*Who Agrees With the Suspensions?*

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by lefty

^
Moron

---

Lighten the fuck up.

This was a part of the reason the "Stay On The Bench" Rule was enacted
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/m...83/ai_13611966

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TheSanityAnnex

Do you agree with the suspension?

---

I REALLY wish they would have gone ahead and let that cocksucker play. Now we have to hear about this crap until next season.

Here is the way i look at it. Is it fair that Stat and Diaw get suspended for coming off the bench but not doing anything? No. Did Horry deserve a 2 game suspension for what he did? No

But the league had to give Diaw and Stat 1 game according to the rules so that means that to punish Horry and the Spurs they had to give him 1 extra game.

So i think it was the right decision. Consider the option:

Don't suspend Diaw and Stat and give Horry 1 game. Guess what happens then?

Spurs get blown out in game 5 and are down 3-2.

At least now the Spurs will probably go up 3-2 and get a chance to win the series on their own court minus Horry.

Trust me, it could have been a whole lot worse Spurs fans!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by 41times

Here is the way i look at it. Is it fair that Stat and Diaw get suspended for coming off the bench but not doing anything? No. Did Horry deserve a 2 game suspension for what he did? No

But the league had to give Diaw and Stat 1 game according to the rules so that means that to punish Horry and the Spurs they had to give him 1 extra game.

So i think it was the right decision.

---

You should post more.