why splitter?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Cansal

HI EVERYONE!!!!! WHY SPLITTER??????????? BECOUSE HE IS A GENIUS IN EUROPE MAN, TODAY HE WAS FANTASTIC, IN LESS THAN 20 MINUTES MADES 15 PTOS, 1 BLOCK, 2 ASSISTANCES, MANY REBOUNDS............AND WAS THE MOST VALUETED OF THE TEAM. WHEN SPLITTER WAS OUT OF THE COURT TAU BECAMES AWFULL, TERRIBLE, DULL..... AND THEN, WHEN NEVEN PUT HIM IN THE COURT AGAIN, THE DEFENSE OF THE TEAM INCREASED SPECTACULARY AND THAT MADES EASIER TO PLAY MUCH BETTER THAN IN THE FIRST PART OR IN THE THIRD PART. BESIDES, AS FAST AS SPLITTER STAYED ON THE COURT HE STARTED TO SHOOT AND TAU GAVE UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!! SO THESE ARE SOME OF THE REASON WHY TO MANY TAU'S FANS THINK SPLITTER IS AN INCREDIBLE MAN, DO YO NEED ANY MORE????????? :spin :elephant

---

you are the shit compared to most of our gibberish-typing player-advocating foreigners :tu

Actually, Splitter plays a lot like Rasho. He is aggressive and physical on defense but soft on offense- shooting little hook shots and floaters. Seriously. The best comparison for him to any of the recent Spurs big men is Rasho.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ploto

Actually, Splitter plays a lot like Rasho. He is aggressive and physical on defense but soft on offense- shooting little hook shots and floaters. Seriously. The best comparison for him to any of the recent Spurs big men is Rasho.

---

:rolleyes
Splitter is ten times quicker than Rasho and dunks ten times more.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ploto

Actually, Splitter plays a lot like Rasho. He is aggressive and physical on defense.

---

which Rasho are we talking abt here?

Rasho was a physical defender. He was passive on O, but you can't fault his D, so what's your point?

a better version of biedrins?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RuffnReadyOzStyle

Rasho was a physical defender. He was passive on O, but you can't fault his D, so what's your point?

---

This guy never recovered on any rotation...Too slow to cover even NY Curry..How physical was he? I have never read any player saying he is a physical defender and it is too tough to go against him etc....I do not understand when someone says Rasho is a physical defender.....give me a break..

Biedrins is a much better shotblocker

And unlike Rasho, Splitter can actually run up and down a basketball court. Fast break points from Rasho were non-existant.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Hemotivo

a better version of biedrins?

---

Sounds like a good comparison...Lot better than Rasho's comparison...But I think Tiago is taller than Biedrins...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by timmy21_4rings

This guy never recovered on any rotation...Too slow to cover even NY Curry..How physical was he? I have never read any player saying he is a physical defender and it is too tough to go against him etc....I do not understand when someone says Rasho is a physical defender.....give me a break..

---

Hmmmm, I rememebr his weakside D as pretty decent and his man-on-man as tough, especially against big guys like Shaq. He'd always fight them for position and rarely let them get easy shots off. I'm not saying he was up there with Tim or anything, but he was no defensive slouch.