He still puts him in time out, everyone knows that
Printable View
He still puts him in time out, everyone knows that
:lol
No one ever mentioned the reunion of Webber and Bibby if this deal would have went down.
Probably because the 76ers are trying to trade Webb as well
I'm hearing that Ainge finally cave in and is willing to offer Jefferson so Boston has a deal that Philly will accept. Now, everyone has to send in their offers topping it or Iverson goes to Boston.
Damn, Jefferson is awesome, I would probably take the Warriors deal, but Bostons is pretty great too
Jefferson, West, Telfair and Ratliff for Iverson is the offer, although Boston may swap out West for a #1. Philly won't get much better in combo of last year as well as young players.
Sac definitely out of it
Quote:
NBA's Kings Won't Trade for Allen Iverson, Owner Maloof Says
By Scott Soshnick
Dec. 12 (Bloomberg) -- Remove the Sacramento Kings from the list of possible new teams for Allen Iverson, a former Most Valuable Player who has demanded a trade from the Philadelphia 76ers.
``We're staying away,'' Kings co-owner Joe Maloof said in a telephone interview. ``We're not going forward.''
The Kings were among a handful of teams that publicly disclosed an interest in the National Basketball Association's leading scorer when the 31-year-old guard's trade demand was made public last week.
Maloof didn't say why the Kings had changed their mind.
I wanted to ask about that when everyone was talking about them "reuniting", because I knew they weren't on good terms.Quote:
Originally Posted by spurtime
Anyway, all of your sources sounded legit. Thanks for the info.
Sorry to beat a dead horse...But now I'm hearing that Bibby and his dad's issue had nothing to do with the breakdown in negotiations. Bibby was okay with going, but the Kings just didn't think they were getting enough back, or they thought they were taking on too much in long term money and the injury issue with Baron Davis.
:hungry: Mike Bibby would be a perfect fit for the Spurs :hungry:
Bibby plays no defense whatsoever, his shooting has been steadily declining over the last four years, and considering the offenses he's played in, has assist numbers only slightly better than Parker's.
Other than that, he's great.
Playoff Bibby > Playoff Parker
:lol you want to see the stat comparison from last years' series?
Parker 22.2 /4.7A/3.5R 51% 33% 89%
Bibby 16.7/5.2A/3.8R 35% 35% 90%
the grass is not always greener on the other sideQuote:
Originally Posted by cheguevara
It's amazing that two playoff series 4 years ago give him this rep. How about his performance in that Seattle series in 2005? :lolQuote:
Originally Posted by cheguevara
Mike Bibby is nowhere near his best. I'd take Devin Harris, Stackhouse and Croshere (exp contracts) if Dallas would do it. I heard Boston were trying to offer Jefferson, Ratliff, Telfair and West(or a first round pick) (providence journal). That almost sounds too good to be true, and if the Celtics really offered that, the deal should have been done by now.
It sucks to be a Sixer fan cuz the probability of being screwed in a trade is too high. We're trading freaking Allen Iverson. This is a lose-lose situation.
I heard that 6ers wanted Kevin and Maloofs said hell no basically but I've heard so much in the last 3 days, I don't know what to believe anymore.
odds on iverson staying put for this season? :lol
WTF does Baron Davis have to do with a trade between Sacto and Philly?Quote:
Originally Posted by spurtime
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/column...arc&id=2695408Quote:
What they're saying on the Allen Iverson grapevine: The Answer has let it be known that he doesn't want to play in Charlotte.
What they're also saying in front-office circles: Iverson isn't thrilled about the prospect of relocating to Sacramento, either.
What I find myself saying whenever I hear such sentiments: How do players scare teams off so easily when almost no one in the NBA possesses a no-trade clause?
The Bobcats, let's face it, would be skittish about trading for A.I. even if he welcomed the move, given owner Bob Johnson's obvious comfort level with a roster that doesn't pay a single player more than $5.5 million. Although he badly wants to fill up his building and ranks as one of the league's most outspoken owners regarding the struggles of small-market teams, Johnson's hesitancy to sanction an Iverson deal doesn't surprise anyone. You can safely surmise that the little man's knack for selling tickets doesn't stand out to the Bobs as much the $39.8 million left on his contract after this season and Iverson's hard-to-handle history.
But here's the thing.
Iverson doesn't possess the ultimate hammer. NBA front-office sources confirmed Tuesday that his contract does not contain a no-trade clause.
In fact, as far as I know, the Lakers' Kobe Bryant is the only NBA player who has one.
Why?...
Maybe 3 years ago, not today.Quote:
Originally Posted by cheguevara
Remember, Parker was banged up badly in game 6 of the Sacto series and played the Dallas series injured.
People should get off Parker's back. Barring injury, I reckon he'll star in the playoffs this year and finally shut the naysayers up.
Philly and Sac tried to bring Golden State in to facilitate a deal...I mentioned it earlier in the thread.Quote:
Originally Posted by exstatic
iverson rejected a trade that was purposed to him....anyone know about this????