I'd be pretty surprised to see Toronto pick up their $23 million team option on him since he was basically replacement value this season.
reports are saying the Cavs are looking to move Allen and Garland might ask for a trade if they resign Mitc which right now seems likely. On the other hand teams like the Lakers, Magic and whoever else needs a PG will be all over this as well, which might drive the price up.
I'd be pretty surprised to see Toronto pick up their $23 million team option on him since he was basically replacement value this season.
The fly in the ointment of my proposals is the Cavaliers don't address the gaping hole at PF in either. Trading both Garland and Allen without doing so seems unlikely.
The Lakers can make a compelling offer with Hachimura (ideal fit next to Mobley) and Reaves.
I'm skeptical he's the lead guard the Magic are seeking, but we'll see.
i think they'll pick it up with the hopes of trading him
I guess they could try to get a pick by trading his expiring for a long term deal someone wants to get out of.
I'm anti-Garland, but a trade of Keldon, Tre, Malaki and zero picks I think it's a fair price. I could get behind that.
Keldon as a key, perhaps 3rd scorer getting starter minutes with cost certainty, a 20+ mpg rotation steady back up point guard, and hometown kid Branham as a prospect, that's actually a very good return for a guy who has a disastrous season and is getting run out of town by Mitc . Cuts into their capspace more than I'd like but it is what it is
No picks for Garland please
Cleveland laughs, and hangs up the phone. He was an All Star the year before they brought in that cancer Mitc . He’s allegedly drawing a LOT more interest than Trae Young.
Garland is a lot of empty calories.
Not worth 40 mil over next 4 years.
Spurs won’t do this. Same with Trae.
There are currently 16 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 16 guests)