Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst 12345
Results 101 to 116 of 116
  1. #101
    Banned lennyalderette's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Post Count
    804
    the only thing i can think about is finley not taking up all our young guys minutes in the playoffs this year !!!!! all we have to do is make sure bonner gets help then were good to go for a good run. you guys notice as soon as finley left we started playing alot better??????????

  2. #102
    Believe. GhosTown's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Post Count
    76
    Not saying that Finley is the missing piece for the Celtics. But he won't hurt them either. They are a defensive minded team with shot blockers and a lock down perimeter defender in Rondo. Adding Finley is not going to hurt this team defensively.

    Having Finley on the floor for the Celtics will never be as bad as having Bonner on the floor for us, regardless of the lineups.

  3. #103
    Rubber Dinghy Rapids Bro Muser's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Post Count
    11,204
    They want him for D?

  4. #104
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Post Count
    2,683
    adding a veteran can never hurt. Adding a guy who can make open shots can never hurt. Adding a guy who's been through the wars can never hurt. That's how we looked at it.
    except if they suck ass on defense and cost your team points and possibly games

    but yeah i guess that would never happen, so it can never hurt.

  5. #105
    Ghost of Mr. K SenorSpur's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Post Count
    14,918
    except if they suck ass on defense and cost your team points and possibly games

    but yeah i guess that would never happen, so it can never hurt.


    I never thought I would see another NBA that stockpiles as many old-ass veterans, the way the Spurs do - but VIOLA - here are the Celtics. In fact, they're probably worse.

  6. #106
    Watching the collapse benefactor's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Post Count
    42,233
    Having Finley on the floor for the Celtics will never be as bad as having Bonner on the floor for us, regardless of the lineups.
    Bonner>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Finley defensively.

  7. #107
    Silence surpasses speech. duncan228's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Post Count
    27,693
    Michael Finley inactive vs. Wizards
    By Chris Forsberg
    ESPNBoston.com

    BOSTON -- What will Michael Finley's role be with the Boston Celtics?

    That's the $1 million question. Or at least the prorated veteran's minimum of $1.1 million question. And neither Finley nor Celtics coach Doc Rivers professed to know the answer Sunday, but both expressed optimism about Boston's recent addition of the veteran swingman.

    "I don't know [my role], that's the big question," admitted Finley, who joined his teammates for the first time at Sunday's tilt with the Washington Wizards.

    Finley asked for and received a buyout from the San Antonio Spurs last week.

    "I just think that I will not hurt anything that [the Celtics] have. This was already a great team without me. I come in, maybe [provide] a little veteran expertise, whether that be on the court or in the locker room -- just doing whatever I can to make this team a better one. But, like I said, this was already a great team before I got here, so I think that my addition is not going to be that big of an impact, if any, but I am just happy and excited to be here.

    "Coach [Rivers] was pretty honest with me, which I respect. He doesn't know how he's going to use me. I have to respect that. I'm coming to a situation where, the team is already established. They've put in [60] games of time, so for me to try to establish a role would be crazy to think like that. But coach has put me in a situation at ease, where he doesn't know, I don't know -- when my situation comes, I'll just go out there and play hard and do what I can to help the team be a better one. I think that I am able to do that."

    Finley arrived in Boston late Saturday night, underwent a physical, and finalized a free-agent contract to cap his 37th birthday celebration. After a session with Boston's assistant coaches Sunday morning, Finley went through about a half-hour warm-up on the court at the Garden before the Wizards game, but was inactive.

    With 12 healthy bodies, including fellow guard Tony Allen, who missed Friday's game at Philadelphia with a sore right hip, Rivers saw no need to rush Finley into action without first getting him acquainted with the system.

    "I don't know [when Finley will play], I really don't," said Rivers. "He may play in the Milwaukee game [Tuesday]. We'll wait and see how comfortable he is, how quickly he can do it. It might be the worst month ever [to join midseason], because there's no practice days, we play just about every day. We're just going to figure this one out on the fly."

    Finley admitted he had to be patient. But sitting in a suit at the end of Boston's bench Sunday, you have to figure he was fighting the urge to rush to the locker room for a jersey as the Celtics struggled for three-plus quarters against the lowly Wizards.

    "I think the biggest adjustment for me is just trying to come in and be perfect right away," said Finley. "In a situation like this, I want to help so badly. I want to do all the perfect things, I put a lot of pressure on myself and that can be detrimental not only to me, but the team as well. I'm just going to try to ease in, ease my role, and just ultimately play basketball."

    Finley brings two key attributes: perimeter shooting and veteran experience. With 1,082 career games, he joins Kevin Garnett (1,104), Rasheed Wallace (1,066), and Ray Allen (1,001), making Boston only the third team in NBA history to boast four players with over 1,000 games experience, according to Elias Sports Bureau.

    If Boston is to remain healthy down the stretch, Finley's addition could force Rivers to make a tough decision on who to make inactive. While Boston could surely use a shooter like Finley, it means moving an end-of-the-bench presence like Brian Scalabrine or, more likely, Shelden Williams to inactive with 13 bodies in Boston (Marcus Landry, the team's 14th and final player, is on assignment in Maine).

    Finley is not only a veteran of 111 playoff games, but regarded as a top locker room presence. He entered the Celtics' clubhouse Sunday and dropped a towel over the head of Marquis Daniels, who he was teammates with in Dallas, and joked, "You're still a rookie to me."

    Ultimately, Finley hopes a role will define itself. But he also admitted that there's not guarantee how this will all play out.

    "Unfortunately, for me, I couldn't finish something that I had in San Antonio because the role was something that I really didn't agree with," said Finley. "But here, hopefully the situation will be different, but you never know, it may be the same. But I'm happy with my situation now and I'm definitely going to make the most of it."

    Finley may not know his role, but here's a few things he did know and expound upon Sunday:

    On choosing No. 40: "Well all the good numbers were taken. I was going to go for 33 [Larry Bird], that was gone, 32 [Kevin McHale] was gone, so I decided on 40. I couldn't get 4, I was two weeks too late to get my No. 4 with Nate Robinson coming over, so I just added an imaginary zero to it and made it 40."

    On the injured ankle that limited him to 25 games this season: "I'm still doing rehab, it was a severe ankle injury that happened back in December so my rehab will continue for the remainder of this year and probably throughout the summer but I'm very confident in it. I talked to the training staff here, and they're an excellent one that I'm just learning the past couple of days, with that being said, I'm ready to go."

    On what went wrong in San Antonio: "This all happened within a week, a week or two span. It was something that started as something little and I think it just erupted. I think both sides, myself and the Spurs organization, there was a mutual split. I have no hard feelings with them, it was just something they were willing to do, and I was man enough to be ready to make that move."

  8. #108
    🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 ElNono's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Post Count
    153,473
    LOL @ this saying the right things now... let's hear from his agent how unhappy he is with his minutes a month from now...

  9. #109
    Veteran L.I.T's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Post Count
    2,363
    Wait...I thought he wanted out so he could play minutes.

    Hmmmmmm...seems almost Paytonesque.

  10. #110
    Believe. mingus's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Post Count
    4,242
    Pop inflated Finley's ego by leting him play so much the last year and into this year when he was healthy.

  11. #111
    REVENGE Avitus1's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Post Count
    3,579
    Good luck to fin on the Cs...

  12. #112
    @Kap10Jack Blackjack's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Post Count
    8,262
    Fin really is coming off as a supreme .

    From all I've heard with regards to people that supposedly have insight into the organization and the response I heard from RC's own mouth a couple of days ago on the radio ... I find it comical how Fin could say there was some kind of eruption that took place and mutual parting of ways.

    Make no mistake, Pop and RC were blind-sided by his request and if not for RC catching himself mid-sentence, preventing him from expressing how disappointed and/or shocked he was with a guy like Fin taking the easy way out when the going got tough, he was on his way to saying as much during the interview; it was like hearing someone tow the company line regurgitating talking points to prevent from slipping up for fear of some kind of future reprisal.

    I have no hard feelings with them, it was just something they were willing to do, and I was man enough to be ready to make that move.
    Weak sauce, Fin . . .

    Adversity doesn't build but expose character; the going got tough, you obviously never got over yourself and/or had the humility to acknowledge your limitation, and you bailed. You weren't man enough to make a move, you were exposed for being either delusional and/or an ungrateful, gravy-training son that had come to the realization that the team that gave you your first and only championship was no longer of any use to you.

    "Class act" always seems to be the term used when Fin is mentioned; one wonders if that's not supposed to be a literal interpretation.

    Good riddance . . .

  13. #113
    Veteran
    My Team
    Boston Celtics
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Post Count
    4,675
    Does anyone think the 2010 Celtics look like the 2009 Spurs?

    - HOF PF playing at 50% due to late season nagging injuries? Check
    - All-star swingman whose body is breaking down? Check
    - Young PG having to carry the entire load every night? Check

    Finley just completes it all. It's going to be an ugly end this year for Boston.
    No.

    -Garnett is playing above 50%.
    -Who's the AS swingman whose body is breaking down? I'm pretty sure Pierce is way more productive now than Ginobili was 1 year ago.
    -You mean the most overrated PG in the NBA who only looks good because he plays with 3 HoFers?

    We'll see.

    I've been saying this for a while now, only I think they're more like the '08 Spurs.

    - terrible 3rd quarter team
    - constantly blowing double digit leads
    - still good, but clearly slipping defensively
    - go on major scoring droughts because they don't have enough players who can create offense or put up big numbers
    - their point differential in 3rd quarters is basically 0, which is bad. But when all the 5 starters play, it's 1.9 which is good.
    - true
    - maybe they're slipping, but they're still the best defensive team in the NBA. And when Garnett is playing, even if still rounding into form, it's still not really close.
    - there are only 3 teams with a superior eFG% than the Celtics. Scoring droughts happen to the 4/5 bench players units Doc plays, especially when the team is shorthanded. Rondo, Pierce, Nate, Daniels, Ray and Garnett is enough shot-creation. The reason the Celtics offence is only average are turnovers. But that's a problem that's been going on in regular seasons since this team was put together.

    You left out the Celtics biggest problem by far (besides turnovers), lack of rebounding.

    Finley was signed to be the 4th/5th wing. He replaces Scalabrine's minutes at the 3 plus part of Tony Allen's minutes. The Celtics 2nd unit is very short on shooting so he makes sense.

    Doc only plays 8-9 guys in the playoff rotation. Robinson and Daniels will absorb all the minutes in the backcourt. Finley will be a situational backup, used to stretch the floor in plays to end the quarters, absorb some minutes if there's major foul trouble and stuff like that.

    In any case, I thought Juwan Howard and Jerry Stackhouse were finished 4 seasons ago. Ditto for Jay Williams. This has been a good season for resuscitations, and Finley has only been dead for 3 years, so one never knows.

  14. #114
    I'm poplovin' it! TJastal's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    7,725
    Hate to break the news to you Mogrevejo, but Scalabrine is way better than Finley... better shooter, defender, and hustle player.

    Plus he is a fan favorite in Boston. Finley will quickly become a fan pain in the ass once he starts missing wide open 3's and blowing defensive assignments.

  15. #115
    Veteran
    My Team
    Boston Celtics
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Post Count
    4,675
    Hate to break the news to you Mogrevejo, but Scalabrine is way better than Finley... better shooter, defender, and hustle player.

    Plus he is a fan favorite in Boston. Finley will quickly become a fan pain in the ass once he starts missing wide open 3's and blowing defensive assignments.
    Scal is a better player than Finley, but not at the 3, unless he's shooting very well and Finley very poorly.

    Who cares anyway? Finley won't play enough to become liked or hated by fans.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •