, tbh..
10 games into the new season, and the San Antonio Spurs once again find themselves as the #1 team in the entire NBA. Some things never change.
![]()
Been only 10 games, Phoenix was kickass 2 years ago or last year I dont remember exactly, but after the All Star break everything went downhill for them, they missed the playoffs
By the way, where is Utah in that list, they are worst than Excremento Kings
Lol losing to the sixers
regular season games
Spur fan putting emphasis on meaningless games and regular season performances
who said we were putting emphasis on reg. season games? Besides we coasting yet we 9-1. You guys are coasting yet you're 7-3A championship team should be better than that
It's a good start to the season but it's still early.
Tim Duncan having more rings than your entire franchise
Nothing but trap games, injuries and losing streaks after this thread.
Yeah the Spurs should be 10-0 by now, they suck.
Considering the uber choke job of 6, this start is a job very well done to be 9-1 at this point.
Pace to the season is all that matters. Statistically the Spurs are a dominant team atm -- a weird thing to realize on the eye test. I've caught a replay of every game when I've missed the live telecast and I can say we've played to 70-75% of our abilities, tbh...the Spurs have a switch they go to that lasts a quarter max when things are looking dire. That switch has propelled them to a few early season wins.
So Indiana doesn't get to claim the tie?
The record is nice but I think some of the other top teams have had tougher schedules to this point. Better to see where the Spurs are at, least 1/3 through the season.
Ehhhh, love the 9-1 right now and will take it but it's very early. Wait till our first 3 game losing streak and heads in here will flip.
Won't happen.3 game losing streak
POP + RC playing chess, everyone else playing checkers
per par
Be the best team in June.
Nothing special but it is exceptional. I felt we could have won that Portland game with better defense but oh well. Good start
Why is Pacers below us with better differential?
Point differential has nothing to do with rankings. It's an informative stat (actually quite interesting to see that both 9-1 teams have +9.3 or +9.4 point differential and everybody is way behind).
Then why is spurs first? It cant be alphabetical. Random? or PF?
We didn't lose to the Sixers.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)