Reply With Quote
What? it is doubtful that GH starts at PG, maybe SG.
Written by Michael A. De Leon
Wednesday, 23 June 2010 09:44
According to Newsday, Spurs' guard Tony Parker has said that he'd like to be traded if George Hill is given the starting point-guard job.
The Knicks have explored a few options, including Spurs point guard Tony Parker, who has told confidants that he would like to be traded if San Antonio goes with George Hill as the starter.
http://projectspurs.com/2010-article...ll-starts.html
What? it is doubtful that GH starts at PG, maybe SG.
If Hill started ahead of him I wouldn't blame him.
It's sourced from a NY website...so draw your own conclusion.
this thread is going to blooowwww..
I don't see any reason for Hill to be starting though, so hopefully this won't be a problem, assuming that TP actually said that..
Yeah, TP should ask to get traded if Hill starts over the course of the season.
Manu will likely be going back to the bench so that they can continue managing his minutes - so Parker will be back in the starting lineup anyway.
I love parker as much as anybody on here (no , no rainbow) but what is so hard for yall to understand it's over HILL is the future i guess yall didn't watch hill play this year, hill's d is better than tony's d has ever been.
Hill is the future of what?
Hill's D sucked for the most part in the 2009-10 season. It was better in 2008-09. And he averaged less than an assist a game in 34 mpg in the post season - that's horrible, even if you want to say that Manu was the de facto point.
If the Spurs trade Parker, I'd imagine they want a real point guard back that can start.
I could write a paragraph about how hill is a better option than parker right now and for the future but i don't have time.
What don't you understand hat George hill is a shooting guard not a point guard?
I guess you missed the Suns series where Hill was burned by a geriatric Canadian.... a CANADIAN I say!
If the Spurs trade Parker, it's for one reason only - to save money. If Holt & Company decided the spending spree is over due to the Jefferson debacle, then they'll trade Parker for whatever they can and later re-sign Hill for cheap.
Better option for what?
Absolutely, positively THIS.
He's part of the group that thinks Hill is a future PG whenever he drops 20+.
Im not saying he isn't going to be a part of this team for awhile, but i haven't seen one thing that makes me think George Hill can run an NBA offense for a +.500 team.
parker wants to start sure
especially since it is his contract year
oh and hill and tp together on the floor work well
It would really be terrible if the Spurs were forced to sacrifice TP, in part, because of the failed RJ trade. If there was any justice, RJ should be the one to go - not TP. Of course, RJ doesn't have near the value of TP and we know that things don't always work out as they should. Still, I'd hate to see Parker be moved. However if they do move him, it's imperative they get back adequate value.
does it really matter who plays PG???
Splitter is carrying this team to the Finals mother ers!!!!
not with hill running the point he is not
LMFAO
at all the TP rumors.
We're talking about winning another championship next year or before Timmy retires and since we all expect Splitter to join us this coming season its more looks like a reality than a dream, but if we trade TP I think it will be so hard to accomplish this season as a GH our PG, unless we somehow get CP3. No offence to GH, I like him a lot, but he still not Tony Parker, and we all know how important for us to keep the same team next season if we want another ring.
.................. 4yrs from now maybe, MAYBE! But a better option right now? You are on crack my friend. No dayum way. No way.
Exactly how would a sportswriter from a New York newspaper ( Newsday, which by the way, is practically a tabloid) have access to a Tony Parker quote that on one else on the planet has heard?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
