A trade possibility throw in..

[Spursfanfromafar]

Considering some news floating around on the Kings, the Knicks and the Spurs' requirements..

Does this seem okay?

http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMa...tradeId=dc6aw3

To the admins: If needed, please bump this to some other relevant thread. Thanks.

[Manufan909]

Just search "trade" in the advanced search option, there is an official thread about the subject. And can you post who the trade involved,cuz it won't load for me.

[Spursfanfromafar]

aah. In essence, I tried to get in John Salmons & David Lee for us...and had to fall for the additional bait of Jared Jeffries from the Knicks. The Kings-Knicks meanwhile exchange some expirings in the form of Marbury, Bobby Jax, Malik Rose while giving in a valid center - Brad Miller to the Knicks for a season (2009-10).

[Spursfanfromafar]

And to add.. I expect Bowen to come back after being waived by the Kings..

[pad300]

That is actually a fairly interesting proposal from a lot of points of view.
SAC gets immediate economic relief; which is apparently what they want.
SAS gets an improved roster; what they want. However, they actually increase their immediate costs, which I think is a problem for them...
NY gets to move Marbury; however they probably want more for a rental of Lee...
If you restructure it as 2 seperate but dependent deals, I think more satisfaction on the NON-SAS partners of this can be satisfied...

http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMa...tradeId=dxw4ah

Udoka and Bowen for Salmons
SA also sends cash ($3 Million) to SAC to help cover Bowen's buyout.

and

Lee and Jeffries to SA
Finley, Vaughn, Oberto + Miller, Jackson to NY
Marbury to SAC
NY also sends cash ($3 Million) to SAC to help cover increased salary costs.
SAS sends rights to Splitter to NY

http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine