Spurs extend Tim Duncan for about 40 million for 2 years!!! He took a lower price to allow the Spurs more flexibility too!
http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/news;_yl...yhoo&type=lgns
Printable View
Spurs extend Tim Duncan for about 40 million for 2 years!!! He took a lower price to allow the Spurs more flexibility too!
http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/news;_yl...yhoo&type=lgns
link source?
wow
Damn, I wish I could take an $11 million pay cut and still get paid $40 mill!
Bad. Ass.
Duncan will take less than maximum salary
By Johnny Ludden, Yahoo! Sports
October 29, 2007
With NBA commissioner David Stern set to present Tim Duncan his fourth championship ring on Tuesday, the Spurs forward has made it clear he has no plans to leave the court – or San Antonio – anytime soon.
Duncan has reached agreement with the Spurs on a two-year, $40 million extension that figures to give the team enough salary-cap flexibility to continue to surround him with a competitive supporting cast in the waning seasons of his career, two sources with knowledge of the deal said Monday.
By signing the extension, which is expected to be finalized within the next few days, Duncan forfeits his option to become a free agent after this season. He will now be under contract with the Spurs until the summer of 2012.
The extension hardly comes as a surprise. Duncan, 31, said prior to last season’s NBA Finals he felt as healthy as he’s been in years and hoped to continue playing “as long as I can.”
But what is notable about the deal are the terms: Though Duncan is eligible to receive a two-year extension worth about $51 million under the NBA’s collective bargaining agreement, he agreed to nearly $11 million less because it could potentially afford the Spurs greater flexibility to pursue free agents after the 2009-10 season.
Duncan and his agent, Lon Babby, met with Spurs coach Gregg Popovich and general manager R.C. Buford at Popovich’s house prior to the start of training camp. Well aware of Duncan’s value to franchise – the Spurs likely would not be in San Antonio had he not guided them to their first title in 1999 – Popovich and Buford presented him with a maximum offer during the meeting. But they also made a detailed presentation of their plans for the team’s long-term future and showed Duncan the possible impact of his accepting a lesser extension.
After a few weeks of deliberation, Duncan agreed to the $40 million extension. He will make $22.2 million in the final year of his current contract, with his salary dropping to about $18.7 million in the first year of the extension.
Duncan will be 34 when the extension begins. Tony Parker is the only other player currently scheduled to be under contract following the 2009-10 season, but the Spurs also will be in position to re-sign their third star, Manu Ginobili, that summer if they want.
The Spurs also are expected to eventually extend Popovich’s contract to coincide with that of Duncan.
I wonder how many stars would actually leave 11 million on the table for the betterment of the team... This kind of stuff makes me proud to be a Spurs fan.
I like how Pop is having his contract extended to coincide with Duncan's.
Ludden just pwned Ronald McDonald there. Although it really isn't fair, since Ludden still probably has better team contacts than McDonald.
There must be something more to it than this. Probably an understanding that when he retires, he'll get part ownership.
Either that, or Peter Holt will pocket the $11 mil. :smokin
Wow. What an example. Awesome
Good job, Ludden :lol
Tim's the man for taking that much less money. :tu
What a message he's sending out to potential free agents: I left money on the table so you can come win a title with me.
Respect.
This team and it's players are special. It'll be a sad day when the Spurs are like every other team out there.
Wow.
I literally don't know what to say.
Huge props to Duncan :tu
[QUOTEBut they also made a detailed presentation of their plans for the team’s long-term future and showed Duncan the possible impact of his accepting a lesser extension.[/QUOTE]
What I'd give to take a peek at those long-term plans... :reading :clap
Jesus!
I nominate Tim for NBA sainthood! The man virtually carries 4 Spurs teams comprised of very different supporting casts, to NBA titles and still has enough humility in him to do this. Seems too good to be true, perhaps there something under the table here... or it may be that Tim is just this good a sportsman.
Props to the Spurs for presenting it in this manner. I'm not sure how many other organizations do it this way. They re-assured Duncan from the get-go of negotiations that he could take the max if he wanted, but then also presented reasons why he shouldn't.Quote:
Popovich and Buford presented him with a maximum offer during the meeting. But they also made a detailed presentation of their plans for the team’s long-term future and showed Duncan the possible impact of his accepting a lesser extension.
Nice job all around.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hemotivo
It still works for me.
Such wonderful news and such a respectful gesture by the Spurs and such a team-first gesture by a guy who is among the great teammates to ever play the game. Props all the way around!!
Now let's get this sucker started . . . .
It's there.Quote:
Originally Posted by Hemotivo
2010 Master Plan - book it. :lol
GREAT BY A CHAMPION..
Look at Kobe, took max money and crying foul now...
I'm stunned, really. Leaving $11M on the table because he wants to win is beyond awesome. The guy has four championships and just proved beyond any reasonable doubt that he's all about winning. He could easily be satisfied with his four championships and cashed in. The Spurs would be good with or without the extra roster flexibility.
But to be at the top of your profession and continue to do everything you can to ensure continued success is extremely commendable. And that's an understatement.
These are the times when a Spurs fan should be proud of being a Spurs fan. The team you root for is all about winning ... and that's all we can really ask.
:tu X 10
Fixed, thanksQuote:
Originally Posted by Johnny_Blaze_47
First Beno gone, now this. And I've already got that "Well at least there's a game tomorrow" reassurance.
Fan-freaking-tastic.
I was hoping this would happen. Shame on me for wishing that Duncan would sacrifice some $$ at the end of his career for the betterment of the franchise. Deep down, I didn't think he would actually do it. But ho-lee-cow... he done did it. Unbelievable.
When all is said and done, Tim Duncan will have meant more to his franchise than any player in League history not named Bill Russell.
Not only that, but he's the one, the ONLY person in the league who could take the max and nobody would begrudge him a penny.Quote:
Originally Posted by timvp
I still think he's getting a part ownership out of the deal, though.
I do not think NBA players can be owner/part owner when they are still playing..Quote:
Originally Posted by ShoogarBear
Nice to see a player who really is about winning. Big props to Duncan and to the FO.
God am I dreaming? So much good news in such a short span of time!
IIRC, that'd be against the CBA rules. The Spurs would be punished severely for promising part ownership down the line. Plus Holt wasn't at the meeting, which to me would be mandatory if such talks occurred.Quote:
Originally Posted by ShoogarBear
I don't think there is anything else to the story other than Duncan just decided to take less money. I need to see how this will affect the books down the line to figure out what the Spurs told Duncan, but I assume they pointed to a summer in which they'll have the caproom to open up enough room to bring in a max free agent.
His character shows in everything he does.Quote:
Originally Posted by timvp
Again, like he does on the court, he has shown us the kind of man he his. The kind of team player he is.
I'm proud to be a Spurs fan.
I'm prouder to be a Duncan fan.
He wants 8 titles. Why not?
Leave it to the Spurs and Duncan to do something like this and no one hears a peep till it's done.
I don't like it and let me tell you why....
Duncan has used his opting out and signing elsewhere leverage to force the Spurs into being commited to winning...he never let them get comfortable and think they could stop being competitive in FA and in pursuing every advantage...
Now...that leverage is gone and Duncan will no longer be able to apply it.
And that makes me a little nervous...Duncan's pressure on the FO is the reason we've won the last 3 titles....
I applaud Duncan for doing this of course, and I'm happy to see Duncan get rewarded with guranteed money up till 2012...
But I liked him being able to put pressure on the FO to surround him with talent...it's a big reason we've won these titles.
People are always asking about the difference between Drob and Duncan...that's it right there...Drob wouldn't put a gun to their head to field a winning team, he'd do it to make them a community focused organization, but not a championship contender...Duncan did put that pressure on the Spurs...every couple of years he's been able to apply it...and now he won't be able to apply it anymore. Makes me just a little bit nervous...the inmates now control the asylum.
I understand that an open or even implied verbal or written agreement would be Glen Taylor-stupid. But we've all been assuming that there has been some kind of an understanding between the Spurs and Bruce Bowen while they were renegotiating his contract downward and signing him at below-market rates. They could have been using the same sort of tactics.Quote:
Originally Posted by timvp
Also, DRob got a small part ownership in the Spurs when he retired. I suspect that he didn't pay full price for that.
Are there any precedents for this? Has any other marquee player agreed to less money from the same team?
Duncan should get something named after him for this. maybe Duncantown, Texas? any takers?
-------------------------
magnusdrakenkrauss
The fact that Duncan is signed long term will likely attract more talent than any threat by him (real or implied) to leave.Quote:
Originally Posted by whottt
Seriously, it has been damn good to be a Spurs fan in the Duncan era. I don't think there is one other team, front office and roster, in the whole league, that gives their following such a feeling of easiness. Now, I understand us Spurs fans like to overreact to every little move by our front office, but really think about it...
Yeah you can bitch about some stupid trade (ex. Scola) and you can criticize Holt for being cheap, but is there another front office that has managed to build a franchise like this, where respect and professionalism are the norm? No scandal, no controversy, just continued, harmonious success... and behind it all, two great selfless sportsmen Tim and Pop!
Its good to be a Spurs fan! Here's to the good times, past, present and by the looks of it, a great and prosperous future! :toast
Weren't we redently discussing the "different" Duncan of these last couple of post seasons?Quote:
Originally Posted by whottt
The Duncan that's more vocal? A little mean, if you will?
He'll still apply pressure on the FO to win.
He's their golden ticket. They know it.
They'll keep him happy, keep a contending team around him.
This is not the Lakers.
Duncan doesn't need $ or opt out threats to get what he needs from the Spurs.
That was why I made my only half-joke about Holt pocketing the money.Quote:
Originally Posted by whottt
But what Duncan loses in contractual pressure he gains in media pressure.
What do you think woul happen if he went public with a statement like "I left $11 million on the table and now ownership isn't using it to improve the team"? That's pretty good leverage.
Hmm, are they any certain rookie deals ending after 2009-10?
Maybe one Greg Oden, Kevin Durant...
One of my favorite posters (KBP) recently said: The Spurs aren't fools. It's true. They know that Duncan is their ticket to championships. They also know that as long as he is here they are legit contenders every season, and they need to surround him with talent to get the job done. No need to worry about it... Duncan doesn't need leverage. He has the fo's respect.
Well, they had to find the money somewhere to pay pop's salary.. :smokin
This is phenomenal news, and huge props to Tim Duncan for leaving that much change on the table for the good of the franchise :tu
Quote:
Originally Posted by duncan228
He's got no leverage to do it anymore...this contract takes Duncan to a reasonably advanced age, to the point where you have to consider he will no longer have that kind of superstar/the franchise leverage at the end of it.
Quote:
He's their golden ticket. They know it.
And for the first time in his career...they've got him by the balls, instead of vice versa.
Quote:
They'll keep him happy, keep a contending team around him.
This is not the Lakers.
Duncan doesn't need $ or opt out threats to get what he needs from the Spurs.
The hell he doesn't...it wasn't but about 3 years ago Tony Parker nearly walked over 2 million dollars...
You never trust the business part of it over the individual...
The Spurs have never been able to completely be certain Duncan was going to spend the rest of his career here...until now. Now it's virtually a done deal...and he's got no more leverage against them. And no...I don't trust them to work as hard at it without that leverage being applied.
Of course I'm happy this makes it a virtual lock Duncan will finish his career as a Spur...and as always...it speaks well of Duncan that he took one for the team...
But you know...he did this the last time as well. Left money on the table and didn't take the max he could have...and he also had that opt out to hold over their heads, at a point when he could still be at his dominant peak.
I don't mean to make it sound like it's a negative...because it really isn't...at the same time, I don't trust the business aspect of the Spurs to always place a priority on winning...
this is GOOD NEWS ! .Quote:
Originally Posted by usckk
Tim Duncan shows how he loves San Antonio and this team.
:elephant
Quote:
Originally Posted by whottt
Dude..STFU already...go find another team to cheer for..its apparent that the Spurs can't do anything right..We only extended him by 2 years for $11 mil than what he could & should have taken, now we have him by the balls and he wont want to win..classic.
Potential Free Agents in 2010:
Wade
LeBron
Carmelo
What a wonderful epoch to be a Spurs fan, Tim + Pop, pure gold.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ShoogarBear
This is true...and Duncan may have thought that leverage would be more powerful by then then another optout....
But anyone that thinks Duncan doesn't apply this pressure to the Spurs, extremely effectively....hasn't been watching his career. This is not something that just sounds good....Duncan has always been noncommital about his future in SA...and he used that to manipulate the Spurs into being a winning organization...
He also used it, to manipulate the city of SA into building the AT&T Center...
This is what Duncan did that made the biggest impact on this team IMO...
Most guys want longterm deals and max years with max dollars...Duncan has never gone for it...not a single time, and it's highly unusual...it's also kept the Spurs on their toes for his entire career, and made them the championship organization they have become.
What an awesome off/preseason!!!! We picked up some nice players, Beno is gone, Duncan is sticking around (at a discount, no less)...and now? It's officially game day! :danceclub
I just started laughing when I read that. I wanted to see how you could spin this.Quote:
Originally Posted by whottt
1) Duncan can now say "I sacrificed $11M so you better go out and spend it on who I say". That's a pretty powerful piece of ammunition Duncan has at his disposal.Quote:
Originally Posted by whottt
If Holt tries to be cheap, Duncan can pull the "I gave you money" card. That's perhaps the most powerful card that a player can use on an owner. Duncan could tell Holt that he's leaving and Holt wouldn't care because he could sell the team for like a $400M profit. But if Duncan tells Holt to spend the money he gave him, there's little else Holt could do than just spend the money.
2) Duncan has been under contract for a while now. It's not like he was going year to year to force the Spurs to keep winning. And really, Duncan hasn't been a threat to leave since the 2000 season. No team can pay him anywhere close to as much as the Spurs can since the CBA was changed.
3) This extension was expected. By your wording, you act surprised that Duncan got extended. Duncan confirmed last year that he'd extend his deal. I don't see a way to spin this to say Duncan has lost some clout. If anything, Duncan just became higher on the food chain in the decision-making process and now he has tangible reasons for why Holt should pony up money when asked.
If you remember right, it was Duncan who said that he'd pay the difference between what Holt was offering Parker and what Parker wanted. Duncan saying that had no effect on the negotiations. However, in the future, Duncan can point to the money he contributed to the Spurs and say he already paid the money. Basically, Duncan will have much more say than he had previously.
You STFU you illiterate fuck...learn to read first, then post.Quote:
Originally Posted by Big P
Yeah....I believe David Robinson did, for the very reason of keeping Duncan. I think the whole D-Rob, CWebb fiasco put him in a bad light....Quote:
Originally Posted by MagnusKrauss
$244K per season game.
You do give me food for thought.Quote:
Originally Posted by whottt
I can see each of your points clearly.
But I trust Duncan.
I don't think he would have done this if he didn't trust the organization to do the right thing by him.
He's brought 4 Championships to this team.
And he's not done.
I think everyone knew Duncan would retire a Spur. Whether he had an opt out or not. He helped them by leaving $ to continue to build this team. Around him.
I don't think they'll break his trust in them. I think they'll stay committed to winning. He's shown them that he can bring the Trophy home with different casts of characters around him. They'll bring him what he needs over these next few years. And he'll bring them the Championships.
I'll be interested to see how this plays out in the national media. If it was Garnett or Kobe who took less money to help the club, they'd be hailed as saints. With Duncan, I'll be mildly surprised if it gets much more than a mention.
Tim could always demand a trade, if he feels the Spurs are not builing around him like they should be. That could be alot of leverage...
Anyways I am so happy he will be with us an extra 2 years. He is very loyal. Hopefully this rubs off on a certain point guard who has talked about leaving when his contract is up.
Hey...you're the one on the Spurs for being about $$$ instead of winning this past summer.Quote:
Originally Posted by timvp
True...and I agreed with Shoogar when he made that point.Quote:
1) Duncan can now say "I sacrificed $11M so you better go out and spend it on who I say". That's a pretty powerful piece of ammunition Duncan has at his disposal.
He may have decided that's better than another opt out at the age of 33 or so.
Quote:
If Holt tries to be cheap, Duncan can pull the "I gave you money" card. That's perhaps the most powerful card that a player can use on an owner. Duncan could tell Holt that he's leaving and Holt wouldn't care because he could sell the team for like a $400M profit. But if Duncan tells Holt to spend the money he gave him, there's little else Holt could do than just spend the money.
2) Duncan has been under contract for a while now. It's not like he was going year to year to force the Spurs to keep winning. And really, Duncan hasn't been a threat to leave since the 2000 season. No team can pay him anywhere close to as much as the Spurs can since the CBA was changed.
3) This extension was expected. By your wording, you act surprised that Duncan got extended. Duncan confirmed last year that he'd extend his deal. I don't see a way to spin this to say Duncan has lost some clout. If anything, Duncan just became higher on the food chain in the decision-making process and now he has tangible reasons for why Holt should pony up money when asked.
If you remember right, it was Duncan who said that he'd pay the difference between what Holt was offering Parker and what Parker wanted. Duncan saying that had no effect on the negotiations. However, in the future, Duncan can point to the money he contributed to the Spurs and say he already paid the money. Basically, Duncan will have much more say than he had previously.
It could be he actually increased his leverage over what another opt out would have given him...due to the age he would have been.
I'll concede that point...
At the same time...I've gotten used to that leverage Duncan had...I've grown quite fond of it...and I've marveled at the way he's used it to prod the Spurs where he wanted them to go...
The thing about Holt is....
The worry of loss of Duncan to FA has always been to the Spurs...not just about championships, not about PR, but about winning period...about ticket sales, about playoff revenue.
If he walked there was always a chance all that would go out the window...now he's just got PR or retirement leverage, they can tell him(and us) to FO, and still make the playoffs, sell tickets etc, assuming he doesn't retire. I don't know that'll be as effective.
I'll miss him having the Spurs by the balls....
Just sayin'.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BSPN
What a gesture by Tim Duncan. He didn't have to take less. He deserved every bit of that $11,000,000 and more. Everybody would have been happy that he stayed with the Spurs. In a present day where A-Rod (who can't get the job done when it counts) turns down a 5 year contract for $30 million/year, for him to take $11 million less for the better of the team is unreal, simply amazing.
I'm shocked and very proud of Tim Duncan.
Thanks Tim. Your actions speak very loud.
wow:wowQuote:
Originally Posted by Gooshie
:elephant
any big men? I think I'd leave LeBroom's name out of contention. He wants to be one of the richest men on the World. S.A.might not be IT.
It brought memories of how $1m made a difference in re-signing Parker the last time. (Duncan even offered to pay, only it wasn't allowed). It took how many days? It amazes me Duncan didn't mind an $$11m cut this time :lol
Duncan did almost the same thing after 2002.
I sure hope Tim talked this over with Amy first . . .
When was the last time anyone thought Duncan was serious about leaving?Quote:
Originally Posted by whottt
Once Duncan re-signed in 2000 and with the CBA rules as they are, there has been virtually no chance he could walk. There was a small chance around the Steve Smith era if things started spiraling downward and yet the Spurs didn't react by spending more money to appease Duncan. In fact they let free agents walk and relied on the draft. That doesn't sound like a franchise that is in a panic mode to improve right away.
And once he re-signed again in 2003, he was under contract all the way through next summer. What leverage was he using for the last two championships? He had no "I'mma leave if you don't spend money" leverage. If he couldn't get Holt to pay Parker $2M over six-years, that shows how far his leverage had slipped.
Now he has actual tangible leverage that he can flex instead of just saying he's going to leave at the age of 33 and take less money to join the Memphis Grizzlies or whoever has salary cap room next year :lol
That wasn't really comparable. If I remember correctly, he opted out of his contract and signed for more money, however the first year paid him less than if he didn't opt out. By doing that, it opened up about $1.5M of cap room the Spurs could use to go after free agents that summer.Quote:
Originally Posted by whottt
He didn't actually give up money, he just rearranged his year to year percentage increases, basically.
I'm not sure if Chris Bosh has an opt-out clause in 2010 like those 3 or not.Quote:
Originally Posted by milkyway21
I think the most realistic target would be Wade. By that time, Shaq and Riley will be all but gone, and he'll be looking for a new place. He knows what it takes to win, and he knows first-hand how a Hall of Fame big man and a Hall of Fame coach can make life easier for him.
Plus, it seems as if Pop and Wade have a good relationship from the 2004 Olympics.
Sad but true.Quote:
Originally Posted by FromWayDowntown
I get alerts on Duncan from various sources. So far tonight not a word.
Everything with Kobe's name in it I get multiples of the second it happens.
I will say it again though.
I think he's the best in this league.
On and off the court.
It's the NBA's and the media's loss that they haven't found a way that they can market him better.
I'm glad I follow him.
It's an honor to be a Duncan fan. And not just tonight.
Except for the seven year MAX deal he's on now, you mean. He signed it in 2003, and while it had the year 5 opt out clause (which he now cannot use), that's pretty standard these days. Tim had a 3 year rookie contract, one short 3 year MAX deal, and one full length MAX deal. He also has all of the leverage he needs, as he can simply retire any time he feels the Spurs aren't putting a Championship product on the floor.Quote:
Originally Posted by whottt
I'm going to challenge you on this point, Duncan was non commital when his last contract was up..Quote:
Originally Posted by timvp
And just to prove he meant it for the sake of this argument...Duncan didn't take the home town deal on his last contract...IIRC, he took the deal he could have gotten from any team....the six year deal.
Oh I'm not surprised they wanted to extend him...I am surprised he changed his strategy though...Quote:
3) This extension was expected. By your wording, you act surprised that Duncan got extended.
Then again...
This summer was the first time I've ever heard Duncan clearly say, with no qualifieers he planned on finishing his career as a Spur and wanted to do so.
Yeah..that wasn't a threat to leave.Quote:
Duncan confirmed last year that he'd extend his deal. I don't see a way to spin this to say Duncan has lost some clout. If anything, Duncan just became higher on the food chain in the decision-making process and now he has tangible reasons for why Holt should pony up money when asked.
If you remember right, it was Duncan who said that he'd pay the difference between what Holt was offering Parker and what Parker wanted. Duncan saying that had no effect on the negotiations.
I'll concede that...Quote:
However, in the future, Duncan can point to the money he contributed to the Spurs and say he already paid the money.
Quote:
Basically, Duncan will have much more say than he had previously.
I won't concede that...I don't think he has as much leverage now as he's had in the past. But he might have more now than he would have if he waited till the opt out...that's a legitimate point.
I hope you're right though...and I hope the Spurs honor what he did in the spirit it was intended...but it's one thing for Pop and RC to want do that...and it's entirely another to get Holt to do it...without the threat of losing his mealticket. Then again...his mealticket value probably wouldn't be as much as it has been by the time this contract ran out.
Quote:
Originally Posted by exstatic
False...the deal he's on now is not the max deal he could have gotten...he did not take all the money he could have gotten on his last contract.
He might have taken the 7 year deal, but he didn't take everything he could have gotten...we made a big deal about it on the forum at the time.
I don't know enough about the CBA(then or now) to know the specifics...but I know he didn't take the max he could have gotten.
Quote:
Originally Posted by timvp
Hmmm...I'm pretty sure he left some money on the table on that deal. Maybe I'm wrong...it could have been something like you said there...but it seemed like he did leave money on the table on his last deal.
Quote:
Originally Posted by exstatic
A retirement won't cause a fan revolt/(ticket backlash) like him leaving for another team becuse the Spurs won't commit to winning...it's not the same kind of leverage.
One more reason for me to have Duncan as my favourite player. Props to his parents and whoever educated him while he was growing up. You don't see people like Duncan very often, you only hear about the greedy ones. I know he doesn't really need more $$, he won't miss those 11mi. But what he did shows his type of character and that is what separates him from other NBA stars.
Less :greedy , more :flag:, that's a true winner mentality.
:clap :toast
:worthy: Tim Duncan
duncan didnt just loss 11m, isnt the new CBA agreement around the corner?
he shouldve wait after it like how the lebron class took 3yr deals instead of max deals...and see what the new cba had to offer....
The real story here is not that Duncan will keep playing for the Spurs (which we all knew) but rather that he will play through 2112 (which we could only wonder about).
That could be a lot more rings.
I think Duncan has a sense of history and wants to write some -- as much to tweak the hypocrites who pay lip service to all the right things and then rush in for the glitz as for anything else.
Exactly! Very few NBA stars would ever consider not taking the maximum offered them (and the FO did offer the $51mil!).Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe Schmoogins
David set the standard, and Tim follows in his footsteps.
Our guys ROCK. :fro
Duncan :elephant :clap
seems like a fair deal to me, once you take into consideration income tax free compared to other states....
im rich biatches
Props to Duncan. Classy move...Classy guy. He just wants to win and this just shows it.
Man, that is awesome to have Tim on the Spurs for at least two more years after 2010. What a great day to be a Spurs fan: two more years from our franchise's best player, AND he leaves ~ $5 million extra in cap room to help the team re-sign Manu and maybe pick up another impact player in 10-11.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MagnusKrauss
Didn't Shaq do this a few years back? Or did he extend his deal for longer but less per year? Somebody with more knowledge than me should know, but I'm sure I heard something like this a few years ago?
Quote:
Originally Posted by hsxvvd
Taking pay cuts isn't something Shaq is known for.
I think KG did something like that, but I don't think Shaq's done anything of the sort. If he did? He did it kicking and screaming all the ay.
Wow. Just, wow. :toast x a gabajillion to Timmy for this.
I'm 100% excited over this. A player w/ all-star caliber can join us :lol. Duncan is staying a Spur. TP is getting better. Manu is healthy. Duncan who made those 4 titles possible is locked up, we won't be chasing him for more yrs.Quote:
AND he leaves ~ $5 million extra in cap room to help the team re-sign Manu and maybe pick up another impact player in 10-11.
San Antonio you are so lucky :angel.
I can't wait for the NBA season to begin.
Great news. :elephant
A team first move made by a team first player.
In fact Duncan didn't really turn $11M but $9M. Duncan could have sign a $51M/2 years extension but it would have almost for sure been adjusted to a $49M/2 years extension at the start of the 2010/2011 season. It's because of a rule on players above the maximum salary.
We can too start to think at the 2010 master plan. :smokin
Tim Duncan is panels better than any sports star anywhere.
I thought you didn't believe in master plans?Quote:
Originally Posted by Bruno
:hat
:clap :clap Saint Duncan
D-rob, Duncan, Manu..they all do whatever for the team and put themself in the second!
I would like to see Tony do the same in the future .... will he?
Duncan Duncan I love you :toast :toast
I don't believe in the 2008 one. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by timvp
This is all good. Duncan doesn't need to have the Spurs by the balls because the Spurs have proven they will spend up to and above the luxury tax threshold. There are only two teams that are slated to stay appreciably above the threshold over the next few years, and Dallas isn't one of them.
So unless Tim wants to be a Knick, we shouldn't worry.
why no news at spurs.com?
So as of next season...
Rashard Lewis > Tim Duncan
On to the Shaq point. In the 2004/2005 season Shaq was due to make something like $26million but he resigned on at a $20million clip??? I think im right...
Hmm why Duncan did not took minimum?
All he wants is money!
Anybody know a website with the updated roster/salaries?
I actually think Ludden asked the Spurs FO for exclusive coverage of this story in order to launch his yahoo career. It was the first big story that he had some control over.Quote:
Originally Posted by ShoogarBear
Probably a favor for all the "mouthpiecing" he did while with the Spurs.
shaq was askn for 100m/4 yrs i thinkQuote:
Originally Posted by whottt
but he took 80m/4yrs only
better than nothing
and plz dont bring up KG his done nothing, by the time he realise to restructure his contract, the damage has been done to the wolves cap to sign any players...
timmy and the spurs braintrust are the gold standard for the nba...and the shipped fatty out of town...great way to start the season!!!
TD is great
For me the best Spur all time