Re: Stern defends Suns suspensions
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saguaro
Game 1 -- would have been a Suns victory if not for Parker cheap shot on Nash
Game 2 -- Suns blowout
Game 3 -- would have been a Suns victory if not for Donaghy & crew fixing game
Game 4 -- Suns victory
Suns actually swept that series. They were obviously and demonstratively better than the Spurs, and it took the movement of heaven and earth to award the Spurs the series through cheating.
Even awarding them two games was only sufficient to create a 2-2 tie. It was clear that without something outrageous, the Suns would win the series despite the effort to fix it for the Spurs. Thus, the "suspensions." If not for that, you know the league office would have scoured the game tapes looking for a reason to suspend some other key player for the Suns, and you know the officiating in Game 5 would have been even more absurd than it was.
Counting Game 5, the Spurs needed three of their four victories delivered illegitimately. It was an obvious fix. Everybody on Earth who is not a Spurs fan knows this. That is why the 2007 championship is a farce.
Kids, don't do drugs, m'kay??? :lol
Re: Stern defends Suns suspensions
They said, 'Shut up and go on to the next subject.’ ”
Re: Stern defends Suns suspensions
Quote:
Originally Posted by phyzik
:lol
Re: Stern defends Suns suspensions
Quote:
Originally Posted by We born to be bad
Do you want me to buy you one? ticket for Spurs fans? why not? cash and 100 percent commission :lol Don't believe everything its says (on ST). not make threats but city tour? :lol I thought you had more sense than that. Are you so naive? Even so, I don´t say it to offend you. I like the naive boys!(you don't scare, i'm a girl).Check your private mesengger. :spin
should have put my statement in Blue( agreed color for sarcasm on spurstalk). either way good luck on the 31st unfortunately I will be watching from San Antonio.
