-
Re: Stern defends Suns suspensions
Game 1 -- would have been a Suns victory if not for Parker cheap shot on Nash
Game 2 -- Suns blowout
Game 3 -- would have been a Suns victory if not for Donaghy & crew fixing game
Game 4 -- Suns victory
Suns actually swept that series. They were obviously and demonstratively better than the Spurs, and it took the movement of heaven and earth to award the Spurs the series through cheating.
Even awarding them two games was only sufficient to create a 2-2 tie. It was clear that without something outrageous, the Suns would win the series despite the effort to fix it for the Spurs. Thus, the "suspensions." If not for that, you know the league office would have scoured the game tapes looking for a reason to suspend some other key player for the Suns, and you know the officiating in Game 5 would have been even more absurd than it was.
Counting Game 5, the Spurs needed three of their four victories delivered illegitimately. It was an obvious fix. Everybody on Earth who is not a Spurs fan knows this. That is why the 2007 championship is a farce.
-
Re: Stern defends Suns suspensions
Wow.
Some Suns fans are complete morons.
Their team deserves to be cursed.
-
Re: Stern defends Suns suspensions
Quote:
Game 1 -- would have been a Suns victory if not for Parker cheap shot on Nash
Nash just got the ball stolen on the previous play and was reaching in trying to get it back when their heads collided. If Nash isn't committing a reach-in foul at that point, he doesn't run the risk of bumping heads.
But logic doesn't agree with you, clearly.
-
Re: Stern defends Suns suspensions
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saguaro
Game 1 -- would have been a Suns victory if not for Parker cheap shot on Nash
Game 2 -- Suns blowout
Game 3 -- would have been a Suns victory if not for Donaghy & crew fixing game
Game 4 -- Suns victory
Suns actually swept that series. They were obviously and demonstratively better than the Spurs, and it took the movement of heaven and earth to award the Spurs the series through cheating.
Even awarding them two games was only sufficient to create a 2-2 tie. It was clear that without something outrageous, the Suns would win the series despite the effort to fix it for the Spurs. Thus, the "suspensions." If not for that, you know the league office would have scoured the game tapes looking for a reason to suspend some other key player for the Suns, and you know the officiating in Game 5 would have been even more absurd than it was.
Counting Game 5, the Spurs needed three of their four victories delivered illegitimately. It was an obvious fix. Everybody on Earth who is not a Spurs fan knows this. That is why the 2007 championship is a farce.
:drunk
-
Re: Stern defends Suns suspensions
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saguaro
It was an obvious fix. Everybody on Earth who is not a Spurs fan knows this. That is why the 2007 championship is a farce.
Ok, fuck stick. Besides Spurs fan, who does this "fix" benefit?
-
Re: Stern defends Suns suspensions
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChumpDumper
I said "not as much" not "not at all."
Besides, you failed to show any real monetary fallout from bumpgate -- so there's no reason to asuage fans who aren't going to be going to the ASG anyway.
Brings the city and fans a huge amount of cash and exposure in tourism a year after they host the Super Bowl - and most likely without the amount of violent activity seen in Vegas.
-
Re: Stern defends Suns suspensions
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saguaro
Game 1 -- would have been a Suns victory if not for Parker cheap shot on Nash
Game 2 -- Suns blowout
Game 3 -- would have been a Suns victory if not for Donaghy & crew fixing game
Game 4 -- Suns victory
Suns actually swept that series. They were obviously and demonstratively better than the Spurs, and it took the movement of heaven and earth to award the Spurs the series through cheating.
Even awarding them two games was only sufficient to create a 2-2 tie. It was clear that without something outrageous, the Suns would win the series despite the effort to fix it for the Spurs. Thus, the "suspensions." If not for that, you know the league office would have scoured the game tapes looking for a reason to suspend some other key player for the Suns, and you know the officiating in Game 5 would have been even more absurd than it was.
Counting Game 5, the Spurs needed three of their four victories delivered illegitimately. It was an obvious fix. Everybody on Earth who is not a Spurs fan knows this. That is why the 2007 championship is a farce.
But of course. Phoenix swept the series. It all makes sense now :lol
Fucking idiot :toast
-
Re: Stern defends Suns suspensions
Props to Saguaro for the funniest post of the year... and one that has incited rage in numerous Spurs fans thus far.
Is it so difficult to read sarcasm on this board or do you all just take yourselves and the Spurs too seriously?
-
Re: Stern defends Suns suspensions
Quote:
Originally Posted by RonMexico
Props to Saguaro for the funniest post of the year... and one that has incited rage in numerous Spurs fans thus far.
Is it so difficult to read sarcasm on this board or do you all just take yourselves and the Spurs too seriously?
Be honest - with "fans" like _da_suns_fan_, etc it's hard to know what's sarcasm and what's not.
Besides, ST rules say that sarcasm has to be in blue.
-
Re: Stern defends Suns suspensions
Quote:
Originally Posted by Strike
Ok, fuck stick. Besides Spurs fan, who does this "fix" benefit?
It's a "thank you" to Peter Holt for faithful service.
-
Re: Stern defends Suns suspensions
Quote:
Originally Posted by RonMexico
Brings the city and fans a huge amount of cash and exposure in tourism a year after they host the Super Bowl - and most likely without the amount of violent activity seen in Vegas.
None of that has anything to do with this:
Quote:
Originally Posted by me
Besides, you failed to show any real monetary fallout from bumpgate -- so there's no reason to asuage fans who aren't going to be going to the ASG anyway.
-
Re: Stern defends Suns suspensions
Quote:
Originally Posted by RonMexico
Hahaha - Nash played great after he hurt his nose... it has to do with the fact that they couldn't stop the bleeding to KEEP him out there.
Exactly. Blood, sprained ankles, whatever. Its apart of the game.
-
Re: Stern defends Suns suspensions
Quote:
Originally Posted by CubanMustGo
Be honest - with "fans" like _da_suns_fan_, etc it's hard to know what's sarcasm and what's not.
Besides, ST rules say that sarcasm has to be in blue.
That's a point well-taken.
Besides, it's equally difficult to convince fans like Chump Dumper that an All-Star Game benefits a city financially. Those fans might not be going to the game, because it's become a corporate piece of garbage, but they'll definitely be tuning in and probably attending the Jam Session activities during the week.
-
Re: Stern defends Suns suspensions
Quote:
Originally Posted by me, for those who don't get it
Besides, you failed to show any real monetary fallout from bumpgate
-
Re: Stern defends Suns suspensions
-
Re: Stern defends Suns suspensions
I said he gave the city a gift. The city (aka individual fans) pays the money for season tickets, which the team receives. In an all-star game, the city and the fans receive the financial benefits.
I don't see what's so hard for you to get about the fact that my original statement has very little to do with the season being sold out, and moreso about the city getting the fun and money from All-Star Weekend.
-
Re: Stern defends Suns suspensions
Still makes no connection to Bumpgate. I don't see why that's so hard for you to get.
-
Re: Stern defends Suns suspensions
Bumpgate isn't a real term. Stop using it.
-
Re: Stern defends Suns suspensions
It's a fine term if only because it annoys you. And you still haven't made any real connection between Bumpgate and the ASG.
-
Re: Stern defends Suns suspensions
Quote:
Originally Posted by kskonn
why are you going to make threats to people over the internet?I guess I Better make sure the alarm is set tonight.
make threats to people? the internet? I don't know what's the matter with you? :dramaquee
Come to visit on January 31st (Spurs 80-Suns113). You are always welcome to our home and IŽll show you the city.:rolleyes
-
Re: Stern defends Suns suspensions
Quote:
make threats to people? the internet? I don't know what's the matter with you?
Come to visit on January 31st (Spurs 80-Suns113). You are always welcome to our home and IŽll show you the city
Hey! No fighting on my birthday...just lots of drinking! :drunk
-
Re: Stern defends Suns suspensions
Quote:
Originally Posted by samikeyp
Hey! No fighting on my birthday...just lots of drinking! :drunk
My drinking buddy, I'll buy you a drink on your birthday :toast
-
Re: Stern defends Suns suspensions
-
Re: Stern defends Suns suspensions
Quote:
Originally Posted by We born to be bad
make threats to people? the internet? I don't know what's the matter with you? :dramaquee
Come to visit on January 31st (Spurs 80-Suns113). You are always welcome to our home and IŽll show you the city.:rolleyes
cool. I come to phoenix a lot ,my sister-in-law and brother-in-law live there, they never show me shit. I just assumed by your earlier comment that you were going to start making threats over the internet like many people on this forum like to do. It sounds like we are up to two of us going so it could be a party. Can you get me a ticket to the game?
-
Re: Stern defends Suns suspensions
Quote:
Originally Posted by kskonn
cool. I come to phoenix a lot ,my sister-in-law and brother-in-law live there, they never show me shit. I just assumed by your earlier comment that you were going to start making threats over the internet like many people on this forum like to do. It sounds like we are up to two of us going so it could be a party. Can you get me a ticket to the game?
Do you want me to buy you one? ticket for Spurs fans? why not? cash and 100 percent commission :lol Don't believe everything its says (on ST). not make threats but city tour? :lol I thought you had more sense than that. Are you so naive? Even so, I donŽt say it to offend you. I like the naive boys!(you don't scare, i'm a girl).Check your private mesengger. :spin