-
Re: Which group is more annoying - The Manu Apologists or The "Fire Pop" Potbangers
I'd say both groups suck. Both groups are annoying as hell.
And I agree with manubili, the third group which is annoying as hell is the "trade-any-of-the-big-three" group. I probably hate that group the most.
And the fourth most annoying group, is a "single-poster" group: rascal.
-
Re: Which group is more annoying - The Manu Apologists or The "Fire Pop" Potbangers
Quote:
Originally Posted by mathbzh
You forgot the new group of "DON'T TOUCH MY TIMMY - PARKER IS A PUSSY" who was giving lessons to "The Manu Apologists" few days ago and is now exposed as the new plague on this board.
the "Dont Touch My Timmy" group and the Manu Apologists are actually the same
-
Re: Which group is more annoying - The Manu Apologists or The "Fire Pop" Potbangers
Quote:
Originally Posted by timvp
Weirdly enough, most modern day Manu Apologists aren't from Argentina. Some of them are but most of the Argentine fans who have been around a while have become Spurs fans instead of Manu fans.
The only thing I have a problem with regarding Manu Apologists is they tear other Spurs players down to try to prop Manu. That's a horrible trait in a supposed fan of a team . . . but also a trait that's rampant in the Manu Apologists camp.
The Church of Manu is respectable. They of course are huge fans of Manu but they are also still Spurs fans. And really, who could be a Spurs fan and not love Manu for how hard he plays and how much he wants to win?
On the other hand, the Manu Apologists are more of a cult that is borderline not Spurs fan material.
Your analysis will got an "A" in human behavior :reading
-
Re: Which group is more annoying - The Manu Apologists or The "Fire Pop" Potbangers
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpursIndonesia
But without Parker Manu won't be in a must win situation game.
:lol
Any stats of Parker's assist to Manu !? :rolleyes
-
Re: Which group is more annoying - The Manu Apologists or The "Fire Pop" Potbangers
So who is part of which group?
Speak up 50 cent!
-
Re: Which group is more annoying - The Manu Apologists or The "Fire Pop" Potbangers
I´m a Manu Apologist,May be the most annoying one,But at the same time love Tony´s game these playoffs,and never said let´s trade any of the big 3 in any thread here.
I just hate people here waiting manu to have an offnight to start bashing him.
Eventhough Right now Manu is the less productive out of the big 3,i would still give him the ball at the clutch(and Pop would as well) in any game even these finals.And that means alot for an NBA player.
-
Re: Which group is more annoying - The Manu Apologists or The "Fire Pop" Potbangers
I'd like to nominate a new group, the "I Hate Tony!" group lead by SpursDynasty 21
-
Re: Which group is more annoying - The Manu Apologists or The "Fire Pop" Potbangers
Quote:
Originally Posted by ArgSpursFan
I´m a Manu Apologist,May be the most annoying one,But at the same time love Tony´s game these playoffs,and never said let´s trade any of the big 3 in any thread here.
I just hate people here waiting manu to have an offnight to start bashing him.
Eventhough Right now Manu is the less productive out of the big 3,i would still give him the ball at the clutch(and Pop would as well) in any game even these finals.And that means alot for an NBA player.
Too bad for Manu you don't need a clutch player when you have a 20+ lead starting the 4th.
-
Re: Which group is more annoying - The Manu Apologists or The "Fire Pop" Potbangers
Quote:
Originally Posted by mathbzh
Too bad for Manu you don't need a clutch player when you have a 20+ lead starting the 4th.
you never know.I would still wait untill these series are over to say such a thing.
-
Re: Which group is more annoying - The Manu Apologists or The "Fire Pop" Potbangers
Quote:
Originally Posted by ArgSpursFan
you never know.I would still wait untill these series are over to say such a thing.
I was talking about game 1 & 2. I would be really happy if Manu could kill game 4 with a Ginobilistic 4th quarter.
-
Re: Which group is more annoying - The Manu Apologists or The "Fire Pop" Potbangers
Quote:
Originally Posted by MadDog73
I'd like to nominate a new group, the "I Hate Tony!" group lead by SpursDynasty 21
that guy TDDPOY or something like that is #1 Parker hater
-
Re: Which group is more annoying - The Manu Apologists or The "Fire Pop" Potbangers
I think we're all too close to this situation to adequately gauge it. If someone predicts that Duncan's going to struggle in tonight's game and he then has a bad game, that person's going to come in tomorrow and say "I told you", but if Duncan goes out and gets a quad double that same person is going to be more happy to see him dominate than he is upset about being wrong.
BTW, quad double tonight for Timmy. Book it.
-
Re: Which group is more annoying - The Manu Apologists or The "Fire Pop" Potbangers
Quote:
Originally Posted by mathbzh
Too bad for Manu you don't need a clutch player when you have a 20+ lead starting the 4th.
Right, like in game 3 the other night...
-
Re: Which group is more annoying - The Manu Apologists or The "Fire Pop" Potbangers
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aggie Hoopsfan
Right, like in game 3 the other night...
Did we ever had a 20+ lead in game 3????????? I didn't speak about game 3 because I like Manu much :(
-
Re: Which group is more annoying - The Manu Apologists or The "Fire Pop" Potbangers
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aggie Hoopsfan
For the simple minded folks on the board, they translate criticism to wanting him fired. I think they all have one of those 'Jumping to Conclusions' mats in their garage from Office Space, too. :lol
:clap :lol
Hire Pop option.
An offensive coordinator. Or make him start implementing what Carlesimo says re ball movement and spacing when the Spurs are bogged down, as Pop occassionally admits to.
-
Re: Which group is more annoying - The Manu Apologists or The "Fire Pop" Potbangers
Quote:
Originally Posted by smeagol
So who is part of which group?
Speak up 50 cent!
If you can't figure out who is in what group based on the threads that are started around here, then you have problems.
It's obvious who is in the "Tony doesn't deserve it because Manu didn't get it in '05" crowd.
-
Re: Which group is more annoying - The Manu Apologists or The "Fire Pop" Potbangers
I havent posted on the subject of the finals mvp, but in regards to that last sentence, i would rephrase it:
"tony deserves it as much as manu did in 05, but because manu didnt get it i expect parker not to get it." now if you think parker has been noticeably better than manu in 05, or duncan less valuable, i've yet to see a convincing argument on those lines.
and it wouldnt bother me much if any of the big 4 (gotta include bo-bo!) got it, just like it didnt bother me much when manu didnt get it. the ring is whats important.
-
Re: Which group is more annoying - The Manu Apologists or The "Fire Pop" Potbangers
Quote:
Originally Posted by diego
I havent posted on the subject of the finals mvp, but in regards to that last sentence, i would rephrase it:
"tony deserves it as much as manu did in 05, but because manu didnt get it i expect parker not to get it." now if you think parker has been noticeably better than manu in 05, or duncan less valuable, i've yet to see a convincing argument on those lines.
and it wouldnt bother me much if any of the big 4 (gotta include bo-bo!) got it, just like it didnt bother me much when manu didnt get it. the ring is whats important.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ArgSpursFan
I´m a Manu Apologist,May be the most annoying one,But at the same time love Tony´s game these playoffs,and never said let´s trade any of the big 3 in any thread here.
I just hate people here waiting manu to have an offnight to start bashing him.
Eventhough Right now Manu is the less productive out of the big 3,i would still give him the ball at the clutch(and Pop would as well) in any game even these finals.And that means alot for an NBA player.
Amen, I am a Manu Apologist and I can relate to what these 2 above say. I thought Manu deserved the trophy in 2005 and probably Tony deserves it now. It's not about Tony not getting it because you have to love what he has done in the first 2 games but I don't think it's fair. It's hard to be Manu these days even though he doesn't say a thing. You are a first class player and has to start from the bench, etc. It's ackward not to see him when they are announcing the starting 5. He still goes out and plays team basketball and you can see him doing the crazy things.
It is clear to me that being on the bench for so long has taken something out of him, he is not quite the same he was before, not even close to 2005. I would ask people for more respect really. Some of you wait for a night off to ask for a manu trade, that's ridiculous. Then when we come out saying Tony deserves it but TD will get it you get pissed off. When we say Manu deserved in 2005 it and it wouldn't be fair for Tony to get it now, you get pissed off. I can see Tony being as good as Manu was 2 years ago and it wasn't enough.
I'm just tired of the whole "Parker is the MVP" because he scores more points. A little respect would be in order now I think.
-
Re: Which group is more annoying - The Manu Apologists or The "Fire Pop" Potbangers
Quote:
Originally Posted by 50 cent
If you can't figure out who is in what group based on the threads that are started around here, then you have problems.
It's obvious who is in the "Tony doesn't deserve it because Manu didn't get it in '05" crowd.
I know I'm not in part of any of those groups.
I was just joking, 50 Cents, I know were posters stand.
-
Re: Which group is more annoying - The Manu Apologists or The "Fire Pop" Potbangers
manu was "only" at 18.7 in 2005 with "bad" games during the series.
tony is at 24 and is the best scorer of the spurs wich is a little bit different.