Bulter/Scola/Manhimni/Toros/vets
The Spurs purchased the Toros so that the 3 guys who don't suit up nightly will get some real playing time. The want the league to change the rule that only lets them assign a player 3 times a year. I suspect they will assign 2 or 3 players every time they go on an extended roadtrip. I expect Mahimni to be one of those players. Then White and Williams. Guys to replace Horry, Barry and Finley after next season.
I don't really understand some contibutors passion for Butler and Scola next season. Butler has no chance of beating out Elson. From what I've seen he's lumbersome with no vertical lift or shot blocking ability. He doesn't complement Tim like Elson does. As for Scola his value in trades seems to decrease yearly. If he did come here who's minutes would he take at 6'9". Bonner? Pop really like's Bonner' game and will give him increased minutes this season. He's as tall as Butler, more mobile to rebounds and can drill the 3 which is what Pop likes in PF's. Has anyone noticed how Matt bulked up or just got more defined when he was injured. That's what Pop likes. Can't play then work on the parts of your body that need improvement.
If either White and/or Williams pans out as a possible replacements for Bowens/Finley, I suspect that the Spurs will try and package Udrih, Butler and the rights to Scola for a hi draft pick or a young PG[think Portland] who will not mind learning behind Vaughn who learned the Spurs system in record. We really don't need a guy like Duhon who will demand more playing time than Beno got because he's not going to get in barring an injury to Tony. Finally, with Splitter coming in 2008 Butler absolutely has no future here. Tiago is taller, more mobile and has a better inside game than Butler. He also has played Euro ball for 4 years compared to Butler playing at a HS prep school and then with the Knicks[which is about the same thing]. Eventually, Mahimni and Splitter will be seeing major minutes together.
Re: Bulter/Scola/Manhimni/Toros/vets
So, you think both White and Williams make the team?
And you think they'll sign Mahinmi.
I doubt it. No roster room.
Re: Bulter/Scola/Manhimni/Toros/vets
I keep saying it....I will be shocked if Butler ever plays significant minutes for the Spurs....we have too many better options
Re: Bulter/Scola/Manhimni/Toros/vets
The league is going to change the rule about assigning a player only 3 times because the Spurs want them to? Pretty sure that wont happen...the rule might eventually get changed, but its going to take more than the Spurs wanting it to happen.
Re: Bulter/Scola/Manhimni/Toros/vets
Lots of ignorant rookies on this thread (Kori excluded obviously).
Still waiting on the Lord of the Rings dork to explain to me how we sign Williams, White, and Ian to two roster spots. That must be some new math.
Re: Bulter/Scola/Manhimni/Toros/vets
Udrih gets traded to Cleveland or Portland. Butler gets cut or included with Udrih. Either White or Williams is kept but not both. Ely is gone. We now have 3 roster spots for Ian, Williams or White, and a young PG prospect like Koponen from Portland. We can wait on a pg because Manu or Barry can fill in minutes after Tony and Vaughn.
I think Beno is viewed favorably but several other teams that don't play as structured as we do and he would fit in well with his shooting and court sense. If we keep him on the bench next year I believe we lose him and get nothing in return.
As far as the developmental league changing the rules for the Spurs, I think those discussions took place before Holt put up the $$$. Otherwise why buy a team that has little value to you. The Spurs would have simply done what they did last year. I also think a lot of other teams would like that rule changed for the same reason---players on the IL need playing time not time in suits behind the bench cheerleading. Makes sense for most teams. The league changed the rule making all 15 roster players playoff eligible because the other rule was stupid and so is this one.
Re: Bulter/Scola/Manhimni/Toros/vets
I guess we always have to get some ignoramus who has to get insulting whenever they disagree with someone. I figure the Aggie designation says it all.
Count: Ely gone. Udrih gone. Butler gone{ Cut or traded for picks.]
THREE roster spots. As I wrote in non-aggie English we will only keep White OR Williams not both. Two roster spots. Perhaps Mahimni because he really needs to get NBA type experience at Spurs practice or in Austin. ONE spot. That might go to White/Williams or to Udrih's replacement as 3rd point guard. Just speculating but I think Mahimni's growth would be accelerated here rather then another year in France.
I guess insulting a book that was voted by most top tier, literary journals as " the most influential novel of the 20th century" is beyond intelligent thought. What did that have to do with what I wrote?
Re: Bulter/Scola/Manhimni/Toros/vets
Why would Portland trade for Beno when
1) you have an ex-Spur front office guy in Pritchard who knows enough about Beno to stay away
2) Portland already has Jack, Koponen, and Taurean Green at point (with Rodriguez able to play some minutes there)?
Hypothetically I guess Cleveland could be a trade option, but the supposed deal for the draft didn't go down, so that's looking doubtful.
We cut Butler? :lmao Yeah, the Spurs are going to cut a 22 year old big man with potential just to appease lotr trekkie and bring in Williams and Ian to go with White.
I'm not insulting you because I disagree with you, I'm insulting you because you have to be smoking crack to come up with the personnel moves that you have.
I don't care if it's Aggie English, non-English, or whatever other cute dialect it takes to communicate in your language, you're making an awful lot of assumptions about the activities of a front office not known for the type of moves you're advocating.
And I didn't insult the book (how did we even get on that topic?), I was calling out you (with your user name). :lol
I'll call out anyone who thinks that Portland is going to hand us Koponen for the steaming pile of dog shit that is Beno Udrih, much less think the Spurs can pull off that deal and then would turn around and waive Jackie Butler.
Stick to reading books.
Re: Bulter/Scola/Manhimni/Toros/vets
Parker/Duhon/Vaughn
Finley/Barry/white
Bowen/Manu/Sanikidze
TD/Horry/Bonner
Oberto/Elson/Mahinmi
- I like the trade of butler/Beno/Scola for Chic. Duhon and future #1 for the reason of getting butlers 2.5 mil off the books for 2008/2009. (I know it doesnt look great but it nets the spurs future pick and saves $ for next off-season)
- With 1 spot still open on the roster I would to maybe even bring in Sankidze.
- My 3 to Austin would be Mahinmi , Sank. and white.
Re: Bulter/Scola/Manhimni/Toros/vets
Duhon is not worth Scola/Butler and Beno..the Bulls are an up & coming team & the future first will most likely be in the later part of the first round...that is an absolute horrible deal for the Spurs..to give all that up to rent Duhon for 1 year..no thanks.
Re: Bulter/Scola/Manhimni/Toros/vets
IMO:
1] The Spurs purchased the Toros to accelerate the development of those players they are counting on to replace Horry, Barry and Finley by 2008. That really doesn't work when you can only send them their 3 times.
2] Beno may suck according to some future NBA GM's but he was as good as what the Cavs showed us in games 3 and 4.
3] I simply think Mahimni will develop faster if he plays here and in Austin.
4] I think the Spurs are looking for a SF who can do what Bruce has done. Play unrelenting D and hit the open 3. Neither White or Williams can do that right now so I think the Spurs will keep the guy who is most committed to playing D first.
5] Pop is a very smart guy who likes smart players. Butler was not smart coming in out of shape on day one. His playing minutes were less than his weight. Will he stay in shape after the summer leagues? He has also not been too impressive in the summer league so far playing against guys who don't even have contracts.
Our top 12 spot are set unless we get an offer we can't refuse[book reference]. I think #'s 13 to 15 will be young players we will need in 2008-2009---not dead end players.
Re: Bulter/Scola/Manhimni/Toros/vets
Quote:
Originally Posted by Big P
Duhon is not worth Scola/Butler and Beno..the Bulls are an up & coming team & the future first will most likely be in the later part of the first round...that is an absolute horrible deal for the Spurs..to give all that up to rent Duhon for 1 year..no thanks.
First off do you really think Butler is going to get much PT with the Spurs? I would glady get ride of his contract for FA signing in 2008..
Secondly, have you heard of anyone wanting to give a 1st rd pick for scola? I havn't so if the bulls give us theirs (I could care less where in the 1st, still better than the second) I would gladly accept!!
Third, Beno vs. Duhon.I will take my chances with duhon for 1 year since the last couple yrs Beno has sucked..
Re: Bulter/Scola/Manhimni/Toros/vets
Butler has a TO after this year, so if we want to drop him to sign someone else in 08 we can.
Secondly, if we cant get a DECENT first rounder for him, I would rather Scola stay in Europe & never come to the NBA.
We are talking about the third PG, so I dont think it matters if its Beno or Duhon...unlike Beno, Duhon has documented problems with alcohol & I doubt the Spurs would be stupid enough to give up Scolas rights to get a 3rd string PG with personal problems for 1 year...find a better trade for Scola, Duhon is not it.
Re: Bulter/Scola/Manhimni/Toros/vets
Bottom line:
Beno, Butler and whomever replaces Ely[White /Williams] will get virtually no playing time again next season[barring injury]. Agreee or Disagree?
Therefore why keep those two useless contracts rather then replace them with players who will be functional in 2008-20009? IMO whomever fills those last three spots should have future value not just playing out the contract string. After the 2008 season Barry, Finley and Horry will be gone and Bruce will be a year older. You really can't bring in 3 or 4 young players in one season the way we play. Two this year and 2 next season. That's the purpose in buying the Toros. They certainly will not be a big money maker of Holt.
Re: Bulter/Scola/Manhimni/Toros/vets
aggy calling someone a dork. I've officially seen it all.
http://www.bevosports.com/images/agg...eeze-small.jpg
Re: Bulter/Scola/Manhimni/Toros/vets
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loose Cannon
aggy calling someone a dork. I've officially seen it all.
:rollin
Re: Bulter/Scola/Manhimni/Toros/vets
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loose Cannon
:lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :clap
Re: Bulter/Scola/Manhimni/Toros/vets
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loose Cannon
Yeah, because the stereotypical dumbasses in the Corps exemplify us all :rolleyes
Re: Bulter/Scola/Manhimni/Toros/vets
Re: Bulter/Scola/Manhimni/Toros/vets
Quote:
Originally Posted by Help A Brother Out
That is not the Hook Em Horns hand salute. :rolleyes
Re: Bulter/Scola/Manhimni/Toros/vets
I recently read somewhere in a Euro publication that Mahamni did not expect to resign in Europe next season. Maybe his injury changes that. Either way I don't understand the orgasmic joy over Butler glued to the bench for another year and then being replaced by Splitter next season. At 23 Spiltter may also need a year of tutoring to play our style.When we drafted Ginobile most people gasped at the choice. That pick was made about intangibles in his game. I suspect Mahimni was chosen by the same people for the same reasons. If Mahimni is a 0 for next year then Butler is Antarctic subzero.
Re: Bulter/Scola/Manhimni/Toros/vets
Professional coaches and scouts and FO people are paid thousands and sometimes millions of dollars to make these decisions.
Our team's professionals have made more right decisions than wrong ones and so we'v wound up with 4 Championships. Some of these guys are getting a chance to show what they can do in Summer League and aren't doing so hot.
If they leave Javtokas or Mahimimi or Sanizwhatever in Europe then I trust they are making informed decisions.
Re: Bulter/Scola/Manhimni/Toros/vets
Quote:
Originally Posted by Big P
The league is going to change the rule about assigning a player only 3 times because the Spurs want them to? Pretty sure that wont happen...the rule might eventually get changed, but its going to take more than the Spurs wanting it to happen.
Im sure the Lakers are asking for a change in the rule as well, due to the fact that they also own a DLeague team. hopefully this rule does get changed in our favor