective goods of a Saturday evening comin' down.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Will Hunting

If Bernie heads into the convention with the delegate lead and gets fucked by super delegates or a brokered process so someone like Pete Buttplug and his really creepy smile win you can hand Trump 4 more years. The Bernie Bros will revolt in a much bigger way than they did in 2016.

---

Hence why the urgency to eliminate Bernie sooner rather than later.

Ironically though, Dems are collapsing under the weight of what's always sustained them: the voter under 45. :lol

:lol

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ElNono

lol, let me guess, that 'news' came from a conservative outlet...

---

Drudge

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ball Buster

---

Maher has a strange shtick. He tells liberals they're too crazy in one segment, the next he's saying it doesn't matter because Trump is a dictator who will cancel the election results (and not joking).

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Chris

:lol

---

lol can't wait for the outrage when Trump retweets it

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SnakeBoy

Maher has a strange shtick. He tells liberals they're too crazy in one segment, the next he's saying it doesn't matter because Trump is a dictator who will cancel the election results (and not joking).

---

Maher is a moron. I'll still never forget one of his segments about how you can be a high functioning meth user like it was just weed or coke.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SnakeBoy

Maher has a strange shtick. He tells liberals they're too crazy in one segment, the next he's saying it doesn't matter because Trump is a dictator who will cancel the election results (and not joking).

---

Maher is a faggot.

He likes to play to both sides of the same isle. He invites moderate dems and he placates them. Then he invites super proggresives and pretend he likes Bernie.

Fuck that guy.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Reck

Maher is a faggot.

He likes to play to both sides of the same isle. He invites moderate dems and he placates them. Then he invites super proggresives and pretend he likes Bernie.

Fuck that guy.

---

Let it out, tranny; what did the big bad meanie say that you didn't like?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SnakeBoy

Maher has a strange shtick. He tells liberals they're too crazy in one segment, the next he's saying it doesn't matter because Trump is a dictator who will cancel the election results (and not joking).

---

Since the 2016 election he’s gone balls deep for the establishment & moderate Dems. He used to be a fervent supporter of Medicare for all and now he hates it, and he’s got this really gay shtick about how Democrats :cry shouldn’t criticize each other :cry

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spurtacular

Let it out, tranny; what did the big bad meanie say that you didn't like?

---

At least 3 posters provided the answers why, derp. Keep up cuck lover.