he usually play good against CP3
Printable View
he usually play good against CP3
I don't believe that's the reason.It's the style of play of the PG.Quote:
Originally Posted by Kori Ellis
But I'm happy with Parker,he can score like nobody in the league can do.It's only sometimes I would like to have a PG that could read the game and the situation when the coach can't do it like Nash or Paul do.
But if Parker can do that then he would be better than MJ.
What a lame thread. There is no pg in the league I would trade Parker for.
Josepatches: Whats your point? Paul is better than Parker? Yes Paul is having a better year than Parker. I doubt few will argue with you on that.
This thread is just a knee jerk reaction to a bad loss and pointless.
if cp3 or any other PG was on teh spurs, pop will have to change the offense
4-1 down is not fun okay
but cp3 is legit,
this thread brings out the church of manu supporters and TP haters :D:D
PS. we lost cause duncan only had 12 shot attempts
Good point. Manu > MJ.Quote:
Originally Posted by Hemotivo
Let me try again.
Jesus Christ has had more influence over the history of man than Manu Ginobili.
I would trade Parker for CP3. I would trade Manu for Kobe.
That's not why the Spurs lost this game.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TDMVPDPOY
really
do you know pop?
Again.You don't know me.I'm not from Argentina.I'm not fan of Manu.Quote:
Originally Posted by Kori Ellis
I like more Parker than Manu.
My point is I would like to have a PG like Paul.You can be agree or not.But it's only an opinion
Manu hasn't reached the age of 33 yet.Quote:
Originally Posted by timvp
Of course.I never said that.I said the sameQuote:
Originally Posted by ShoogarBear
so what does paul do that is alot better then tp?
I know paul's numbers would go down with the spurs if tp and paul switched teams and nothing changed
I'd like to have a shooting guard like Lebron James too.Quote:
My point is I would like to have a PG like Paul
This is not a reality. Why would the hornets give up CP3?!
Hes got a really awesome nickname and does those whip behind the back passes alot better.Quote:
so what does paul do that is alot better then tp?
Therefore
CP3 > Parker
Genius.
maybeQuote:
Originally Posted by timvp
but what 'bout women's history?
http://img218.imageshack.us/img218/6697/spurs2uz3.jpg
Paul has the natural instincts and skills of a true point guard. He has court vision and an understanding of how to run a team that TP will never have. You would never hear Gregg Popovich say "we realized Chris Paul was never going to be John Stockton, so we changed what we asked him to do". He shoots FTs an order of magnitude better.Quote:
Originally Posted by ducks
Still doesn't mean that's why the Spurs lost.
Yes, I agree. Too much shopping and thinks these people are just things. Hope the "No Return, No Exchange" rule also applies to this league.Quote:
Originally Posted by PHAT TONY
How about a trade for this guy? Damn, in the front court next to Tim Duncan. Is young and can score,rebound and block shotsJosh Smith
1 hour-68 replies
Interesting to be a lame thread
Josh Smith is better than Bruce Bowen.Quote:
Originally Posted by jay014
This thread is fun.
Problem with this is most posts are stating how unrealistic and lame your thread is.Quote:
Originally Posted by Josepatches
:lol
Wow Rascal on the same page with the rest of us.
Nice job Jose, you've brought about the worst arguement in Spurstalk history for this to happen :lmao
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kori Ellis
lol! i never seen kori get so mad before