I already tore that shit apart a few days agoQuote:
Originally Posted by tholdren
https://i.imgur.com/v7nYUmI.png
Printable View
I already tore that shit apart a few days agoQuote:
Originally Posted by tholdren
https://i.imgur.com/v7nYUmI.png
^correction though. Covid IFR is for 50-64 is actually .0014, about 3 times higher than the flu for that age group.
Bwajahhahahahahahahahabahahahavahavahahag wrongQuote:
Originally Posted by midnightpulp
So completely wrong.
Bwahhahahahahahahah
Literally the director of the cdc said the burden of flu was 13 times greater than school age. Bwahahahhahahahahahaha
Fail
Quote:
Originally Posted by midnightpulp
Bwahhajahahajahahahhahahahahahshsh
Failed again.
Where's yours?Quote:
Originally Posted by tholdren
Show your math.
Let's further dump on tholdren's claim that the flu is less lethal for 18-64 age group than Covid. I already did this a week ago, but have to do it again because he keeps Goebbels'ing the lie over and over.
In 2018, one of the worst flu seasons on record, the 18-64 age group saw 9500 deaths
Per holdren's own fuckin' link, by June 17, Covid has already claimed roughly over 19000 in that age group. And the count is still going UP.
https://www.acsh.org/sites/default/f...20by%20age.png
Quick scatterplots
Per the director of the cdc
WE HAVE UNDER THE AGE OF 18 RIGHT NOW, SIX MONTHS INTO THIS PANDEMIC, WE ARE LOOKING AT THE MORTALITY FOR THOSE UNDER 18 ABOUT .1 FOR 100,000 AND ONE IN HA MILLION. AND I ALWAYS TRY TO COMPARE THAT TO INFLUENZA WHERE THE MORTALITY OVER THE SAME PERIOD OF TIME IN THE LAST FIVE YEARS HAVE RANGED ANYWHERE FROM FIVE TIMES TO 16 TIMES HIGHER THAN WHAT WE CURRENTLY HAVE FROM COVID
bwahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahaQuote:
Originally Posted by midnightpulp
Thats not ifr. Lololololooll
You have no idea what you are posting
Bwahahahhahahahahagagag
Are you talking about school age children under-17 or so? I don't disagree with that. The stats even show it. Your dumb claim is that the flu is more lethal for people in the 18-64 age group. That stats DO NOT show that.Quote:
Originally Posted by tholdren
BwahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahaQuote:
Originally Posted by midnightpulp
Can't even read statistics beahahahahhahahahahahahajhahahahahahahabah
Quick post then backpedal and namecall
Bwahahahhahahahahahahbababababababbababahahahahhah ahababababhahahahahabahhahahahahah
The stats do show that. Bwahahahhahahahahahahahhahaha
Are you this retarded? If there's been more than twice as many deaths in that group already, the IFR is already higher, since we're yet nowhere near the average number of flu infections we get each year (around 60 million). Current estimate is about 37 million.Quote:
Originally Posted by tholdren
Also, your dumb link extrapolates the IFR from cases in Geneva, Switzerland, not the US. Two different populations in terms of average health (one very fat, the other not very fat).
lololollolooooolllooololoolol using Swiss data to theorize about US IFR lolololoohahahahahahbahahaahahahaahaaQuote:
Another group, which examined deaths in Geneva, Switzerland, concluded that the overall IFR is 0.38% to 0.98% (with a point estimate of 0.64%.)
no idea what ur posting lolooolojjjjjkekekekekekeek
BwahahhahahahahahQuote:
Originally Posted by midnightpulp
You dont know what ifr means.
Bwahahahhahahahahahahahahah
You didn't read
Bwahahhahahahahahahahah
You are completely wrong
Nwjahahhahajajajjajajajajajjajajajajajajajajjajaja ja
Midnightpulp doesn't understand how math works.
Or ifr
Or research
BwahahahahahahahhahahahH
bwahahaahhahahahahahhahaQuote:
Originally Posted by midnightpulp
Cannot use statistics
Lololol
I'll take that as your concession.Quote:
Originally Posted by tholdren
And lmaoooooooololololokekekejjajajaajajaja SWISS DATA loloooooooooooooooololoooooooooooooooooooool
Tore it apart lololol with your scatterplot. LolokIkokolokl then you say what data can and can't be inclided, yet you can't define your own terms used.Quote:
Originally Posted by midnightpulp
Bwahahhahahahahajnajahahja
Doesn't understand generalization or distribution
Bwhahahahahahhahahahahahahhahahaha
Worse than RandomGuy
you dont even uderstand how your data you use is collected.Quote:
Originally Posted by midnightpulp
Wahahahahhahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahhahahahah ahahahahah
Then you say correlation
Bwahahahhahahahahahahahhahahahahhahahahahha
LololololQuote:
Originally Posted by tholdren
Midnightpulp
0 math classes taken
I'm actually using the Swiss states to compare theorized IFRs of the flu and Covid. Since the Swiss are healthier than US citizens, I expect our IFR to be higher than theirs. Let's boil this down: For the 18-64 age group in total, Covid is more lethal. Simple as that.Quote:
Originally Posted by tholdren
Now wear a mask and urge Abbott to shutdown. Texas is getting out of hand.
A cherry picked paper lolommmloololmaolmaokekekekekekekekejajajajajaajaj aajajaQuote:
Originally Posted by tholdren
Bwahabahhahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahhahahahahaha haQuote:
Originally Posted by midnightpulp
Quick tell me how cases are counted.
Midnightpulp is the guy who will tell you that unreliable data is good when he uses it to make a point.
And then scrutinizes data.
Midnightpulp has a bias issue.
Thread
Case are counted by confirmed covid deaths, either through test or doctor's diagnosis.Quote:
Originally Posted by tholdren
Now wear your mask
BWAHAHAHAHAHA :lolldren pwned again. How many lessons do you need to be taught, old man? :lmao
LololIlokl this is completely wrong.Quote:
Originally Posted by midnightpulp
And he tweets that hospitals will be overwhelmed
Loloololl
Its RandomGuy
Bwahahhahagahahahahahhahahahahahahahah
Lol lockdowns don't work.
Use distribution.