Nothing to do with the 36 tax hikes, huh?Quote:
Originally Posted by Will Hunting
Convenient.
Printable View
Nothing to do with the 36 tax hikes, huh?Quote:
Originally Posted by Will Hunting
Convenient.
Nope, nothing to do with that. History has proven that hiking taxes on your oligarch overlords strengthens the economy. That's why Clinton did it in 1993 and Obama let tax cuts expire in 2013.Quote:
Originally Posted by Spurtacular
Biggest economic expansion and prosperity in this country was post-WWII, with taxes way up there, and a debt/GDP ratio north of 50%...
Please, let the derp dig some more, no more facts.Quote:
Originally Posted by Will Hunting
I have family in hysterics with derp digging.
Great entertainment during the “plandemic.”
Shhh... I mean, we're on the gravy train now, don't wake people up...Quote:
Originally Posted by Will Hunting
History proves it as long as we're willing to overlook that little great depression in 37 and 38 and who knows what else. :lolQuote:
Originally Posted by Will Hunting
You clearly don't, otherwise you'd be using them as examples.Quote:
Originally Posted by Spurtacular
FIFYQuote:
Originally Posted by ElNono
:lmao As if ignoring a depression is not enough?Quote:
Originally Posted by Will Hunting
You ignored the numbers you posted yourself.Quote:
Originally Posted by Spurtacular
Self-goal and who knows what.Quote:
Originally Posted by Spurtacular
JinxQuote:
Originally Posted by ChumpDumper
I didn't ignore it. I already gave an explanation.Quote:
Originally Posted by Spurtacular
I've provided a lot more than 1 example of economic prosperity immediately following tax increases and economic calamity following tax cuts.
The highest tax rate pre-depression was 25% in 1929. Why did the economy crash if tax rates were so low? Also, why did GDP go up from 1934-1937 even though top tax rate went up to 63%? Wouldn't an increase from 25% to 63% crater the economy?
Do you want me to make another chart to explain it better? I’m always willing to help the less intelligent.
How could it be in spite? According to conservative dogma taxes are an integral part of the economy. Either job killing or job creators.Quote:
Originally Posted by Spurtacular
I also forgot to mention strong unions during that period.
Goggle more derp
Tells us how the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor and how we did not quit.
(Note: This is in reference to movie “Animal House” should you google it and want to prove a point to save your dignity as an educated person.)
Will he fold or say “nyet” like trump and ask for Russian assistance or who knows what else?
That's liberal dogma, son. You're getting confused.Quote:
Originally Posted by ElNono
And like that, the goal posts change. Magic.Quote:
Originally Posted by Spurtacular
No dogma here son:Quote:
Originally Posted by Spurtacular
https://i.ibb.co/PG13jx2/Median-Income-5.png
Quote:
Originally Posted by Will Hunting
I thought the two multi-trillion dollar wars were responsible for the Dubya's weak numbers. I wish you guys would make up your minds. :lol
Where did I say anything about the Iraq War in this thread? Pretty sure I said all along that tax cuts and deregulation were the cause of his weak numbers.Quote:
Originally Posted by Spurtacular
:lmao You're so low in the pecking order.Quote:
Originally Posted by ChumpDumper
:lmao NPC fuming.
Oh, so you think those numbers wouldn't have been no better without the wars, let alone 911?Quote:
Originally Posted by Will Hunting
derp: But, but, but the liberals, the liberals are bad, bad.Quote:
Originally Posted by Will Hunting
No, I don’t. I think the wars were stupid for a number of other reasons, but I don’t understand whatever you’re trying to argue here.Quote:
Originally Posted by Spurtacular