Printable View
and practicing terrorists and leaders of terrorist countries that endorse terrorism, endorse John Kerry.
An unprecedented show of support for an American presidential candidate.
Allahwipeasswithhandi, former chief beheader for Ansar al-Islam had this to say about John Kerry: If he wins, we win. America needs to do the right thing.
Nice. :lol
"Recruitment for suicide bombings and the terror war has never been better under Bush" said Al-Zawari before planting another road-side bomb which any runny-nose private can disarm but the whole U.S. military can't seem to do. "Before Bush it was hard to find support for islamic causes in a secular state, but since the illegal invasion and occupation of Iraq, recruitment numbers are at record levels. So much so that my small group of insurgents is now being regarded as insignificant by much larger and more radical groups. This must stop."
Poll after Poll, with the same results...
100% of America's enemies would vote for John Forbes Kerry.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marcus Bryant
Thanks MB, it's good to see you and I have finally found something we can agree on after the past few years...John Kerry - The Great Uniter.
Poll after poll confirms that attacking a secular country and turning it into a Islamitic bastion is bad policy.
No, I believe the polls still show most Americans believed Saddam Hussein needed his ass whooped.Quote:
Originally Posted by Nbadan
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yonivore
:lol :lol :lol
To which America, replied: That's funny, they didn't seem to have any problems finding people willing to commit suicide, murder athletes, behead their enemies, and target civillians, prior to the War on Terror either...Must have been Clinton's habit of shooting random cruise missles into countries every time he got caught getting blown in the Oval office.Quote:
Originally Posted by Nbadan
America went on to say: Nothing a few well placed nukes and a few hundred million civillian casualties, followed by some excessive, brutal and atrocious war crimes, won't fix, if push comes to shove. We'll feel guilty for a while, but we'll get over it eventually. Like, the next time we see a replay of September 11th.
So does George Bush, and I'm sure 75% of the families of GI's who have perised in Iraq would be more than happy to accommodate.
Oh yeah, beheading and suicide bombings were out of control in the U.S. before W invaded Iraq, but now, now they occur in a much more reasonable number.Quote:
To which America, replied: That's funny, they didn't seem to have any problems finding people willing to commit suicide, murder athletes, behead their enemies, and target civillians, prior to the War on Terror either...Must have been Clinton's habit of shooting random cruise missles into countries every time he got caught getting blown in the Oval office.
I think you'd be surprised at how many families of KIA's actually support the war effort, are proud of their lost loved one, and believe in the cause for which they died.Quote:
Originally Posted by Nbadan
I don't know the percentage but, I'd wager it's closer to be the exact opposite of the number you pulled out of your ass.
Quote:
America went on to say: Nothing a few well placed nukes and a few hundred million civillian casualties, followed by some excessive, brutal and atrocious war crimes, won't fix, if push comes to shove. We'll feel guilty for a while, but we'll get over it eventually. Like, the next time we see a replay of September 11th.
Why am I not surprised? Another war-mongerer with no sense of reality.
Actually, I know of no terrorist perpetrated beheadings in the U.S., either before or after the beginning of the war on terror. I am, however, aware of a certain 3,000 fatality suicide bombing that occurred, prior to the war, on September 11, 2001.Quote:
Originally Posted by Nbadan
Obversely, I'm not aware of any suicide bombings in the U.S. after we started pounding the shit out of Islamo-extremists in their own backyard.
Just wait till the U.S. has to pull out of Iraq and the nation turns into one big Al-Queda recruitment ground, and then we'll ask the families about the sacrafice of their loved ones.Quote:
I think you'd be surprised at how many families of KIA's actually support the war effort, are proud of their lost loved one, and believe in the cause for which they died.
Yeah, and none of the 911 perpatrators were from Iraq. Using your logic, maybe France should be next on W's wish list instead of Iran and North Korea?Quote:
Actually, I know of no terrorist perpetrated beheadings in the U.S., either before or after the beginning of the war on terror. I am, however, aware of a certain 3,000 fatality suicide bombing that occurred, prior to the war, on September 11, 2001.
Dan, if you think it's easy for them to recruit now, just imagine how easy it'll be for them if they actually win, which Kerry will allow them to do...he sure as hell helped the Viet Namese, they were counting on Americans like him to make us lose our will...just like the terrorists are now. Just ask any Viet Namese immigrant(they are easy to tell...they are the ones who had their land taken from them and most of their family murdered after we pulled out of Viet Nam and it became an unlivable shithole).
I will say that their constant airing of the beheadings of bound men makes it much easier to recruit me to the idea of nuking their entire culture off the face of the planet.
They can recruit all they want...in the end they will lose because they are backwards ass movement based on opression, ignorance and lies...and we can be some homicidal mofo's ourselves when so inclined...they blew up the wrong motherfucking country's buildings. I predict people will really be feeling sorry for these beheading scum by the time we are done with them.
What the hell are you smoking? Abu Gharib was the poster-child for Al-Queda recruiting. Al-Queda and Osama Bin Laden are still planning and plotting attacks against the West and the U.S. has zero troops to do anything about it thanks to the Iraq cluster-fuck.Quote:
Dan, if you think it's easy for them to recruit now, just imagine how easy it'll be for them if they actually win, which Kerry will allow them to do...he sure as hell helped the Viet Namese, they were counting on Americans like him to make us lose our will...just like the terrorists are now.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nbadan
If you get that part of it...why would you elect Kerry? That's exactly what will happen to Iraq if he is elected. He's the one that going to pull out of Iraq and fuck all the Iraqis there who do support us...which is most of them.
I know it's most of them support us because we are fighting terrorist who hide amongst women and children...not a force of 20 million people, who if so inclined, could obliterate the small force we have there and could drive us out on the ground in a matter of moments.
The U.S. has lost the moral-authority to rebuild Iraq. The sooner you realize this the better for all of us. It is your kind of thinking why the U.S. had to lose 50,000 troops in Vietman before the U.S. pulled out, and what was gonna happened there inevitably happened anyway.Quote:
If you get that part of it...why would you elect Kerry? That's exactly what will happen to Iraq if he is elected. He's the one that going to pull out of Iraq and fuck all the Iraqis there who do support us...which is most of them.
I know it's most of them support us because we are fighting terrorist who hide amongst women and children...not a force of 20 million people, who if so inclined, could obliterate the small force we have there and could drive us out on the ground in a matter of moments.
No, it was antiwar sentiment back home that caused us to lose that war. It was also antiwar sentiment that lead to slow methodical approach in which their civillians were valued more than the lives of men that were defending this country, costing us tons of lives. You idea that it was what was going to happen there anyway is fatalistic.Quote:
Originally Posted by Nbadan
It didin't happen anywhere else we stayed and killed all the bad guys.
You assume everyone there is against us...and that just simply isn't true.
Much like our anti-war protesters here give the appearance of the entire country being violently opposed to the war, and again, that just isn't true...the protesting voice is often the smallest in number, that is why it screams the loudest.
And everytime you or the press make this huge ordeal about civillians dying, you cost American troops their lives. But that's ok, without that voice in our country we would be truly fascist and brutal. I respect that voice, but it has no business leading the country at this time. Right now, we need an asshole running the country.
If I have to watch our guys dying in the process of fighting for this country and liberating their countr,y so they can turn on us in 50 years like Europe has.... you can damn sure bet I am willing to watch some of their civillians die in the process...and you cannot tell me that any of our real wars have been unjust and that the country hasn't been better, both in terms of humanitarian rights and quality of life, for us winning.
And you are right I am a war monger....being unjustly declared war upon has that effect on me. You could say I've been radicalized.
Keep telling yourself that Abu Gareib and Bush were the cause of Radical Islam....
If anything caused it it was the UN, Britain and France forming Israel, while having probmised all that land to the Arabs. This problem existed prior to 2001...and the terrorists have no right to dicate which countries we support..if they are going to declare war on us...the countries that protect them will either cooperate with us...or they are going to feel the efffects of this war as well.
Exactly. Funny how the Islamic terrorists had no recruiting problems throughout the 1990s. Remember Somalia? The US turned tail and ran once the battle began. Bin Laden has been reported again and again as being emboldened by that response.Quote:
Dan, if you think it's easy for them to recruit now, just imagine how easy it'll be for them if they actually win,
Either we get serious about dealing with the Islamic fascists or else we are sucking terrorist cock in the back of our Land Rovers, no matter how many "No War for Oil" or "No One Died When Clinton Lied" bumper stickers we have plastered on the back.
Figure it out.
:rolleyesQuote:
No, it was antiwar sentiment back home that caused us to lose that war. It was also antiwar sentiment that lead to slow methodical approach in which their civillians were valued more than the lives of men that were defending this country, costing us tons of lives. You idea that it was what was going to happen there anyway is fatalistic.
Yeah, Killing millions of North Vietnamese and South Vietnamese in the process of liberating them had nothing to do with us losing that war. It didn't matter how many troops we sent to die in Vietnam because China was sending 10x the number we were sending. Up to the very end the U.S. kept up the facade that there was a chance to negotiate a peace to the war. So we sent in more and more of our brave soldiers to die needlessly.
Everytime we kill civilians the snowball effect takes hold in Iraq and we inflame even more moderate Muslims. This is what contributes to more road-side bombs and suicide bombings, and more coalition troops dieing.Quote:
And everytime you or the press make this huge ordeal about civillians dying, you cost American troops their lives.