Who Agrees With the Suspensions?

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

05-15-2007
Scumbag

Re: *Who Agrees With the Suspensions?*

Quote:

Originally Posted by Louie Vega

Like Suns fans wouldn't be happy if Tim and Tony got suspended mother fucker? The only reason i'm happy is cause after all those tapes the Suns sent the league it is two of their best players getting suspended!
So stop being a little bitch cause deep down you're happy too.......COWARD!!!!! By the way any Spurs fan who gets on a computer and calls people names is a COWARD and a PUNK!!!!!!!!!!!!

Lol, you and Martigan must go to the same highschool.
05-15-2007
majinkoola

Re: *Who Agrees With the Suspensions?*

Quote:

Originally Posted by Obstructed_View

Okay, to all the losers, perhaps. Particularly the ones with no class. The majority of no-class losers appears to be the Suns fans.

No-class, huh? Wouldn't that describe fans of a player who cheap shots an opposing player who has shown nothing but class?
05-15-2007
Extra Stout

Re: *Who Agrees With the Suspensions?*

Quote:

Originally Posted by Louie Vega

Sounds to me like deep down you are really a Suns fan!

No, but it's clear that some Spurs fans will rationalize just about anything.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Louie Vega

I think you are tying a little too hard to be clever there Sparky! And chances are I carry more money around then some old lady would keep in her purse! ASS!!!!

How? Do you sell drugs?
05-15-2007
YoMamaIsCallin

Re: *Who Agrees With the Suspensions?*

I think that if Amare and Diaw had never left the bench, Horry would not have been suspended. It's a transparent make-up call. Horry's hit was justifiably punished as a Flagrant 2.

I think they tried, hard, to justify suspending Duncan, as part of the make-up call, but they just couldn't do it. So they made Horry's suspension 2 games.
05-15-2007
Obstructed_View

Re: *Who Agrees With the Suspensions?*

Quote:

Originally Posted by majinkoola

No-class, huh? Wouldn't that describe fans of a player who cheap shots an opposing player who has shown nothing but class?

Yes, actually. Google "I will not be mishandled".
05-15-2007
Extra Stout

Re: *Who Agrees With the Suspensions?*

Quote:

Originally Posted by YoMamaIsCallin

I think that if Amare and Diaw had never left the bench, Horry would not have been suspended. It's a transparent make-up call. Horry's hit was justifiably punished as a Flagrant 2.

I think they tried, hard, to justify suspending Duncan, as part of the make-up call, but they just couldn't do it. So they made Horry's suspension 2 games.

1 game for the foul on Nash.

1 game for the forearm on Bell.

If they were looking for a make-up call, Horry would have gotten 3 or more games.
05-15-2007
Louie Vega

Re: *Who Agrees With the Suspensions?*

Quote:

Originally Posted by Extra Stout

How? Do you sell drugs?

No. But I am pretty well connected. Haven't had your fix today? The only reason I ask is cause you are so quick to bring that subject up! Closet Crack fiend!
05-15-2007
Extra Stout

Re: *Who Agrees With the Suspensions?*

Quote:

Originally Posted by Louie Vega

No. But I am pretty well connected.

I figured as much.
05-15-2007
Strike

Re: *Who Agrees With the Suspensions?*

Quote:

Originally Posted by Extra Stout

Championships are supposed to be won by playing the game, not by baiting the other team out of the series with cheap shots.

Professional basketball, like any professional sport is a competition. You look for any advantage you can find. Whether it's physical prowess, superior skill or even mind games.

IF Horry's intention was to start an altercation and get a few Suns suspended, then it was a mind game that worked to perfection.

Don't blame Robert Horry for Amare and Diaw's stupidity.
05-15-2007
Extra Stout

Re: *Who Agrees With the Suspensions?*

Quote:

Originally Posted by Strike

Professional basketball, like any professional sport is a competition. You look for any advantage you can find. Whether it's physical prowess, superior skill or even mind games.

By that line of argument, I guess we should applaud Mark McGwire and Barry Bonds. After all, they were just looking for any advantage they could find.
05-15-2007
kyle macy

Re: *Who Agrees With the Suspensions?*

I do agree with the suspensions, I don't like it, but rules are rules. Truthfully, it really sucks ass that two guys are too stupid to keep their ass on the bench. I couldn't care less about Diaw, he's been too busy planning Parker's bachelor party since last off season to even give a damn about playing basketball, but the loss of Amare hurts. He hasn't played smart the whole series. As far as the flopping, both teams flop, the refs have lost control of the series, they have let too much crap go for too long on both sides.
05-15-2007
Strike

Re: *Who Agrees With the Suspensions?*

Quote:

Originally Posted by Extra Stout

By that line of argument, I guess we should applaud Mark McGwire and Barry Bonds. After all, they were just looking for any advantage they could find.

Actually, when McGwire was juicing, there was no rule against it. And, while I do believe Bonds is or was juicing, there is no actual proof that he is.

Also, I wasn't talking about shooting yourself up with human growth hormone. Maybe Horry did it with the intention of getting in the Suns players' heads, maybe not. The only person who really knows the truth is Robert Horry himself. Either way, the blame is on Amare and Diaw for leaving the bench. If they had stayed put, the only argument would be whether Horry was punished too harshly which, in my opinion, he wasn't.
05-15-2007
dnull888

Re: *Who Agrees With the Suspensions?*

They're great. Next time we floor Nash, maybe the Suns will lose even more guys.
05-15-2007
Extra Stout

Re: *Who Agrees With the Suspensions?*

Quote:

Originally Posted by Strike

Actually, when McGwire was juicing, there was no rule against it. And, while I do believe Bonds is or was juicing, there is no actual proof that he is.

Nevertheless, the consensus is that their accomplishments are tainted.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Strike

Also, I wasn't talking about shooting yourself up with human growth hormone. Maybe Horry did it with the intention of getting in the Suns players' heads, maybe not. The only person who really knows the truth is Robert Horry himself. Either way, the blame is on Amare and Diaw for leaving the bench. If they had stayed put, the only argument would be whether Horry was punished too harshly which, in my opinion, he wasn't.

I think Horry was frustrated that Nash had just led the Suns to stealing a win in San Antonio.
05-15-2007
Obstructed_View

Re: *Who Agrees With the Suspensions?*

Quote:

Originally Posted by kyle macy

I do agree with the suspensions, I don't like it, but rules are rules. Truthfully, it really sucks ass that two guys are too stupid to keep their ass on the bench. I couldn't care less about Diaw, he's been too busy planning Parker's bachelor party since last off season to even give a damn about playing basketball, but the loss of Amare hurts. He hasn't played smart the whole series. As far as the flopping, both teams flop, the refs have lost control of the series, they have let too much crap go for too long on both sides.

I hereby vow to stop intentionally using terms like "All you Suns fans" from now on.
05-15-2007
Obstructed_View

Re: *Who Agrees With the Suspensions?*

Quote:

Originally Posted by Extra Stout

I think Horry was frustrated that Nash had just led the Suns to stealing a win in San Antonio.

Still seems to me like all he did was seal the victory. Anyone know what the score was when he did that? I think the Spurs weren't down more than two or three.
05-15-2007
Extra Stout

Re: *Who Agrees With the Suspensions?*

Quote:

Originally Posted by Obstructed_View

Still seems to me like all he did was seal the victory. Anyone know what the score was when he did that? I think the Spurs weren't down more than two or three.

It was 100-97 Suns with 18 seconds left.
05-15-2007
Mixability

Re: *Who Agrees With the Suspensions?*

They could've done the Spurs a favor and not handed us the series, but I guess all the fairweather fans that didn't have faith in our team got what they wanted.
05-16-2007
SA210

Re: *Who Agrees With the Suspensions?*

I don't agree with the Horry suspension. Hard foul to Nash and Raja went after him. I'd throw that elbow at someone coming after me too. The rules say Diaw and Amare are out one game, I agree, but Raja should have gotten some kind of fine at least or one game suspension.
05-16-2007
donc2000

Re: *Who Agrees With the Suspensions?*

amare and diaw should not have been suspended .... horry got the right amount - 2 games ... one for the forearm / hip check and one for the forearm thrown at bell ..... this ruling rewards the team that committed the foul ..... you get 30 points sitting out for the suns vs. 7 for spurs ......unfair to say the least ... how would the spurs bench react if tony parker was thrown into the boards by a SUNS sub..... fair is fair .... if amare and diaw are to suspended (rule is rule argument) the horry should have gotten 3 games .....sucks ... such a great series reduced to this controversy ..... horry tainted -"cheap shot rob" ....
pop is off of this one too - calling Horry foul not too bad - please dont complain when pistons do the same to parker / ginobli .... you cant have it both ways .... sorry guys .. bad taste in mouth .....
05-16-2007
Obstructed_View

Re: *Who Agrees With the Suspensions?*

Look up Derek Anderson and Juwan Howard.

I swear, most of you Suns fans are complete pussies.
05-16-2007
easjer

Re: *Who Agrees With the Suspensions?*

Quote:

Originally Posted by donc2000

amare and diaw should not have been suspended .... horry got the right amount - 2 games ... one for the forearm / hip check and one for the forearm thrown at bell ..... this ruling rewards the team that committed the foul ..... you get 30 points sitting out for the suns vs. 7 for spurs ......unfair to say the least ... how would the spurs bench react if tony parker was thrown into the boards by a SUNS sub..... fair is fair .... if amare and diaw are to suspended (rule is rule argument) the horry should have gotten 3 games .....sucks ... such a great series reduced to this controversy ..... horry tainted -"cheap shot rob" ....
pop is off of this one too - calling Horry foul not too bad - please dont complain when pistons do the same to parker / ginobli .... you cant have it both ways .... sorry guys .. bad taste in mouth .....

Too . . . many . . . ellipses. . .
05-16-2007
Obstructed_View

Re: *Who Agrees With the Suspensions?*

Quote:

Originally Posted by Extra Stout

It was 100-97 Suns with 18 seconds left.

Seems like an extraordinarily bad time to intentionally give the top free throw shooter in the league two shots and the ball.
05-16-2007
easjer

Re: *Who Agrees With the Suspensions?*

Please.

All things considered, Horry's foul wasn't that bad. Cheap shot and unwarranted, yes. Dirty and devastating, hardly. It was a solid bodycheck. That's all. Nash wasn't even stunned by it.

Doesn't excuse Horry, but let's put it in perspective.
05-16-2007
majinkoola

Re: *Who Agrees With the Suspensions?*

Quote:

Originally Posted by Obstructed_View

Look up Derek Anderson and Juwan Howard.

I swear, most of you Suns fans are complete pussies.

Wow, calling people "pussies" over the internet. A true sign of toughness.

Most Suns fans aren't mad at San Antonio for Amare and Diaw getting suspended. That's on Stern and Stu.

But how can you be happy with Amare and Diaw being suspended for this? Wouldn't you rather beat the Suns at full strength?

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

*Who Agrees With the Suspensions?*

Who Agrees With the Suspensions?