Adelman, game 2 - It was illegal (pick)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by v2000

so what if it was out? you still cant set picks with your leg. he also gave Bibby a bit of a push. and Bibby tried to spin around him, so im not sure where you guys think he just ran into Duncan. look again, but before doing so, get that homeristic point of view out of your head.

---

You might look again, too, but get the hate out of your head first?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by picnroll

No jackoff Mavs fan should ever complain about picks since moving screens are what the entire Mav's offense and Dirk are built around.

---

Yup, Dampier in particular seems to hold on EVERY screen.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CubanMustGo

A man after my own heart. :lol

Hey, Cubes prolly DOES "run" the Mavs from a Starbucks. He basically only responds to interview questions via e-mail anyway.

---

i have seen cubes in no less than 2 PTI interviews in thelast month

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jmard5

That late screen by Duncan that caught and buckled Mike Bibby while Barry dropped in the crushing three? Still bugs Adelman.

"I wasn't going to say anything (initially), but it was illegal," Adelman said. "That's supposed to be illegal. But we can say it's our fault. We should not have been in the position to get picked. That was our big mistake."

---

This really didn't surprise anyone, did it? After all, Sacramento is in the heart of whine country. Cheese anyone?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by 101A

You don't consider P. Jackson a great coach?

---

Phil is all about head games, it's a little bit different. I think Adelman went back and called the pick illegal because he was catching so much heat from the media about his defensive set and leaving Barry wide open in the corner.

The pick was illegal, but it wasn't called. As were many calls for both teams. I can't believe there are three pages of this thread on such a meaningless topic.

i didn't even notice the pick, my attention was on menu. didn't look any different than any other pick i see from any other big man.

sounds like the second comin of mark cuban

Quote:

---

The pick was illegal, but it wasn't called

---

Kinda makes up for all those illegal ones Webber, Divac, Pollard and other Kings cronies set every year eh?

A maverick fan scolding Spurs fans, on illegal picks isssssss sooooo pathetically hypocritical, its not even funny.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by T Park

Kinda makes up for all those illegal ones Webber, Divac, Pollard and other Kings cronies set every year eh?

---

What does this have to do with anything?

The game was called horribly both ways. How does this "make up for something"???

:lol

I see Kings fan has lost its sense of humor after two losses.....

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by 101A

He moved, before or after was incidental; he also pushed off before that. It's what great players do; know what they can get away with when.

Bottom line; if it isn't called, it's not a foul.

---

It's the playoffs, "no autopsy, no foul".

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by T Park

:lol

I see Kings fan has lost its sense of humor after two losses.....

---

I've still got my sense of humor, the fact is you are just not funny. :elephant

:yawn.

The fact is the board stinks when the opposing trolls come in.

Except Piston fan, they are the most logical and best to talk to.

LOL.

Am I a troll because I've called you out on your nonsense posts? Please, I'd love for you to explain to me how I'm trolling.

Funny now that you are the one talking about logic when you hardly have a grasp of it yourself.

KingsFanWithoutName

plonk! that didn't take long.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by LEONARD

The Kings got called for 29 fouls and the Spurs got called for 28. Seems pretty even to me?

---

I'm gonna say that 4 of those 29 came in the overtime period when the Kings fouled on purpose.

Adelman was a whiner in Portland. Some things never change.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by exstatic

Some things never change.

---

Like Spurs fans starting threads to bitch about foul calls when it was 28 fouls to 29 fouls?

How many of the Kings fouls were intentional in the OT?


Thank you.

One would think that Rick Adelman would be able to lose a playoff game with some class. After all, he's had so much practice...

I've been reading a lot of team forums in the last couple games. Most fans (not just fans of the Kings) think that it was an illegal pick. Oh well. If he was moving, he wasn't moving enough that they were going to call it in that situation.

The illegal part of the pick wouldn't have made a lick of difference to whether Bibby would have gotten a hand in Barry's face...Bibby was already effectively neutralized when Duncan started to move/stumble, thus it is a good non call.

It was the only flaw in one of the best executed end of game plays I have ever seen.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by T Park

How many of the Kings fouls were intentional in the OT?


Thank you.

---

4. Such a difference.

Ever wonder why you don't here me whining about Bonzi fouling out on some weak touch call?


I can look at this game from an objective viewpoint, seems you have trouble doing the same...........................and your team won. :rolleyes