I'm glad to see that I'm not the only one that says "oh shit Vaughn is coming in" and "Don't even think about shooting Jac......fuck you missed again"
Printable View
I'm glad to see that I'm not the only one that says "oh shit Vaughn is coming in" and "Don't even think about shooting Jac......fuck you missed again"
Priceless, Timvp. Duncan's defense earned him an A- though. Five blocks, and every other player in the game for both teams combined for 4.
Everyone else.... errrgggg. Manu gets an A+ for effort but minus 50 points for those loony plays of his that end up with the other Spurs going, "Yep. That's his imitation of Homer Simpson." I'll still take it though, he made some good good good plays down the stretch as well.
I'd knock everyone else's grade down a half step. I can't bring myself to give out that many "B's" on a game that was so sloppy.
That's what you think, with your puny 3 dimensions. Jacque plays in five... thousand. At once. And in all the other ones, he's lighting it up like candles on Hannukah. Just look at his mighty leaping abilities!!Quote:
Originally Posted by Xolotl
...
The Earth's gravity is very strong here. Jacque must go now.
Yeah...don't let Bonner off light, I know he only played 3 minutes, but in that 3 minutes he had a tremendous positive impact(for the Suns)...
I don't think I've ever seen a player look as bad in his first playoff game as Bonner did...he sucked.
Jacques Vaughn has relased an instructional video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8K2v2XFYg_Q
"Ginobili!"
Quote:
Originally Posted by timvp
Bowen deserves an A, he played so good I'm considering buying his jersey... :clap
Timvp I guess you won't have the time to answer this one but well...
I know you always give your grades / your expectations of the players.
But to be honest expectations can be slightly different from a ST poster to another...
I'd like to know wich grade you'd give to each player concerning your expectations...
Just to quantify the output you're awaiting for each of them.
Messy question maybe but whatever... :p
Congrats to the Spurs team for a game well-played. :clap
Vaughn = Paul Pressy :depressed
again...timvp: A+! :clapQuote:
Originally Posted by timvp
Question: Manu and Oberto played great together. But, who's starter to next game whit Amare? both boys? :wtf
Yeah, I had a Vaughn-ish type cringe when Bonner entered the game. His defense isn't near playoff ready. Maybe some point next year he'll start to understand the defensive concepts better.Quote:
Originally Posted by whottt
Right now, all I gotta say is thank the basketball gods for Oberto. Without Oberto, this team would be dead in the water. Most teams would laugh at the thought of playing Elson or Bonner ... yet that's a reality for San Antonio.
Oh and this wasn't Bonner's first playoff game for those of you scoring at home.
Yeah Oberto has been unreal.
Hopefully he can bring it big one more game, and then get him some rest.
Quote:
Originally Posted by lebomb
Vaughn makes Avery Johnson look like Steve Nash.
If you look at plus/minus per minute, Oberto has been far and away the best Spur in the playoffs.
Here are the plus/minus stats from last night.
Game 5 Plus/Minus
Tony Parker +22
Michael Finley +12
Fabricio Oberto +10
Bruce Bowen +4
Manu Ginobili +2
Matt Bonner +1
Tim Duncan -4
Brent Barry -4
Francisco Elson -11
Jacque Vaughn -17
We should start a SpursTalk donation drive to send Elson and Vaughn to Cancun early. The level of suckage those two guys impose on a game of basketball in six minutes is unreal.
Tony Parker and Michael Finley with the highest plusses?
How can that be!!!
They are the two biggest chokers on the team though....
:lmao:Quote:
Originally Posted by timvp
Oberto's not getting any rest. He'll be counted on again against Utah if the Spurs close out one more.Quote:
Originally Posted by T Park
Quote:
Originally Posted by timvp
Ok well, there went that excuse...Bonner's appearance left me never wanting him to step foot on the court during a playoff game again. I actually felt myself begin to choke just watching him.
And btw, how come you all of a sudden started taking it easy on Elson?
Last night was easily his worst game as a Spur IMO. F easily.
And Barry didn't get to run any plays...
Surely after 3 years you've noticed...
Barry as a spot up shooter = not very good. Lost. Especially when he's getting inconsistent minutes.
Barry acting as the point or as the initiator of the offense = the smartest ball handler on the team, confident, and IMO, the best passer. Found.
Barry sucks coming in cold off the bench...and I kind of have a problem with the way Pop does this to Shooters...it's what fucked Kerr up too. Kerr went from getting big minutes and being counted on by Jordan to not getting off the bench except in desperation....took him 5 years to acclimate to that role.
RE: Oberto
I've been on the Oberto bandwagon from day 1. Longer than about 90% of the Argentines. I was the guy wanting us to sign Oberto over Rasho...I wanted him over Scola(I still think he gives the team what it needs more than Scola will). I'm not saying he's a HOF'er or anything...I just know what we are going to get from most C VS what we pay them.
Oberto is a bargain when you consider the level he is capable of playing at.
I do concede though...he doesn't bring it every game though, and neither does any other C we've had...or Horry...but he brings it in big games.
One other thing on Oberto...I don't think the Spurs brought him over to gauge Scola...I think they brought him over to gauge Javtokas.
Javtokas and Oberto met in the finals of the ULEB Cup and Oberto outplayed him...Javtokas' team won, and Oberto was Spurlike from the FT line, but he got to the line about 15 times against a guy many considered to be one of the best defensive C's in Europe.
you're clearly an idiot. no one says small ball is always a bad idea. against the mavs, it clearly was. against the suns lineup last night, it clearly wasn't. obviously you don't understand basketball.Quote:
Originally Posted by travis2
:lmao
you slay me...
and yes, there are people here who say that small ball is always bad.
Read. Learn.
Retard:Quote:
Originally Posted by travis2
The Spurs didn't play small ball at all last season until the playoffs. It then became the new Spurs style for 100 percent of the last five games of the series against the Mavericks. A series the Spurs lost, by the way because they couldn't stop anyone and scrambled on defense.
This year, they've played the lineup a lot, so the team is prepared when it's used in stretches and short bursts or against a team that has two bigs sitting out. Elson played more minutes last night than Rasho and Nazr did in the last five games of the Mavs series. Finley's plus minus when he's on the floor in small lineups is proof that he's figured out his role on the defensive end of the small lineup.
Dickhead:Quote:
Originally Posted by Obstructed_View
Tell that to the ones who STILL bitch every time small ball is used.
It was the right call then (and I concede the Spurs didn't have as much experience then) and it was the right call last night.
It wasn't the right call then. Those of us that said so at the time were right. The 63 win Spurs lost despite home court advantage because they couldn't play defense, the one thing that's won them three championships, and the small lineup couldn't rebound. This year's version of smallball does both much better because the players have actually got some experience with it.Quote:
Originally Posted by travis2
Some of us bitch when small ball is used in an attempt to outscore the opponent rather than play defense. That's usually when Pop plays the lineup for the last three quarters of a game. He hasn't done that at all during the post season. It's not a coincidence that the Spurs are up 3-2.
If Pop just decides to run the triangle starting tomorrow night the Spurs will lose to the Suns. Will it be a bad idea? Phil Jackson has won everywhere with it.