1. https://tallahasseereports.com/2020/...fake/#comments
2. Fatalities counted differently ChumpDumper. I already told you
Printable View
1. https://tallahasseereports.com/2020/...fake/#comments
2. Fatalities counted differently ChumpDumper. I already told you
florida data not released due to icu being set-up for all covid patients no matter severity and for isolated nosocomial reasons. Then these were coded, based on govt regulations as icu covid cases.
Now hospitals are being forced to use legit numbers by DeSantis. Fake news getting squashed
I already conceded to Darrin she's not credible.
You don't appear to understand the graph I linked. Those aren't Covid deaths. They are ALL CAUSE deaths, so you "can't count fatalities" differently in that case. Sweden saw more all cause deaths in that window than their neighbors, so something was killing them at a higher rate. Hmmm? Wonder that was?
Boiled down, lockdowns work, Covid is deadlier that the flu, wear a fuckin mask.
In my view, the true herd immunity threshold probably lies somewhere between the 7% and 24% implied by the cases illustrated in Figures 4 and 5. If it were around 17%, which evidence from Stockholm County suggests the resulting fatalities from infections prior to the HIT being reached should be a very low proportion of the population. The Stockholm infection fatality rate appears to be approximately 0.4%,[20] considerably lower than per the Verity et al.[21] estimates used in Ferguson20, with a fatality rate of under 0.1% from infections until the HIT was reached. The fatality rate to reach the HIT in less densely populated areas should be lower, because R0 is positively related to population density.[22] Accordingly, total fatalities should be well under 0.1% of the population by the time herd immunity is achieved. Although there would be subsequent further fatalities, as the epidemic shrinks it should be increasingly practicable to hasten its end by using testing and contact tracing to prevent infections spreading, and thus substantially reduce the number of further fatalities below those projected by the SEIR model in a totally unmitigated scenario.
th:lolldren still afraid to post any links to his gossip
Sweden
Lack of lockdown increased COVID-19 deaths in Sweden
Sweden's controversial decision not to lock down during COVID-19 produced more deaths and greater healthcare demand than seen in countries with earlier, more stringent interventions
Sweden's unusual approach also saw fewer patients admitted to intensive-care units than expected. But the country has seen a higher percentage of deaths in older patients outside ICUs than other countries when ICU beds were not limited. That suggests health authorities there have considered patients' chances of recovery in deciding who receives access to intensive care,
"Higher levels of individual action would further suppress the infection,
while a complete lack of individual action would likely have led to runaway infection," :lol USA USA USA
https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_relea...-lol070320.php
From the same study...
Sweden is perhaps the most prominent example of mitigation -- limiting the extent of socially and economically disruptive interventions while still aiming to slow spread and allow for an effective medical response," the researchers wrote in a new paper outlining their findings. "Studying the effects of this strategy, which elements are key to reducing mortality and healthcare need, and how it might compare to other approaches, is thus of critical importance to the global understanding of pandemic responses."
We're lucky Sweden fucked up so bad. We can study them to see what to avoid.