Does drafting Splitter actually mean Scola is closer?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by timvp

Drafting Splitter didn't really have anything to do with Scola. Splitter was by far the best draft and stash option left on the board. It's just a coincidence that he plays with Scola.

---

I didn't really mean to imply that the Spurs were dealing the cards in a direct effort to entice Scola to come over. But I do think it was an added bonus and perhaps additional incentive. Even if this fact is complete coincidence (which I think likely) the end results on Scola could be the same. The stars may have simply aligned in such a way that the Spurs got their guy at 28 and got a little closer to Scola in the process.

My point is not to argue intent but simply view the result.