Well, you are talking semantics here....Marbury is a sure fire 9+ assits man every year, and unless I am mistaken, I think that in a nutshell is what you want your PG to do, dish out passes for baskets, yes?Quote:
Originally Posted by timvp
Printable View
Well, you are talking semantics here....Marbury is a sure fire 9+ assits man every year, and unless I am mistaken, I think that in a nutshell is what you want your PG to do, dish out passes for baskets, yes?Quote:
Originally Posted by timvp
And, timvp, you do not agree that the Spurs would be unbeatable with Marbury and Manu in our backcourt every May?
Marbury doesn't create shots. He'll rack up assists because he's playing in a point guard dominated offense.
Pardon the interruption, but....
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimcs50
:lmao :lmao
Marbury makes $15M a year.
So you could trade Parker, Manu and Malik and it wouldn't be enough.
Jim=Ghostwriter? :spin
That's the problem then. You're just babbling about what you don't know anything about. At least come up with something that is possible if you want to trade TP.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimcs50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kori Ellis
Well, so much for this discussion. Fuck the salary cap...damn socialists...whatever happened to free enterprise???
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shelly
Shelly wins!!!!! :elephant :elephant
I was doing this until someone called me Ghost. Since Ghost has been scarce in here, I decided to be devil's advocate for a change to shake it up in here. I am tired of always being called a homer all the time. :lol
Eh, give it a year....Quote:
Marbury makes $15M a year.
So you could trade Parker, Manu and Malik and it wouldn't be enough.
Yeah that was kind of my point. Jim thinks we should trade TP now! This is the worst time to trade him -- at least next year he has value.
Nah, I do not want to trade him. I do not think I could live w/o hearing Parker talking about TD in his own endearing accent, "Team was really helping us tonight, Team this Team that." :spinQuote:
Originally Posted by Kori Ellis
It's early this season to judge Parker. With Manu rising and Barry hitting, TP just needs to coordinate between the team's scorers, and keep his teardrop warm. Starting off 4-1 is pretty good for the Spurs.
Define break out season?
Break out season to me means:
Coming to the realization his role on this team is best served as a pass first point guard; a realization that Duncan and Manu are option one and two; realizing that he should use his court vision and penetration skills to try and setup his teammates and take advantage of a defense when it doesn't collapse on him with a floater. Break out season means understanding 100% where each one of his teammates, even those coming off the bench, like to get the ball at and where on the court they are most effective when they receive the ball. Breakout means taking advantage of his speed to increase fast break opportunities; breakout means being the type of player that makes the other players better; breakout means perfecting the pic n roll with tim. Breakout doesn't mean 17/7; breakout doesn't mean 15/5.
Breakout may mean 7/12, 8/10, 12/9, 6/13.
I say 14/8.5 would be a great season.
let's just wait and see!
Steve Francis winning a game worth something would give him a break out year.
Spurs are 4 and 1. Yeah, lets trade people.
STFU.
Quote:
Originally Posted by T Park
TPark, allstars do not need a breakout year...they obviously already had it. What a total idiot. :rolleyes
Quote:
Originally Posted by SequSpur
Sequ, they are 5-1....pay attention!!!!
:lol