Why is it funny that I don't want to use your hyperbolic terminology?Quote:
Originally Posted by DMX7
Printable View
Why is it funny that I don't want to use your hyperbolic terminology?Quote:
Originally Posted by DMX7
in the context of this discussion, absolutelyQuote:
Originally Posted by Spurtacular
:lol "context"Quote:
Originally Posted by spurraider21
They confronted him. Chase is misleading at best.
derp folds on a legitimate question and cries "ankle biting".Quote:
Originally Posted by Spurtacular
No way!
why did they need a truck derp? they tried to follow him and decided to cut him off. thats a chaseQuote:
Originally Posted by Spurtacular
I've explained the matter multiple times.Quote:
Originally Posted by Blake
Amateur Chump impressions won't get you w's, board cuckold.
Lol derp's definitionsQuote:
Originally Posted by Spurtacular
:lol Means of transportation is a chase. :lolQuote:
Originally Posted by spurraider21
There's no point is discussing anything with a retarded, racist piece of lying shit. That's you, derp.Quote:
Originally Posted by Spurtacular
Just cos we call him Lite doesn't mean you're in his league.Quote:
Originally Posted by Blake
Sit back and let your better-than's talk.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DMX7
That's the police report, dumbfuck.Quote:
Originally Posted by Spurtacular
Cuckstruating won't get you w's either.Quote:
Originally Posted by Blake
You're an idiot. That's it, that's all.Quote:
Originally Posted by Spurtacular
First of all, they absolutely chased him. And second, I'm laughing that you would even try to draw a distinction without a difference that's compounded with an incorrect premise.Quote:
Originally Posted by Spurtacular
The chase (i.e. "pursuit"), begins at 3:21 in the video timeline of events below.
Interesting. The second neighbor joined in on the pursuit. Must be full-on KKK, amirite?Quote:
Originally Posted by DMX7
DON'T CALL IT A CHASE THOQuote:
Originally Posted by Spurtacular
If that video is correct, I'm relatively okay with calling it a chase. Though the one guy holding the handgun was on the phone with police and attempting to involve them ASAP. Not exactly the stuff murder is made of. Chumpettes just love a good white lynching.
YOU ARE SO DESPERATE TO BE ON CHUMP'S LEVEL. :lolQuote:
Originally Posted by Blake
disgustingQuote:
Originally Posted by DMX7
Why would they call the police if they were trying to get away with murder?Quote:
Originally Posted by spurraider21
That's pretty stupid on its face.
I'm guessing the conservatives/GOP are hoping for a guilty and long term sentence here (2nd degree murder and ~25-30 years for the dad; perhaps manslaughter for the son and ~5 years) so the left will stop crying double standards.
This is why Dems love these cases. These shameless narratives fire their base. A not guilty verdict is really good for business.Quote:
Originally Posted by Millennial_Messiah
If you don’t know this person then please stop pretending to care.
You are so stupid. Did you know that in a lynching it’s the person who gets lynched that dies and the person who does the lynching that survives? Not the other way around.Quote:
Originally Posted by Spurtacular
I doubt they originally intended to kill Arbery when the call was made, but they thought they had the right to chase him down the street with a gun even though they are not police and they had no evidence that he had done anything seriously wrong. That was problem number 1. And I wonder why they felt that way. Hmmm....Quote:
Originally Posted by Spurtacular
Problem number 2 of course is the fatal consequence of what can happen when you introduce the above risks, which is why they had no business going after Arbery to begin with.
Do you know what a metaphor is?Quote:
Originally Posted by DMX7