is the best point guard in the NBA, Period.
If you disagree with me.....
then you're dumb.
You watch to much WNBA.
you're an idiot.
you're stupid.
and you can blow me.
He's the best.
No contest.
Printable View
is the best point guard in the NBA, Period.
If you disagree with me.....
then you're dumb.
You watch to much WNBA.
you're an idiot.
you're stupid.
and you can blow me.
He's the best.
No contest.
I'll go ahead a disagree right away. I won't even mention who the best point guard is in the league because you know who I'm referring to.
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlatMan
not a point guard (if you're referring to who i think you are)
nash > parker
but not by much
he's the best point guard in the finals
Steve Nash is who I'm referring too.Quote:
Originally Posted by gino>yourlife
Well that doesn't say much, seeing as he's the only real PG in the Finals.Quote:
Originally Posted by Magic_Johnson
At least Parker is no longer the second best point guard on his own team.
agreed thenQuote:
Originally Posted by FlatMan
Kill yourself!!Quote:
Originally Posted by SequSpur
Parker the best PG? :lol
He will be a no show for the next 3 games...
He tends to disappear after a good game..
Mark my Words.
lol delusionalQuote:
Originally Posted by Fast Dunk
tony parker just shit on the entire cleveland cavaliers organization for 2 games straight
sarcasmQuote:
Originally Posted by FlatMan
That makes Game 2 kind of hard to explain then, doesn't it?Quote:
Originally Posted by Spazz Punk
:lmao at all the word marking.
Mark my words: you're silly.
Forum etiquette.
Yeah, he followed up his Finals-high scoring game with....Quote:
Originally Posted by exstatic
....another Finals-high scoring game.
:spin
The thing is, they're backing off him, but once the ball moves, if he gets it back and his man is ONE HALF STEP out of position, Tony has a layup. There is just no one to stop him at the rim. Neither Gooden or Varajao, for all their youth and athleticism, are any kind of real shot blocker. Their initial defense on him is good, but as Pop says, the defense isn't over until the rebound is secured.
Great.. the idiots are chiming in.... As the forum turns....
Parker destroyed Nash in that series. Check the bling. Nash ain't shit.
I wouldn't sleep on Nash. I mean he DID win two MVP awards for a reason. All Nash needs is a new coach.Quote:
Originally Posted by SequSpur
Yeah the media kissing his ass is basically why he won the award twice.Quote:
Originally Posted by dknights411
His new coach would probably insist he play defense, though.Quote:
Originally Posted by dknights411
I've been watching the NBA for 25 years, and Nash is, hands down, the worst MVP in that timeframe. He has a decent, unselfish offensive game. That's it. He couldn't guard a fucking crash test dummy.
No doubt about it, Tony is one of the best PGs in the business. I wouldn't say he's the best right now, but he could be someday. He has accomplished much in such a very few years.
Ummm....Quote:
Originally Posted by exstatic
Dirk Nowitzki
Dirk mainly because of his size is a pretty good rebounder. When he is going good he is a great scorer and good rebounder. When he is going bad though like against the Warriors he is basically useless because he can't guard anyone and does not draw double teams.Quote:
Originally Posted by FlatMan
IMHO Nash is worse as an MVP than Dirk. At least AJ is insisting that Dirk play SOME semblance of defense, and as was previously mentioned, he does rebound.Quote:
Originally Posted by FlatMan
He also choked his way to losing to the 8th seedQuote:
Originally Posted by exstatic
okay, you tell me who is better so exstatic can explain why Parker is the best....Quote:
Originally Posted by HJNTX
bring it.... all of you......
no one had the confidence like me... i've been telling you bitches for years...
now you want one the french fry wagon.... sheyitt... :fro
I think he would be better of as a shooting gurad.Quote:
Originally Posted by SequSpur
The beauty of the motion offense is that there are just guards. No shooting guards, no PGs. Everyone touches the ball, and needs to be able to score or create for others.Quote:
Originally Posted by BIG z
Parker is great...
at ONE thing, finishing at the rim in traffic. and any competent coach can take that away from him, even a great defender can take that away from him.
tony doesn't have great court vision, doesn't have a mid-range game (yet), doesn't elevate or create for teammates, isn't the most athletic, doesn't have a great shooting range or ability.
He looks great right now playing against a crappy coach, an injured defender, alongside the greatest PF of all time, on the most disciplined and well coached team in the league. a LOT of PG's would look great in that situation.
my top PG's:
1: Nash (don't hate Nash because of the shitty phoenix fans, he IS the best)
2: Billups (Detroit is nothing without that guy)
3: AI (finishes like parker, but can shoot, dish, and carry a team)
4: Deron Williams (mark my words, these Jazz will only continue to improve, led by that guy, they could easily be the class of the NBA next year.
5: Kidd (the media always says he's great, and the spurs went after him, so I'll put him at #5, but I've never been impressed by him all that much)
6: Arenas (don't even try and tell me he wouldn't flourish in our system, he would be so much more dangerous on those picks with Duncan, cause he's actually a threat to hit threes, or pass to the open cutter/roller)
7: TP: (and this might even be a reach, Hinrich and Paul are right on his heals.
look, I love Parker, but Duncan will make any PG look good, and even with Duncan, Parker doesn't always look that good. the other PG's on that list put up better stats, while being their teams #1 option or main playmaker, with no Duncan to make their life easy.
But no team as figured out how to deny him access to the rim in two seasons. competent coach and great defender are probably dying species.Quote:
Originally Posted by vand3537
And is improving in all these areas.Quote:
tony doesn't have great court vision, doesn't have a mid-range game (yet), doesn't elevate or create for teammates, isn't the most athletic, doesn't have a great shooting range or ability.
He played against AI, Nash, Deron Williams and looked great. You can't blame him for playing against an injured PG in the finals. You could also say Duncan is not playing great PF/C and Gino is not playing against a great SG.Quote:
He looks great right now playing against a crappy coach, an injured defender
Beno prove this everytime he is on the floor.Quote:
, alongside the greatest PF of all time, on the most disciplined and well coached team in the league. a LOT of PG's would look great in that situation.
I don't disagree on your ranking. Mine :Quote:
my top PG's:
1: Nash (don't hate Nash because of the shitty phoenix fans, he IS the best)
2: Billups (Detroit is nothing without that guy)
3: AI (finishes like parker, but can shoot, dish, and carry a team)
4: Deron Williams (mark my words, these Jazz will only continue to improve, led by that guy, they could easily be the class of the NBA next year.
5: Kidd (the media always says he's great, and the spurs went after him, so I'll put him at #5, but I've never been impressed by him all that much)
6: Arenas (don't even try and tell me he wouldn't flourish in our system, he would be so much more dangerous on those picks with Duncan, cause he's actually a threat to hit threes, or pass to the open cutter/roller)
7: TP: (and this might even be a reach, Hinrich and Paul are right on his heals.
1 Nash (poor defense but maybe the greatest playmaker ever)
2 Kidd
3 Davis (when he is healthy)
4-5-6-7 Billup, Arenas, Parker, AI in no particular order.
8-9 Deron Williams/CP (they still need a bit more experience)
- No PG always look goodQuote:
look, I love Parker, but Duncan will make any PG look good, and even with Duncan, Parker doesn't always look that good. the other PG's on that list put up better stats, while being their teams #1 option or main playmaker, with no Duncan to make their life easy.
- Duncan make Parker life easier but it also limit his stats in another team Parker would have more assist, more PPG and probably a smaller FG%. No PG could have 10+ asst/game in the spurs system.
Just one note You say AI can shoot? Arenas can shoot but AI??? obviously he shoot. AI shooting statistics are awfull (for a superstar)!!!
When you look at Parker stats, don't forgot he only plays 32 minutes a game.
If you compare him to billup you can see that (in 36 minutes) TP have the best stats (I am not saying he is better). In 42.5 minutes (Iverson PT) he would have almost the same stats Iverson has (-2PPG, same APG, better FG%).
tony parker is the best nba point guard alive today.can he be the finals mvp instead of duncan?
Amen.Quote:
Originally Posted by SequSpur
Post of the year.
And if you disagree.....
You can blow Sequ twice.
No contest.
1. Nash
2. Tony
3. Deron
4. billups/paul/iverson and co
Kidd=bullshit.
His stat doesn't win games...Why rebounding? score bitch ah...I forgot you can't score .
Davis? ballhog,without his 3 point range he's shit .
Iverson=Tony's bitch.
He played like a bitch against the spurs so he's not the best,plus he isn't a PG,he's better when he plays SG like in Philly time .
Arenas? he's not a PG.
Only thing he can do is shooting the ball 50 times per game.
Billups? the ECF show us that he's a big shit amen.
THe best= Nash.
And I would the future best= TP with CP and DW.
ONe thing is sure : any Tony is the best PG in the nba at this age.
You may have failed to notice, but Tony has had back to back of 27 and 30, so that kind of discounts your "disappear after a good game" theory.Quote:
Originally Posted by Fast Dunk
And no, I don't think Tony is the best PG in the NBA........YET.
He is probably the most unguardable driving in the lane, and putting up points in the paint. He has a pretty competent jumpshot from 15 - 18 feet out now, and he is starting to get those pinpoint passes ala Steve Nash down. Another year, and learning to dish out 10 -15 times per game ala Jason Kidd and Steve Nash, and he may well be the best in the NBA.
Of course, he is going to get some competition from a guy out there in Utah, by the name of Deron Williams. And let's not forget another youngster by the name of Chris Paul.
Nash and Kidd right now are the best, but their time is coming to an end.
But Tony is still going to have to up his game to be considered the best of the best.
You drink too much alcohol.
Probably the best French person ever since Joan of Arc.
You forgot ZidaneQuote:
Originally Posted by mattyc
you forget jacques chirac :drunk :drunk :drunkQuote:
Originally Posted by mattyc
Whoever thinks Chauncey Billups is better than Tony Parker, much less the second best point guard in the league, hasn't watched the NBA since 2004. Parker isn't the best point guard in the league, but he's now better than Billups.
And if Duncan could make any point guard look great, explain why every backup point guard the last five years has looked like crap outside of Speedy Claxton for one and a half games.
Parker > Baron Pierre de Coubertin
Kirk Heinrich? You've got to be shitting me.Quote:
Originally Posted by vand3537
I love Nash,and his passing and long range shootings skills.But At the same time I have to say the Parker is on his way to become the best Point guard in the league.And when that happens He´ll be greater tham Nash.Why?Simple:He is able to run a team which can play run and guns type of basketball and also Slow tempo Eurolike Type of team like the spurs are right now.The spurs can run,and they can also slow the tempo and kill you with the pick and roll.
Parker is gonna be the best point guard in the league thanks to Greg Popovic.
I am interested in the answer too.Quote:
Originally Posted by timvp
no way dude... the Baron is the father of modern sportQuote:
Originally Posted by mattyc
And Tony Parker is averaging 28.5pts this series.Quote:
Originally Posted by romain.star
Tony wins.
most likely coze when The Buckup PG is on the floor,Timmy is sitting on the bench getting some rest.Quote:
Originally Posted by mathbzh
And that´s why Pop brings Manu as a 6th man instead of starting him,that way He can kind of run the team when TD and TP are getting some rest.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mattyc
:worthy:
Thanks... I am relieved. For one second I believed our backup PG were the only one on earth not looking good when playing with Duncan.Quote:
Originally Posted by ArgSpursFan
Even Beno can't be that bad.
This thread is tops. I have an exam tomorrow and i'm comparing TP to long passed french people....
Quote:
Originally Posted by mattyc
my exam was yesterday so i'm ready to compare tony to every frenchies, from Napoléon to Boris Diaw...
Christian Dior vs Tony Parker
Louis Vuitton vs Tony Parker
Astérix and Obelix vs Tony Parker
André the Giant vs Tony Parker
Who the hell is André the GiantQuote:
Originally Posted by mattyc
Here in France he is a total unknown (I needed to check on google)
actually, Asterix and Obelix are "gaullois", which means they were supposed to live before France even existed...
as for andré the giant, never heard of him...
I am sure Manu Ginobili is the best PG in the league right now, he is the best at everything according to his church.
Wrong he is only second behind LebronQuote:
Originally Posted by ambchang
improved a lot in playoffs, however, didn't shine in difficult moments yet, mostly in easy victories.Quote:
Originally Posted by SequSpur
BTW, you can say he's the best SCORING guard, cause when he shines, is when he scores a lot, he never shines by having a huge game regarding direction.
Complete and utter Bullshit. In case you haven't noticed, Parker has perfected his jumpshot. When he is on, he is unguardable.Quote:
Originally Posted by vand3537
Disproven as above. And his passing has improved as well.Quote:
Originally Posted by vand3537
He's looked great the entire playoffs! Every night he consistently score 20 points or more.Quote:
Originally Posted by vand3537
He hung with Steve Nash, the "best" PG in the game (although how many Finals as Steve Nash been in? How many rings has he won? Funny how someone can be so good, and not have the hardware).
I'll say tied with Parker. Rings count for something, right?Quote:
Originally Posted by vand3537
Is this for MVP of a team or for best point guard period?Quote:
Originally Posted by vand3537
Because Tony > Billups.
Yeah, that worked out for the Nuggets didn't it?Quote:
Originally Posted by vand3537
I love AI, but at this point in his career, Tony is better than AI now.
Deron is better than Tony how? Agreed that this guy will become a great point guard, but he's not at Tony's level yet.Quote:
Originally Posted by vand3537
This proves you're full of shit. How can the best player in the Finals be the number 7 PG on your list?Quote:
Originally Posted by vand3537
I know Cavs suck, but shouldn't Tim be getting 30+ points a game if it's so easy?
No, you don't. If you "loved" Tony, you'd rank him higher than 7. :rolleyesQuote:
Originally Posted by vand3537
Right, because our backup PGs look so good.Quote:
Originally Posted by vand3537
I'm not going to pull the stats of all those players, but please show me Parkers playoff numbers versus any of those guys, and we'll see who wins.Quote:
Originally Posted by vand3537
Parker has been superb. He is the MVP of the first two games.
Nah . . . that is only for the blind members of his Church.Quote:
Originally Posted by ambchang
I think it was about time this forum dedicated a thread to Parker. He has been the best spur in the finals
Parker for MVP!
church of Tony >>> Church of Manu
and I am a proud member of the 2nd
Tony has been stellar with his offense, but let's not forget about how good his defense has been throughout these playoffs.
Now look at that list of PGs and think defense...
P.S. Isn't Andre the Giant Canadian?
Don't forget Thierry Henry !
André the Giant is definitely not French (he is a wrestler right ? we do not have those in France)
André the [dead] Giant, nee André René Roussimoff, was born to French parents of Bulgarian and Polish descent in a small farm near Ussy-sur-Marne. (Wiki).Quote:
Originally Posted by Slomo
Tony is playing well enough to be MVP of the series if he continues at that level, but he's a combo guard and not a true PG. And that's OK as long as you have a PF like Duncan who can get 8 assists in a Finals game. Tony's play fits the Spurs' system now that Pop has quit trying to make a traditional PG out of him.
Laetitia Casta vs. Tony Parker.Quote:
Originally Posted by mattyc
Sorry, Tony . . .
I just voted for him as ESPN's King of the Night on Sports Center. Its not to surprising that the only states that have heavily voted for him are Texas, Oklahoma, and New Mexico.
Interesting that Mark Stein, even with Tony's very good play, thinks Duncan is the MVP at this point:
http://insider.espn.go.com/espn/blog...ame=stein_marc
I keep hearing it after just two games of these NBA Finals: Tony Parker for Finals MVP.
Sacre bleu.
Let's forget, for a moment, that (a) it might be a bit premature to be talking about this kind of stuff and (b) that real Frenchmen would never express astonishment so geekily.
Let's go ahead and skip ahead -- on the assumption that the Spurs will be finishing Cleveland off in five games (or less) -- and focus purely on the fact that Parker simply can't be favored to snag this hardware.
Over Tim Duncan?
Barring an unfathonable drop-off from No. 21 in whatever is left of this season, Duncan is still the most deserving Spur.
That's no slight to Parker, who truly was the most dynamic player in San Antonio's first two victories, using his speed, guile and peerless knack for getting into the paint -- as well as his sharpened jumper -- to ring up 27 points in Game 1 and another 30 in Game 2. Can't say it any better than my man Mike Wise wrote it in Monday's Washington Post: "Two games down, LeBron has been outplayed by Le Blur."
However …
Even though league officials reminded me Monday that this award is based purely on the Finals and not meant to go to the MVP of the entire playoffs by taking earlier rounds into account -- yes, I double-checked for confirmation -- I'd still go with Duncan.
I suspect Parker couldn't do what he does offensively if Cleveland's big men could leave Duncan the way San Antonio's big men give help on LeBron James.
Nor could Parker be an rim-attacking game breaker if the Spurs weren't controlling the tempo, which also flows from Duncan's mere presence.
In 2005, when Duncan beat out Manu Ginobili for Finals MVP by one vote -- sparking a fury in Argentina that still persists to this day among my colleagues in the prensa down there -- there was a genuine debate in play because of Duncan's struggles in that series. The Pistons were at the height of their powers and guarded Duncan as well as anyone has in a playoff series.
In this series, Parker is bound to be the flashiest Spur because Cleveland hasn't found anyone who can guard him … and I doubt starting Daniel Gibson over Larry Hughes on Parker would make much difference.
Either way, Duncan remains the most dominant player of this postseason. It's no different in the Finals than it was in each of the previous three rounds. The Spurs are winning battles all over the floor against the overmatched East champs, but their success still starts with Duncan just about anywhere you want to look.
If you don't believe me, listen to Spurs coach Gregg Popovich.
"[Duncan] does whatever he does offensively pretty naturally," Pop says. "But on defense, this was probably his best year defensively in three, four, five years. Not just blocking shots and rebounding, but being in position, guarding people one-on-one on the post or out on the floor. He had an excellent year defensively and it's continued in the playoffs and even increased based on blocked shots and that sort of thing."
If you don't believe Pop and me, listen to the Frenchman himself.
"Whatever happens, Timmy's the man," Parker said when someone asked after Sunday night's Game 2 victory if he should be listed now as the Finals MVP favorite.
"Timmy is the star on our team."
I liked that answer as much as anything I've seen in this series from Parker.
He might end up forcing LeBron to revise his rankings -- James said Sunday night that Parker was "probably the second-best point guard we've played in the postseason" behind New Jersey's Jason Kidd -- but Parker knows the deal.
Parker =MVP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fast Dunk
"Mark my Words" ... :lol Oh god, another dire warning. *yawn*
Like the man said, were you even watching G2???
:rolleyes
Parker hasn't reached that pantheon as the best player in the league at his position, but he's within striking distance. He has a pretty tough competition though, with so many young, up & coming talented PG's around the league.
ITs parker time!
Don't forget The Spurs are playing against the Cavs.Parker is a very good point guard but he's not as good as Nash right now.Deron Williams was better than him in the West Finals.Is D-Williams better than Parker? You can't say "Parker is the best point guard of the league" even if he win the MVP.TD plays with SA.That's why TP had 3 rings and maybe the reason why Nash never played the NBA Finals.Do you think that you can make a championship team around Parker?
You can take out Parker of the team and we could play the NBA Finals too.Take out Duncan and tell me what happen
Parker = MVP
Blow me.
if nash played parker defense he would be put parker may not be the best but he's somewhere up there and is still improving nash has hit his highest peak
Parker would drop 40 on nash if he guarded him.. book it.
i hope he doesnt get robbed, like manu got robbed in '05
I would also give MVP to Tony. Unstoppable and out of his mind.
Imagine that. An MVP trophy to go along with all the other marvels in his life. Some people just have it all.
Quote:
Originally Posted by klx23
I hate the media. Whatever the media portrays, millions of people automatically follow it like mindless robots.
Media Guy with no real NBA knowledge: "It seems to me that Tony Parker is making a case for MVP."
PPG enthusiasts fans with no real NBA knowledge: "Yes! TP iz teh gr8tst!"
Poor Tim Duncan. Leads his team to a great season every year and just can't get due respect from anybody.
TP 4 MVP MY ASS!
VIVA LA FUNDEMENTAL GRANDE!
First of all, get off Tim Duncan's jock. I have never seen anyone be so passionate about Tim Duncan winning a trophy he's won several times before.Quote:
Originally Posted by tim_duncan_fan
Secondly, do you have a problem with Tony Parker? I dont hang around these boards a lot because I'm obviously not a Spurs fan, but it seems to me that there are the Duncan fans and the Parker fans (who supposedly say "TP is the gr8test"). What is this?
Lastly, no, not poor Tim Duncan. I don't feel sorry for him at all. Sure he's the best player on the team, but Tony Parker has been pretty amazing in these Finals. Perhaps it's because we have no answer for him, but we really don't have an answer for anyone. This award is for the best player in THIS series. So far, Parker has proved to be slightly more deserving than Duncan.
Stop crying and whining and accept the reality that for once, someone else but your precious Tim Duncan might actually win MVP. Get over it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by klx23
Uhm. Dude. It's a difference of 4 PPG. There's more to the game than scoring and anyway everyone knows that TP wouldn't be able to go off without Tim Duncan drawing so much attention, but of course, in this age of the NBA points is all that matters. Defense and rebounding account for nothing.
Oh god yet another Spurs fan that did not watch the 05 finals. Manu is maybe half the defensive player that Duncan is and Tony is maybe 1/4 as good on that end. Basketball is a 2 way sport you do know that right??Quote:
Originally Posted by thewatcher
This board is amazing. Everybody agree on Tim greatness. Everybody knows he is one of the best big ever. Parker is having a great run and is receiving some consideration. That is great for him. The same may it was great for Manu to be in the discussion in 2005. Why not just be happy for them when it happens?Quote:
Originally Posted by dbreiden83080
I will tell you a secret:
We don't win because Duncan>Lebron, we didn't beat the Suns because our big 3 > their big 3, we do all this because the Spurs are the best team inthe league (You know these Bowen, Finley, Oberto...).
Tim Duncan is my MVP but if Tony get it I will be happy. And if Manu had it in 2005 I would have been happy for him.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mathbzh
I just think that if Manu didn't win it in '05 when he was >>> Duncan, then it'd be kind of fishy to give it to Parker now. In '05, not only did Manu shoot a much better % than Tim and lead the team in assists, but he led the team in +/- with +63, while Duncan was -3. Tony is playing very well right now, but he's not outplaying Tim anywhere near as much as Manu did two years ago. LJ makes the argument for Tim all the time, no matter what the final numbers are, so I suspect he'll make it for this series as well.
haha tony will be the mvp FINALSQuote:
Originally Posted by tim_duncan_fan
do you understand ? mvp FINALS
don't worry ...tada tada... be happy....
i hate tp's haters sorry.
Quote:
Originally Posted by aaronstampler
here we go again... please aaron, stop comparing tp and manu... i don't see your point... As i said in an other thread, this is a childish reaction.
Basically, you say: "ok, my manu didn't win the Finals MVP whereas he played great in 2005 (and to me, he deserved it), so i don't want tony to get the award beacause it would be unfair to manu"
Do you see how stupid it sounds?
Official Tony Parker Topic. USE IT!
LMAO at Duncan lovers gettting offended if parker wins it.
Even on the verge of a championship, the Manu vs. Tony hissy fits won't stop.
Quote:
Originally Posted by aaronstampler
Come on. Who uses +/- for MVP awards?
Tim Duncan outscored Manu, and barely won the voting.
amen. watch Spurs getting blown out tonight while fans discussing stupid shit like finals MVP.Quote:
Originally Posted by ShoogarBear
Tony Parker's contribution this year was amazing. He is one of the main reasons the Spurs won in the regular season and the playoffs.
His game is no longer a secret. He destroys people in the paint, he breaks down anyone off the dribble, he is decent defensively, he is a straight up playa. He's fucking good.
Tonight, he broke out the 3 point shot. I've see this dude before games shoot balls from sitting in a courtside chair, lofting shot after shot while sitting down, swishing 4 out of 5. Dude is a Wizard.
Props to him and Got damn.. I look forward to the next few years of him destroying the rest of the NBA.
:fro
In his playoff career, Tony Parker has at least held par with, if not outplayed, Stephon Marbury, Andre Miller, Jason Kidd, Allen Iverson, Gary Payton (fuckin D. Fish), and Steve Nash (repeatedly).
The only point gaurd that really has Tony fits was Chauncey Billups, which was half to Detroits credit defensively and half to the fact that Tony hadn't developed a jump shot at that point. The Nets and Lakers of the past were able to contain him by focusing their concentration on him, but that is what makes the separation between stars and superstars: the ability to play through that focused attention.
Tony is a confirmed superstar at this stage now. Fuck what all the haters say, a Finals MVP makes up for a few shakey playoff years. He brought it to the biggest stage when this team needed him most, and I for one am relieved to believe that the Spurs may have a second primetime with Parker at the reigns and Duncan in his twilight.
Steve Nash can rack up all the assists he wants with a run and gun, 187-points a game system. If it came down to picking for playground ball, I would go straight for Tony Parker. After all, I always thought you were supposed to pick the best guys first. The guys that are going to win you games.
http://www.tgprinting.com/temp/tony_eva_sex.gif
guess he couldnt wait
found it on another forum roflmao el_locotee
Wait until next year when he develops that 3pt shot. A little Mike Bibby range and it will be over...... Tony Parker = MVP! Nash... pfft, Billups... my ass, Kidd... whatever. Tony put this team on his back all last year, and he did it again in the finals. Parker is the shit!
Tony Parker owns all.
Nash (ringless) < Parker = Malone (ringless) < Duncan. He may not be the greatest of all time, but w/ his shot continuing to develop, he may end up being the most difficult PG to guard IMO (and my opinion is law beyatches)!
I said it before, watch the parade... Tony will not need a float, he shall walk on the water, make the blind see, take out a loaf of bread and feed all the children, and then turn the water he's walking on into wine so we can all get fucked up!