Reply With Quote
if u look at his coaching style, this fkn clown is trying to pull a pop on the floor and a phil in the media every game...this clown, why cant he be himself instead of copying others...
but anyway ...hopefully he runs curry into the ground
Yes, Steph Kerr. What a risk they took yesterday. The Warriors are gonna risk not having their best player when its time to play the Sours, the MVP is not needed now to beat the Rox.
if u look at his coaching style, this fkn clown is trying to pull a pop on the floor and a phil in the media every game...this clown, why cant he be himself instead of copying others...
but anyway ...hopefully he runs curry into the ground
Eliancito will be fine and will deep throat us from the opposite side come WCFs....
Curry+ Grant Hill+ Derek Rose=
We will all see what happens. The GSW are favourites, with or without Curry.
LMAO when fans about Pop resting players in the regular season, and now all of a sudden you're supposed to rest your stars in the playoffs?
him sipping on a wet spot is a coaching mistake?
You guys just don't get it. This is the greatest team of all time that we are talking about, it's not some fly-by-night 2-bit operation. This is a team, as their owners said, is so advance in their construction that they will be ruling the league for the next half decade, at the very least. It's not going to let something as minor as an injury to their star player to stop them from going hex-peat. The the rest of league don't have a prayer, even without Curry.
Agreed 100%. Of course we are talking about the West.
Because in the East. The Cavs are unbeatable and will win it all this year.
But in the West, an Eliancito less Wprriers are still the team to beat.
Regardless, Eliancito will be fine and will rub his cream all over our chins
I think you misunderstand the concept you just used.
Rushing a guy back with a bad ankle (second time this year) and playing him 19 first half minutes against a team that you have to try to lose to (no way this goes more than 5 games).
Outside of Kawhi's 42 minutes against Memphis in game three plus LMA's 33 minutes in the same game, no Spur crossed the 30 minute threshold all series. Every minute you're out there against a lesser team that you WILL beat in a series is another opportunity to get injured.
What did his ankle have to do with the floor being wet in that spot? Curry was playing because his ankle was fine and the game was close, just like Kawhi played all game in a close Game 3 in Memphis.
This BS argument is all over RealGM. It *may* be true. But it is also quite possible that the push for 73, which injured his ankle, caused Curry to overcompensate on his knee. That would be a very typical reaction to a slip.
Emotional arguments aside ("I told you so" in reference to 73), any seasoned trainer would know the risk of a high usage player overcompensating on a weak joint. Curry's minutes do not tell the whole story of the toll on his body. His incredible muscle memory and form require intense practice and training. My long term view remains that it will be very hard for him to keep playing at historic levels. His shooting is just such an outlier.
If GSW did not lean so heavily on Curry (if they were more like the Spurs), then Curry with more rest may not have these injuries.
I'd just have all of my players wear Duncan-like knee braces. That thing has saved Tim's career at least a half-dozen times.
it was freak injury unrelated to the ankle one..stuff like this happens..just this year, Manu exploded a testicle on a routine drive to the basket.. so i don't think Kerr is to blame here and he may have actually no power when it comes to the resting (he alluded to that prior to Spurs game)..Curry was certainly overplayed in the last couple of weeks of season, and you have to wonder if ac ulation big minutes led in some way to a gradual ligament erosion/vulnerability..the guy has history and has never been iron man..but then again, joe "light years ahead" lacob was clearly invested in 73..
No. He was kneed in the balls full force.
by a rhino
You should have your balls exploded for mentioning this at lunch
Yeah because knees-to-groin have resulted in multiple testicular injuries/surgeries throughout the years..the freakish part is the invasive medical procedure it led to in case of Manu.
http://instreetclothes.com/2016/02/0...icular-injury/Ginobili isn’t the first testicular injury in the NBA, though the number of reported cases is surprisingly low. Former Sonics forward Detlef Schrempf missed three games during the 1996-97 season following “testicular trauma.” Mavericks’ big man Shawn Bradley also missed three games with testicular trauma during the 1997-98 season but his injury accompanied a groin strain. John Stark missed two playoffs games during the 2001 postseason following an episode of testicular torsion though its development wasn’t basketball-related. Unfortunately none of these injuries seem to be on the same level as Ginobili’s.
Perhaps nothing. Yesterday's injury was a fluke play, but every minute you're on the floor, you're risking an injury. For example, what is Draymond doing on the floor late in the fourth quarter yesterday? No reason at all.
Eliancito was playing on a tender ankle. Usually when players play on tender body parts, the risk of another injury is many times higher.
Kerr rolled the dice and lost. So to say Kerr has no fault on this is a lie. It's a game of probabilities and Kerr got butt ed.
That being said. Elian will be fine and will.... You know the rest
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
what?