I agree. I've been underwhelmed with him for much of the season. As much as this team needs someone like him, they don't. They need his young legs, athleticism, rebounding, energy and overall toughness in the paint. But they also need someone bigger, who has a defensive presence and who has a semblance of range.
That's the biggest problem with this team, is the fact that their bigs, while all useful individually, aren't great fits together. Duncan-McDyess are a good pairing (Duncan-Splitter might be, but we've only seen that for about 2 seconds this season, so who knows), but other than that, none of the others are a natural fit for one another.
It's why, if they can't win the championship this season, they should consider trading Blair, McDyess' expiring contract (if he is in fact retiring) and if they have to, either Anderson or their 1st and attempting to pry loose a young big, who's had some success in the league, but has fallen out of favor on his current team and could be had for below market value because their team is desperate to dump their contract. Guys like Biedrins and Blatche spring to mind. Not that I could see the Spurs trading for either, but players of that ilk.
Particularly if Splitter is going to start next season, which would leave Blair to again primarily play next to Bonner. Also, because of his lack of anterior cruciate ligaments, he's not likely to have a long career. I wouldn't necessarily shop him per se, but if the right player is available and attainable at a reasonable cost, then they should trade him.
As far as this season, I've been saying from the start that Blair should be the odd man out. Ultimately, if Bonner falters (considering his history, he should be on a short leash), then they should turn to Blair. Splitter needs to play and unfortunately, I can't see Splitter and Blair being compatible.
But against the Lakers, all five should be utilized. Splitter should be the first big off the bench and Bonner should play some three, so as to allow the Spurs to have more size without sacrificing shooting. Although, it would change the dynamics. If Bonner is playing three, then even if he's shooting well, he wouldn't be pulling Gasol/Odom away from the basket, because they wouldn't be guarding him. But it's still worth a shot in stretches. I'm not concerned with Artest or Barnes exploiting Bonner off the bounce consistently, but if the Lakers want to emphasize that match-up, let them. It takes the ball out of their four best players hands.

Reply With Quote