-
Re: Stern defends Suns suspensions
It was a bitch move to have the ASG in PHX again in the first place. It makes him look like he owes AZ something.
Friend or foe? STFU and tell them how it is Stern. Pay me millions of dollars a season and I would have wtfpwn all those cali-wannabe reporters.
-
Re: Stern defends Suns suspensions
Quote:
Originally Posted by da_suns_fan__
Yeah, I suppose everyone who locks their doors at night, or has an alarm, or has a gun for protection is a coward...whatever...
It's not cowardice, it's common sense. It's a dangerous world out there, and it's better to be safe than sorry.
Oh, BTW...
http://www.tomhooverart.com/_images/...rophy_full.jpg
NOT YOURS!!!
:lol :lol :lol :lol :lol
-
Re: Stern defends Suns suspensions
Quote:
Originally Posted by easjer
And the Spurs were without Robert Horry (first option off the bench at the 4) for Game 6. So, yeah.
And let's not forget that Robert Horry was suspended for 2 games for something that other players in similar situations in teh WCSF were not suspended for at all. Talk about make-ups. It was ludicrous that a body check, with arms and elbows in delivered to Nash's body (rather than his ankles, legs, head) got him suspended for 2 games, when elbows flying in the GS series didn't warrant a single suspension.
I do think that changing the other rule for officials and gambling was unfortuante though. It weakened his case, even if the rule was never enforced.
For me, the final and most telling point is that the rule was submitted to the owners for review and change and not one owner outside of Sarver wanted it amended or altered or revoked.
This is old news but I have to disagree with you on one thing. Horry being suspended for 2 games does not hurt the Spurs as much as Stoudemire and Diaw being suspended for 1 game. Thats a tradeoff the Spurs would take every time. Even Coach Popovich admitted as much after Game 5.
-
Re: Stern defends Suns suspensions
I guess we will find in December if the Suns learn from the debacle in Game 4 when they travel to San Antonio. I am sure the crowd will be into the game.
-
Re: Stern defends Suns suspensions
Why are we still talking about this? Nothing is going to change. A rule that has ALWAYS been enforced to impose suspensions (because the rule mandates suspensions) was enforced in that fashion. The league didn't treat the Suns unfairly -- it simply refused to make an exception for them.
I've yet to hear any Suns fan make a compelling argument for why an exception was somehow warranted for their team.
Moreover, as Stern has said repeatedly, those without a dog in the fight who are resources available for considering the consequences of a ruling (members of the Competition Committee, including Basketball Hall of Famers) said that the ruling was correct.
And the rule, despite red-hot protests about its enforcement from Phoenix, was revisited and remained unchanged.
This is a gigantic non-story, other than the demonstrable refusal of Suns fans to quit whining and let go.
-
Re: Stern defends Suns suspensions
Quote:
Originally Posted by FromWayDowntown
Why are we still talking about this? Nothing is going to change. A rule that has ALWAYS been enforced to impose suspensions (because the rule mandates suspensions) was enforced in that fashion. The league didn't treat the Suns unfairly -- it simply refused to make an exception for them.
I've yet to hear any Suns fan make a compelling argument for why an exception was somehow warranted for their team.
Moreover, as Stern has said repeatedly, those without a dog in the fight who are resources available for considering the consequences of a ruling (members of the Competition Committee, including Basketball Hall of Famers) said that the ruling was correct.
And the rule, despite red-hot protests about its enforcement from Phoenix, was revisited and remained unchanged.
This is a gigantic non-story, other than the demonstrable refusal of Suns fans to quit whining and let go.
Yes you have, you just choose to ignore it.
First of all, there wasn't an altercation when Amare and Diaw left the bench. They were just walking over towards Nash after a hard foul when Bell and Horry went at it (and then they immediately stopped).
No different than when Duncan and Bowen walked onto the court when Elson was undercut by James Jones. They were just making sure their teammate was ok just like Amare and Diaw were.
It was egotistical for Stern to the rule the way that he did. Not to mention it was stupid.
Btw - I know Spurs fans (like yourself) are so sick of hearing about this and wish it would just "go away", but thats not our problem. Blame Horry. He's the one who started all of this and he's the reason why your team gets an asterisk.
So you all better get used to it because its never gonna "go away".
-
Re: Stern defends Suns suspensions
Quote:
and he's the reason why your team gets an asterisk.
given by whom?
Quote:
First of all, there wasn't an altercation
In your opinion...doesn't make it true. The NBA saw it differently. Are you saying that you are better than they are at interpreting their rules?
Quote:
when Bell and Horry went at it
there is your altercation.
FWD is a Spur? Cool!
Dude, I thought we were friends...why didn't you tell me?
-
Re: Stern defends Suns suspensions
Nice edit on the whole "Spurs/Spurs fans" thing. :tu
-
Re: Stern defends Suns suspensions
Quote:
Originally Posted by samikeyp
FWD is a Spur? Cool!
Dude, I thought we were friends...why didn't you tell me?
I had figured my Adonis-like physique had been a dead give-away. No need to tell you the obvious, I figured.
:)
-
Re: Stern defends Suns suspensions
Ahh...my bad. :)
Nice job going incognito! :tu :tu
-
Re: Stern defends Suns suspensions
Quote:
Originally Posted by da_suns_fan__
Yes you have, you just choose to ignore it.
First of all, there wasn't an altercation when Amare and Diaw left the bench. They were just walking over towards Nash after a hard foul when Bell and Horry went at it (and then they immediately stopped).
Bell and Horry going at it isn't an altercation? If that's not an altercation, then I guess we have to wait for punches to be thrown for there to be an altercation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsf
No different than when Duncan and Bowen walked onto the court when Elson was undercut by James Jones. They were just making sure their teammate was ok just like Amare and Diaw were.
The difference, of course, is that there wasn't any pushing and shoving in close quarters when Elson and Jones got tangled up. Elson didn't go seek out Jones to mix things up and Jones didn't go seek out Elson. Bell sought out Horry and the two of them did mix things up -- that alone torpedoes your 967th unavailing attempt to link Jones/Elson and Horry/Nash/Bell.
Again, when you can make a compelling argument for making a first-time exception for the Phoenix Suns, I'll listen. Until then, it's whining.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsf
It was egotistical for Stern to the rule the way that he did. Not to mention it was stupid.
It was egotistical for Stern to enforce that rule in precisely the same fashion that it's always been enforced? That's an interesting spin on egotism. I would have thought that choosing to make an exception that has never before been made would be an egotistical move. The rule compels a suspension for anyone who violates it. Two guys violated it. The rule says they're suspended. Stern just enforced the rule as written.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsf
Btw - I know Spurs fans (like yourself) are so sick of hearing about this and wish it would just "go away", but thats not our problem. Blame Horry. He's the one who started all of this and he's the reason why your team gets an asterisk.
Horry's not the one who brings this up every week.
I got another chance last week to celebrate my team's most recent championship -- the one that followed the 2007 playoffs. For the life of me, I didn't see an asterisk anywhere. None on the trophy; none on the rings; none on the banner.
You might believe yourself the asterisk police, but the bling that goes with winning says your badge is tin foil wrapped around a cardboard cutout that your mother made for you. Enjoy wielding your imaginary powers.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsf
So you all better get used to it because its never gonna "go away".
Obviously. Since we'll hear you whining about 2007 for as long as you're here.
What is, exactly, your fascination with the Spurs anyway?
-
Re: Stern defends Suns suspensions
The fact of the matter is that David Stern, for better or worse, is picking and choosing what the NBA chooses to enforce regarding rules. He leaves no wiggle room when interpreting the Suns suspension in last years playoffs however he wiggles out of giving any punishment for the refs that have been gambling, which is clearly against the rules, stating that the rule needs to be re-looked at. Seems to me he can't have it both ways.....literally interpreting one rule while giving slack on another rule, especially when one is dealing with the intergrity of the game (officials gambling). Obviously Stern doesn't want to draw any more attention to the PR nightmare this potentially represents.
-
Re: Stern defends Suns suspensions
Quote:
Originally Posted by FromWayDowntown
Bell and Horry going at it isn't an altercation? If that's not an altercation, then I guess we have to wait for punches to be thrown for there to be an altercation.
Of course it is...but Amare and Diaw left the bench before this happened. They were walking to Nash after seeing him the table so hard. An altercation broke out when they were walking towards him and they realized this and went back to the bench.
Quote:
Originally Posted by FromWayDowntown
It was egotistical for Stern to enforce that rule in precisely the same fashion that it's always been enforced? That's an interesting spin on egotism. I would have thought that choosing to make an exception that has never before been made would be an egotistical move. The rule compels a suspension for anyone who violates it. Two guys violated it. The rule says they're suspended. Stern just enforced the rule as written.
Again, the fact that Amare and Diaw were walking towards Nash isn't the same as leaving the bench during an altercation.
Stern saw an opportunity to show how off his administrative powers and he made a stupid decision. This is where the NATIONAL outrage (not just Suns fans people) comes from. This was not a case of the rule being broken. Stern actually made his own interpretation of what happened and now he has to live with it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by FromWayDowntown
Horry's not the one who brings this up every week.
I got another chance last week to celebrate my team's most recent championship -- the one that followed the 2007 playoffs. For the life of me, I didn't see an asterisk anywhere. None on the trophy; none on the rings; none on the banner.
http://media.bonnint.net/az/2/239/23928.jpg
btw - Surprise surprise that San Antonio fans don't want to admit that there's an asterisk or that their win was tainted. But even you Texans have to admit that there has never been a "champion" questioned or scrutinized as much as the Spurs have been the past few months. Barry Bonds says his record doesnt deserve an asterisk, but its there. People will always bring up that he was on juice when they talk about his home runs just like people will always bring up the suspensions when they talk about the Spurs winning in 2007.
Quote:
Originally Posted by FromWayDowntown
Obviously. Since we'll hear you whining about 2007 for as long as you're here.
Don't blame me. Blame Horry.
WHAT DID YOU EXPECT SPURS FANS? DID YOU THINK EVERYONE WOULD JUST FORGET?
Quote:
Originally Posted by FromWayDowntown
What is, exactly, your fascination with the Spurs anyway?
Please count how many "Suns" threads there are in this forum and get back to me. We'll continue this discussion then.
-
Re: Stern defends Suns suspensions
Quote:
btw - Surprise surprise that San Antonio fans don't want to admit that there's an asterisk
again...placed by whom?
-
Re: Stern defends Suns suspensions
The Suns' assistant coaches didn't do their jobs. Iavaroni read too many of his press clippings, thought he was already a head coach and didn't make sure the players stayed near the bench.
-
Re: Stern defends Suns suspensions
Quote:
Originally Posted by da_smegma_fan
1. The Spurs are boring.
2. The Suns have the best television ratings.
3. I'd rather lose scoring 120 points than win scoring 90 points, while rebounding and playing good defense.
4. I will never get over that series and the self-inflicted wounds that resulted in the Suns losing. EVER.
-
Re: Stern defends Suns suspensions
Quote:
btw - Surprise surprise that San Antonio fans don't want to admit that there's an asterisk
I don't see any asterisk on the NBA site.
-
Re: Stern defends Suns suspensions
In all my years of watching sports I've never seen a fanbase that feels more entitled to something their team hasn't earned than the Ph*enix fans. I think it stems from the coach who clearly has an inferiority complex.
-
Re: Stern defends Suns suspensions
Shouldn't the Suns get one too?
*couldn't win either games 1,3 or 6 at full strength.
-
Re: Stern defends Suns suspensions
Quote:
Originally Posted by MakitTakit
In all my years of watching sports I've never seen a fanbase that feels more entitled to something their team hasn't earned than the Ph*enix fans. I think it stems from the coach who clearly has an inferiority complex.
What I don't get is the constant whining over how that fatally screwed them over. It doesn't automatically follow that having those players available for G5 decisively swings the series. They had to win a game in San Antonio to avoid elimination and they couldn't do it. The Mavs were in the same position and pulled it out. HCA is nice to have, but if you're a title team, it's not necessary. If the Suns were a championship-caliber team, they would've won G6 when the pressure was on. Only reason they pulled out G4 was bc Pop left Duncan on the bench way too long with that fifth foul. That one was played at the Spurs preferred pace for 44 minutes.
-
Re: Stern defends Suns suspensions
Quote:
Originally Posted by da_suns_fan__
WHAT DID YOU EXPECT SPURS FANS? DID YOU THINK EVERYONE WOULD JUST FORGET?
And here I thought that you believed that nobody cares about the Spurs. People would remember that only if they cared, one would think. I don't see there being any sort of wide-spread concern about the propriety of the Spurs' 4th title -- no more than the sanctimonious b.s. that has followed every other title -- but if you insist that it's there, it's then pretty hard to make an argument that nobody cares about the Spurs.
Tin star, buddy.
-
Re: Stern defends Suns suspensions
Quote:
Originally Posted by FWD
I didn't see an asterisk anywhere. None on the trophy; none on the rings; none on the banner.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/media/images/3...ap300spurs.jpg
What's that at the bottom of the Spurs logo? Looks like an asterisk to me. SELF PWNAGE!!1!
-
Re: Stern defends Suns suspensions
Wow.
The sad thing is this is all still consuming the hell out of the Suns, and you know this because Nash is still whining about it too. D'Antoni is playing their new, supposedly great, and definitely injury prone acquisition 40 a night in NOVEMBER. I really just feel pity for the Suns team and some fans that this is so deep in their heads that it's never coming out. The Spurs haven't just beaten this team over and over and over again the last several years, they've actually scarred their star player and some of their fans for life!
Why in the world these Suns' people would want to keep reliving their own failure over and over again is beyond me. I guess they like punishing themselves.
-
Re: Stern defends Suns suspensions
Quote:
Originally Posted by spurs_fan_in_exile
What's that at the bottom of the Spurs logo? Looks like an asterisk to me. SELF PWNAGE!!1!
It's a Star of David -- DAVID STERN!
-
Re: Stern defends Suns suspensions
Quote:
Originally Posted by spurs_fan_in_exile
:owned
:depressed